Posted on 02/20/2010 9:59:07 PM PST by pissant
She was also flotinting some rumor about medinas family that had no backing.
Could you tell me what that rumor is? I’ve asked her about the husband thing but she won’t give specifics, just says it’s a rumor floating around the net. Thus she deals in rumor, inuendo, etc. Her creds aren’t to be trusted that’s for sure, imo.
Sorry I didn’t pay attention to the specifics of the rumor. You can probably look through patriot08s posts to find out more.
No, she isn’t, but you and glenn beck can continue to pretend, nancy.
Yeah, well Jimmuh Carter had lots of experience. Experience means NOTHING. Wisdom means everything.
LOL. Yah, we all heard evidence of Medina’s “wisdom” on Glen Beck’s radio show.
I have no idea. BY what frickin logic doe two open borders RINOS continue to push for open borders and amnesty year after year.
My guess is someone is lining their evil pockets. OR they are just really that dumb.
Funny, so did everyone else, yet she never said she believed any of it.
Gay rights? That’s a new (and false) one.
Right. And politicians never lie after making an embarrassing admission in public. LOL! Stop making me laugh!
LOL! Thanks for the well-reasoned reply!
“Our time has come”, sounds to much like the “we are the ones we’ve been waiting for!” spouted by Bozo.
ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!! Massive crowd!!!!!!!!!
Cautious? Why would a conservative politician have to be cautious about simply saying, "No!" I don't believe our government brought down the twin towers. Either she believes they did or she believes they didn't and her answer makes it clear she believes they did. Even when the "clarified" her statement later she danced around the NO answer and didn't say it.
If you think she was being "cautious" you have blinded yourself to what this woman really believes, IMO.
BTW, I don't live in Texas but if I did I wouldn't vote for this woman.
I want people to take a breath and look at what the Paulestinians are vigorously defending here. The kind of people they aren’t willing to disavow.
They defend her because she SAYS she’s for limited government, and possibly because, even though she’s not saying so now, she knows *wink, wink* the truth.
What has she ever DONE about limited government?
For that matter, what has Ron Paul ever done? He only makes unusual votes to gain attention to himself on bills whose outcome is not in doubt and he gets earmarks for his district.
There are a lot of non-”libertarian” Congressmen who eschew earmarks altogether and are thus more principled than Paul, even though a case can be made that if the system exists, you have to serve your constituency.
Well, Paul does consistently vote against Israel, so there’s that.
These people aren’t who they say they are. Look at what they are willing to defend.
Either she is a truther or she totally misunderstood the question, either way she is unfit for office, and those that compare her to Palin are full of it too, she has accomplished nothing that compares with what Palin did in Alaska.
I think that's a matter of Dr(i)RP playing to those who make campaign contributions to him. I gather many of his contributors don't like Israel very much.
Just a little what-if theatre:
GLENN BECK: I have when I said that I was going to have you on, you can’t imagine the mail pro and con that I received. There was a theme that ran against you and that is you are an Alamo Truther.
DEBRA MEDINA: Well, there’s lots of mud that people would like to throw at Debra Medina and make stick. The truth is I’m an everyday ordinary person. I am fighting for the things that our founders fought for, those very basic principles of a constitutional republic, and I’m going to champion people that hold their government accountable, hold me accountable but that’s the first time I’ve heard that accusation. So that’s an interesting one.
GLENN: Right. Here’s then let me be more frank and ask you the question: Do you believe the government Republic of Texas was in any way involved with the bringing down of the Alamo in 1836?
MEDINA: I don’t...I don’t have all of the evidence there, Glenn. So I don’t I’m not in a place, I have not been out publicly questioning that. I think some very good questions have been raised in that regard. There are some very good arguments, and I think the Texan people have not seen all of the evidence there. So I’ve not taken a position on that.
Right you are
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.