Posted on 02/15/2010 6:13:28 AM PST by massmike
Kevin Jennings, Barack Obama's "Safe Schools Czar" is coordinating with far-left members of Congress to extend the radical homosexual / transgender agenda into the nation's public schools by force of federal law, according to press reports.
On January 27, 66 congressmen introduced HB 4530 which requires that homosexuality and transgender behavior (including cross-dressing) be officially normalized in America's public schools. It also includes broad powers of enforcement against schools or individuals who resist this, including lawsuits, awarding of attorneys fees, loss of federal funds to the school district, and assorted remedies tied to other federal laws.
(Excerpt) Read more at massresistance.org ...
This kind of crap has got to stop! Some days I think I’m living in a nightmare.
This is what a DICTATORSHIP looks like. And the majority of voters supported him. If Zero OR Big Media had been truthful about his history we would not be in this situation.
Student Nondiscrimination Act of 2010 (Introduced in House)
HR 4530 IH
111th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. R. 4530
To end discrimination based on actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity in public schools, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 27, 2010
Mr. POLIS of Colorado (for himself, Mr. ACKERMAN, Ms. BALDWIN, Ms. BERKLEY, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, Mrs. CAPPS, Mr. CAPUANO, Ms. CASTOR of Florida, Ms. CHU, Ms. CLARKE, Mr. COURTNEY, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mrs. DAVIS of California, Ms. DEGETTE, Mr. DOYLE, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. FARR, Mr. FILNER, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. GARAMENDI, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. HALL of New York, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. HOLT, Mr. HONDA, Mr. ISRAEL, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Ms. LEE of California, Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mrs. MALONEY, Mr. MEEKS of New York, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Mr. NADLER of New York, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Ms. NORTON, Ms. PINGREE of Maine, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr. ROTHMAN of New Jersey, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Ms. LINDA T. SANCHEZ of California, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. SHERMAN, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Ms. SPEIER, Mr. STARK, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. WELCH, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. WU, Mr. KUCINICH, and Ms. KILROY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor
A BILL
To end discrimination based on actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity in public schools, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Student Nondiscrimination Act of 2010’.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSES.
(a) Findings- The Congress finds the following:
(1) Public school students who are lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender (LGBT), or are perceived to be LGBT, or who associate with LGBT people, have been and are subjected to pervasive discrimination, including harassment, bullying, intimidation and violence, and have been deprived of equal educational opportunities, in schools in every part of our Nation.
(2) While discrimination, including harassment, bullying, intimidation and violence, of any kind is harmful to students and to our education system, actions that target students based on sexual orientation or gender identity represent a distinct and especially severe problem.
(3) Numerous social science studies demonstrate that discrimination, including harassment, bullying, intimidation and violence, at school has contributed to high rates of absenteeism, dropout, adverse health consequences, and academic underachievement among LGBT youth.
(4) When left unchecked, discrimination, including harassment, bullying, intimidation and violence, in schools based on sexual orientation or gender identity can lead, and has lead to, life-threatening violence and to suicide.
(5) Public school students enjoy a variety of constitutional rights, including rights to equal protection, privacy, and free expression, which are infringed when school officials engage in discriminatory treatment or are indifferent to discrimination, including harassment, bullying, intimidation and violence, on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity.
(6) While Federal statutory protections expressly address discrimination on the basis of race, color, sex, religion, disability, and national origin, Federal civil rights statutes do not expressly include `sexual orientation’ or `gender identity’. As a result, students and parents have often had limited legal recourse to redress for discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity.
(b) Purposes- The purposes of this Act are—
(1) to ensure that all students have access to public education in a safe environment free from discrimination, including harassment, bullying, intimidation and violence, on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity;
(2) to provide a comprehensive Federal prohibition of discrimination in public schools based on actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity;
(3) to provide meaningful and effective remedies for discrimination in public schools based on actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity; and
(4) to invoke congressional powers, including but not limited to the power to enforce the 14th Amendment to the Constitution and to provide for the general welfare pursuant to section 8 of article I of the Constitution and the power to enact all laws necessary and proper for the execution of the foregoing powers pursuant to section 8 of article I of the Constitution, in order to prohibit discrimination in public schools on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity.
SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.
For purposes of this Act:
(1) PROGRAM OR ACTIVITY- The terms `program or activity’ and `program’ have same meanings given such terms as applied under section 606 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d-4a) to the operations of public entities under paragraph (2)(B) of such section.
(2) GENDER IDENTITY- The term `gender identity’ means the gender-related identity, appearance, or mannerisms or other gender-related characteristics of an individual, with or without regard to the individual’s designated sex at birth.
(3) HARASSMENT- The term `harassment’ means conduct that is sufficiently severe, persistent, or pervasive to limit a student’s ability to participate in or benefit from a public school education program or activity, or to create a hostile or abusive educational environment at a public school, including acts of verbal, nonverbal, or physical aggression, intimidation, or hostility, if such conduct is based on—
(A) a student’s actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity; or
(B) the actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity of a person or persons with whom a student associates or has associated.
(4) PUBLIC SCHOOLS- The term `public schools’ means public elementary and secondary schools, including local educational agencies, educational service agencies, and State educational agencies, as defined in section 9101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965.
(5) SEXUAL ORIENTATION- The term `sexual orientation’ means homosexuality, heterosexuality, or bisexuality.
(6) STUDENT- The term `student’ means an individual who is enrolled in a public school or who, regardless of official enrollment status, attends classes or participates in a public school’s programs or educational activities.
SEC. 4. PROHIBITION AGAINST DISCRIMINATION; EXCEPTIONS.
(a) In General- No student shall, on the basis of actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity of such individual or of a person with whom the student associates or has associated, be excluded from participation in, or be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
(b) Harassment- For purposes of this Act, discrimination includes, but is not limited to, harassment of a student on the basis of actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity of such student or of a person with whom the student associates or has associated.
(c) Retaliation Prohibited-
(1) PROHIBITION- No person shall be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination, retaliation, or reprisal under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance based on his or her opposition to conduct made unlawful by this Act.
(2) DEFINITION- For purposes of this subsection, `opposition to conduct made unlawful by this Act’ includes, but is not limited to—
(A) opposition to conduct reasonably believed to be made unlawful by this Act,
(B) any formal or informal report, whether oral or written, to any governmental entity, including public schools and employees thereof, regarding conduct made unlawful by this Act or reasonably believed to be made unlawful by this Act,
(C) participation in any investigation, proceeding, or hearing related to conduct made unlawful by this Act or reasonably believed to be made unlawful by this Act, and
(D) assistance or encouragement provided to any other person in the exercise or enjoyment of any right granted or protected by this Act,
if in the course of that expression, the person involved does not purposefully provide information known to be false to any public school or other governmental entity regarding a violation, or alleged violation, of this Act.
SEC. 5. FEDERAL ADMINISTRATIVE ENFORCEMENT; REPORT TO CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.
Each Federal department and agency which is empowered to extend Federal financial assistance to any education program or activity, by way of grant, loan, or contract other than a contract of insurance or guaranty, is authorized and directed to effectuate the provisions of section 4 of this Act with respect to such program or activity by issuing rules, regulations, or orders of general applicability which shall be consistent with achievement of the objectives of the Act authorizing the financial assistance in connection with which the action is taken. No such rule, regulation, or order shall become effective unless and until approved by the President. Compliance with any requirement adopted pursuant to this section may be effected—
(1) by the termination of or refusal to grant or to continue assistance under such program or activity to any recipient as to whom there has been an express finding on the record, after opportunity for hearing, of a failure to comply with such requirement, but such termination or refusal shall be limited to the particular political entity, or part thereof, or other recipient as to whom such a finding has been made, and shall be limited in its effect to the particular program, or part thereof, in which such noncompliance has been so found, or
(2) by any other means authorized by law,
except that no such action shall be taken until the department or agency concerned has advised the appropriate person or persons of the failure to comply with the requirement and has determined that compliance cannot be secured by voluntary means. In the case of any action terminating, or refusing to grant or continue, assistance because of failure to comply with a requirement imposed pursuant to this section, the head of the Federal department or agency shall file with the committees of the House and Senate having legislative jurisdiction over the program or activity involved a full written report of the circumstances and the grounds for such action. No such action shall become effective until 30 days have elapsed after the filing of such report.
