Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawyer Doubts Case Against Anthrax Suspect
aolnews ^ | March 10

Posted on 03/10/2010 2:18:17 PM PST by Justice Department

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: Justice Department
You seem... familiar to me somehow. :)

It looks like the feds have wrapped this baby up and put a nice bow on it. I have to admit, the evidence they present does indeed seem pretty compelling to me.

21 posted on 03/13/2010 1:28:19 PM PST by jpl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: EdLake
So, the feds have now suddenly removed eight pages from their printed evidence against Ivins? "Uh oh" indeed. Surely they must know that you and likely many others have a copy of the original version.

It's stuff like this that makes them look bad and untrustworthy in the eyes of so many people. What could possibly be in that interview that they have suddenly decided that people shouldn't be able to see?

22 posted on 03/13/2010 1:34:36 PM PST by jpl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jpl
"What could possibly be in that interview that they have suddenly decided that people shouldn't be able to see?"

I doubt that it's anything sinister. After all, it was probably reviewed and re-reviewed a dozen times before it was put on the FBI's site.

My guess is that someone threatened to file a lawsuit against the FBI because there was something in that interview that was not properly redacted. In other words, people could put pieces together and figure out the name of a confidential informant.

I've printed out a copy and I've read it several times. I don't see anything unusual, but a confidential informant might see things I don't see.

I'm only guessing, of course.

Ed at www.anthraxinvestigation.com

23 posted on 03/14/2010 7:11:29 AM PDT by EdLake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: EdLake
"What could possibly be in that interview that they have suddenly decided that people shouldn't be able to see?"

It was an "off the record" interview that somehow became part of the official record. Someone must have noticed it and demanded that it be removed.

See my comment for this morning on my web site for more details.

Ed at www.anthraxinvestigation.com

24 posted on 03/15/2010 6:39:31 AM PDT by EdLake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson