India Prepares for a Two-Front War

This isn't just a change in military doctrine—it's a reflection of America's declining power in Asia.

There is one country responding to China's military build-up and aggressiveness with some muscle of its own. No, it is not the United States, the superpower ostensibly responsible for maintaining peace and security in Asia. Rather, it is India, whose military is currently refining a "two-front war" doctrine to fend off Pakistan and China simultaneously.

Defending against Pakistan isn't anything new, and Delhi has long viewed China with suspicion. But in recent years India has been forced to think more seriously about an actual armed conflict with its northern neighbor. Last year Beijing started a rhetorical clash over the Dalai Lama's and Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's visits to Arunachal Pradesh state, which China claims as its own. In the two years before that, Chinese border incursions into India almost doubled. Not to mention China's massive military buildup and concerted push for a blue-water navy.

In response, the Indian military is rewriting its so-called "Cold Start" doctrine. Cold Start's initial intent was to provide the armed forces with more rapid and flexible response options to Pakistani aggression. The Indian military believed that its ground forces' slow and lumbering mobilization after the 2001 terrorist attacks on its parliament played to Pakistan's advantage: International opinion turned against decisive Indian military action. Delhi also worried that its plan to send in heavy forces to weaken Pakistan was unrealistic and might well trigger a nuclear response.

So Indian strategists searched for military solutions that would avoid a nuclear response but still provide a rapid retaliatory punch into Pakistan. The resulting doctrine was built around eight division-sized "integrated battle groups"—a combination of mobile ground forces backed by air power

Collapse of the Roman Empire. Once Rome could no longer enforce its rule or even be the symbolic unifying reference for the many cultures that it influenced, human civilization as a whole regressed. This affected not only in its technological and even artistic skills, but certain social concepts and ideas of governance. It also led to an increasing break-down and reduction of the size of governing units so that the counter-productive situation of a multiplicity of warring kings revived.

The Church was somewhat successful in Europe in attempting to fill this cultural gap and provide both unity and a trans-national view which kept established societies from reverting back into warring tribes, but one of the reasons Islam was so successful in the Middle East was that the unity of the Church had been weakened by various theological disputes and, in addition, Constantinople had never had the organizational power of Rome. This left Middle Eastern societies very vulnerable, and when the crazed Arab would-be dictator Mohammed thought up his scam, not only were the countries militarily weak, but they had no cohesiveness among them and could neither aid one another nor provide a solid, unified counterweight to Islam. Once it took over, it provided them with a framework to see themselves as something other than warring kingdoms and for awhile provided some stability and unity in the Middle East and other places to which it extended itself towards the East.

One of the reasons it was rejected in the West was that enough of a trace remained of Romanitas and, in addition, the Church was strong enough to provide the societies with a counterweight.

Spain, the only country briefly conquered by Islam, was taken largely unawares because Islam was only about 50 years old and most people had little idea of what it was. Spain was also plagued by warring kings, and had some religious disunity because the invading Visigoths had initially been Arians and not orthodox Christians in union with Rome. By the time of the Islamic invasions, the Visigothic rulers had converted, but the wars among them had not yet subsided. But resistance to Islam began very rapidly. While it took 700 years to get all the Muslim rulers out of Spain, in practice large parts had been recaptured by Christians within only a couple of hundred years, and the fight continued to push south, being halted a couple of times when fresh contingents of North African Muslims attacked Spain but resuming as soon as possible.

Obama is, of course, radically opposed to Western values (Greco-Roman Judeo-Christian) and Western society, and all of his actions express his contempt for it and his desire to destroy it. And into that vacuum is going to come...what?

Another informative post, and tx again.

I understand that India is well on its way to attaining a world-class navy, including Indian-built nuclear subs, aircraft carriers, and all the rest. I'm not any expert on military technology, but I know geography, and the only way China could threaten India would be by lobbing IBMs over the Himalayas. So if India can build a good anti-missile defense system, it would be very difficult for China launch a serious attack.

As for Pakistan, its gov't is disorganized, though some elements support Muslim insurgents to nip at her flanks and carry out the bombings we have all read about. But as for a serious threat, Pakistan has somewhere between 6 and 12 nuclear warhead, that's it. OTOH, India possesses hundreds, and also produces some of the world's smartest physicists and mathematicians. Pakistan couldn't win, and probably wouldn't dare initiate, a nuclear war with India.

I believe India is being prudent in its defense strategy, I support it, and I would like to see closer military and economic ties with India (now that they are not officially socialist).

“The US recently declared that we cannot fight a two-front war.
The US recently ended its space program.
India can do both of these things. We cannot.
India is a superpower. We are a used-to-be.”

The Obama Admistration recently declared that we cannot fight a two-front war.

The Obama Admistration recently ended our space program.

India can do both of these things. We still can, sans the Obama Admistration.

India can become a superpower, we still are.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.