Posted on 02/17/2010 7:33:31 PM PST by rabscuttle385
damn right. How many times do we have to get scr*wed over before people wake up? Beaten Wife Syndrome (BWS)!
If Fred Thompson is the 20thCentury Will Rodgers, then Rosie O’Donnnel is ALbert Einstein.
Damn straight....(I like your BWS...it’s true!)
So my focus was on reasons why Fred Thompson might not be as willing to endorse Hayward as others here want him to be. And why Sarah Palin may not have been so willing to endorse Hayward as others here want her to be.
Funny. You didn't say a word about any of that. Interesting that you give different false names for JD too and continue on with your phony baloney "second coming of Reagan" meme.
Exactly! No one has been holding up JD as anything or anyone but himself. JD. This was just a weak attempt to undercut him. There is only one purpose and outcome for doing that.
Ummm.. Where in the hell in my post did I say anything about I supported Huckabee?
I certaintly DID NOT.
Please, take a reading comprehension class before you reply and insult me.
You're the one who crys like a b!tch that Fred took votes from Huckabee, not me.
One symptom is when the patients says, "But he promised he'd never hit me again. He even brought me some flowers...well actually they were blooms from the weeds out back, where he was going to plant that nice lawn for me, ah, 5 years ago...but he promised!! I know he luvs me....is the swelling going down a little now?" (taking icepack from eye)
McMexico, only your illegals, your libtards, your fools & morons, and your Battered Wives are going to vote for you!
GO HAWORTH
IT IS ONY AN ACT, MY FRIEND. AND IT IS THE 21ST CENTURY NOW, NOT THE 20TH. THIS RINO IS PLAYING THE ROLE AND PEOPLE ARE EATING IT UP! O’DONNEL IS NOT WORTH MWNRIONING. BUT I GET YOUR MEANING. :)
My entire post was things about Haywood that could explain why Thompson and Palin endorsed McCain, and why DeMint is staying out of the race.
And it is hilarious that you think someone defending Thompson is somehow about Mitt Romney, who as far as I can tell is NOT running for Senator from Arizona, and who when I last looked was running AGAINST John McCain for President, and whom McCain did NOT pick as VP.
I know you want to figure out a good way to dismiss what I am saying, but wouldn’t it just be easier to point out whatever I said that was wrong?
I’ve never heard typos referred to as “false names” before, but I guess if you are looking for offenses, you can see them in anything.
And yes, I did purposely misspell JD’s name that time. Just tweeking you, as it seems to be a big deal for you and all.
Riiiiight. And it suits your purpose well too.
I did.
His name is HAWORTH. NOT Haywood. H-A-W-O-R-T-H. (John D., AKA Big Bad John!)
You argued against my statement that McCain was a fixture in DC, while never explaining why you thought it was wrong (and it certainly is right, the guy has been there forever).
You argued against my statement that Hayworth isn’t the 2nd coming of Reagan, but never said he was, and implied that you agreed that he wasn’t.
So in the two statements I made that you argued with, both statements were right, and you didn’t say anything to suggest they were wrong.
Instead, you went off on some witch-hunt.
I don’t see how misspelling JD Hayworth’s name “suits my purpose”. If, as you suggest, my goal is to post things attacking him that other people will read, I would want to spell his name correctly, so searches found my posts.
But since in fact, I am not trying to attack Hayworth, merely trying to give reasons why Fred Thompson shouldn’t be attacked for backing McCain, it doesn’t really matter that I don’t spell his name right, because my references to him are ancillary.
Maybe you could explain why you think that misspelling someone’s name “suits some purpose”.
Of course he did. RINOs beget RINOs. They are from the same wing of the Republican party, and it aint the Goldwater/Reagan wing...
LOL.
(I assume you were trying to be funny, right? Or else you wouldn’t have misspelled his name).
If it doesn't come from a 3rd party, or from the Goldwater Reagan wing of the Republican party, it isn't worth looking at - Just re-arranging deck chairs...
Exactly TRUE.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.