SEC. 6. CAUSE OF ACTION.
(a) Cause of Action- Subject to subsection (c) of this section, an aggrieved individual may assert a violation of this Act in a judicial proceeding. Aggrieved persons may be awarded all appropriate relief, including but not limited to equitable relief, compensatory damages, cost of the action, and remedial action.
(b) Rule of Construction- This section shall not be construed to preclude an aggrieved individual from obtaining other remedies under any other provision of law or to require such individual to exhaust any administrative complaint process or notice-of-claim requirement before seeking redress under this section.
(c) Statute of Limitations- For actions brought pursuant to this section, the statute of limitations period shall be determined in accordance with section 1658(a) of title 28 of the United States Code. The tolling of any such limitations period shall be determined in accordance with the law governing actions under section 1979 of the Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 1983) in the forum State.
SEC. 7. STATE IMMUNITY.
(a) State Immunity- A State shall not be immune under the 11th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States from suit in Federal court for a violation of this Act.
(b) Waiver- A State’s receipt or use of Federal financial assistance for any program or activity of a State shall constitute a waiver of sovereign immunity, under the 11th Amendment to the Constitution or otherwise, to a suit brought by an aggrieved individual for a violation of section 4 of this Act.
(c) Remedies- In a suit against a State for a violation of this Act, remedies (including remedies both at law and in equity) are available for such a violation to the same extent as such remedies are available for such a violation in the suit against any public or private entity other than a State.
SEC. 8. ATTORNEY’S FEES.
Section 722(b) of the Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 1988(b)) is amended by inserting `the Student Nondiscrimination Act of 2010,’ after `Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000,’.
SEC. 9. EFFECT ON OTHER LAWS.
(a) Federal and State Nondiscrimination Laws- Nothing in this Act shall be construed to preempt, invalidate, or limit rights, remedies, procedures, or legal standards available to victims of discrimination or retaliation under any other Federal law or law of a State or political subdivision of a State, including title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.), title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.), section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794), the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.), or section 1979 of the Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 1983). The obligations imposed by this Act are in addition to those imposed by title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.), title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.), and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.).
(b) Free Speech and Expression Laws and Religious Student Groups- Nothing in this Act shall be construed to alter legal standards regarding, or affect the rights available to individuals or groups under, other Federal laws that establish protections for freedom of speech and expression, such as legal standards and rights available to religious and other student groups under the 1st Amendment to the Constitution and the Equal Access Act (20 U.S.C. 4071 et seq.).
SEC. 10. SEVERABILITY.
If any provision of this Act, or any application of such provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this Act, and the application of the provision to any other person or circumstance shall not be affected.
SEC. 11. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Act shall take effect 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and shall not apply to conduct occurring before the effective date of this Act.
It only happens if Congress allows it.
I love it when liberals out themselves. NO MORE KENNEDYS!!!!!!
Is there any reason why I should believe Congress wont allow it?
CULTURAL AND EDUCATIONAL POLICY
The Social Democratic Party is striving for the abolition of the educational privileges of the propertied classes.
Education, schooling, and research are public matters; their operation is to be secured through public institutions and the expenditure of public funds. The provision of instruction and instructional materials free of charge. Economic support for pupils and students.
The public institutions of education, schooling, culture and research are secular. All legally grounded interference in these institutions by churches and religious or ideological communities is to be opposed. Separation of church and state. Separation of church and schools. Secular technical and occupational schools and institutions of higher education. No expenditure of public monies for ecclesiastical or religious purposes.
The unified structuring of the school system. The creation of the closest possible relations between practical and intellectual labor on all levels.
The common education of both sexes by both sexes.
Standardized training of teachers in colleges and universities. [...]
Program of SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY (SPD)
Accepted at the Heidelberg Sozialdemokratische Partei Congress on September 18, 1925.
Main sponsor:
Rep. Jared Polis [D-CO2]
Co-Sponsors (65):
Rep. Gary Ackerman [D-NY-5]
Rep. Tammy Baldwin [D-WI-2]
Rep. Shelley Berkley [D-NV-1]
Rep. Howard Berman [D-CA-28]
Rep. Earl Blumenauer [D-OR-3]
Rep. Robert Brady [D-PA-1]
Rep. Lois Capps [D-CA-23]
Rep. Michael Capuano [D-MA-8]
Rep. Kathy Castor [D-FL-11]
Rep. Judy Chu [D-CA-32]
Rep. Yvette Clarke [D-NY-11]
Rep. Joe Courtney [D-CT-2]
Rep. Joseph Crowley [D-NY-7]
Rep. Elijah Cummings [D-MD-7]
Rep. Susan Davis [D-CA-53]
Rep. Diana DeGette [D-CO-1]
Rep. William Delahunt [D-MA-10]
Rep. Michael Doyle [D-PA-14]
Rep. Keith Ellison [D-MN-5]
Rep. Eliot Engel [D-NY-17]
Rep. Sam Farr [D-CA-17]
Rep. Bob Filner [D-CA-51]
Rep. Barney Frank [D-MA-4]
Rep. John Garamendi [D-CA-10]
Rep. Raul Grijalva [D-AZ-7]
Rep. Luis Gutiérrez [D-IL-4]
Rep. John Hall [D-NY-19]
Rep. Alcee Hastings [D-FL-23]
Rep. Maurice Hinchey [D-NY-22]
Rep. Mazie Hirono [D-HI-2]
Rep. Rush Holt [D-NJ-12]
Rep. Michael Honda [D-CA-15]
Rep. Steve Israel [D-NY-2]
Rep. Henry Johnson [D-GA-4]
Rep. Mary Jo Kilroy [D-OH-15]
Rep. Dennis Kucinich [D-OH-10]
Rep. Barbara Lee [D-CA-9]
Rep. Zoe Lofgren [D-CA-16]
Rep. Carolyn Maloney [D-NY-14]
Rep. Betty McCollum [D-MN-4]
Rep. James McDermott [D-WA-7]
Rep. James McGovern [D-MA-3]
Rep. Gregory Meeks [D-NY-6]
Rep. James Moran [D-VA-8]
Rep. Jerrold Nadler [D-NY-8]
Rep. Grace Napolitano [D-CA-38]
Rep. Eleanor Norton [D-DC]
Rep. Glenn Nye [D-VA-2]
Rep. Chellie Pingree [D-ME-1]
Rep. Mike Quigley [D-IL-5]
Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen [R-FL-18]
Rep. Steven Rothman [D-NJ-9]
Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard [D-CA-34]
Rep. Linda Sánchez [D-CA-39]
Rep. Janice Schakowsky [D-IL-9]
Rep. José Serrano [D-NY-16]
Rep. Brad Sherman [D-CA-27]
Rep. Louise Slaughter [D-NY-28]
Rep. Jackie Speier [D-CA-12]
Rep. Fortney Stark [D-CA-13]
Rep. Edolphus Towns [D-NY-10]
Rep. Anthony Weiner [D-NY-9]
Rep. Peter Welch [D-VT]
Rep. Lynn Woolsey [D-CA-6]
Rep. David Wu [D-OR-1]
Looks like it’s time for parents to do their job...AT HOME.
Of course not. They do not listen to you and I. We the voters are beneath them. We could try to melt down their switch board and lock up their computers, but it probably wouldnt help.
But you can vote their asses out in a few short months.
Ros-Lehtinen was an original author of the Vision Care for Kids Act. She is also an original cosponsor of the Vision Preservation Act.
Ros-Lehtinen is a Republican, although she sides with the Democrats on the issue of gay rights. Her district includes large LGBT populations in South Beach in Miami Beach and in the Florida Keys. She is currently the only Republican member of the LGBT Equality Caucus and is a vice-chairperson. She supports anti-hate crime laws, anti-discrimination bills, believes gays and lesbians should be allowed to serve openly in the armed forces, is a sponsor of the Domestic Partnership Benefits and Obligations Act, voted against the Federal Marriage Amendment, and was a founding member (one of only two Republicans[5]) and the only current Republican member of the LGBT congressional caucus.[6]
Daisyjane69: “Looks like it’s time for parents to do their job...AT HOME.”
That’s all well and good, but how long are you going to hunker down in your home before they come for you? Seriously. You can’t run from this stuff forever. You have to face it and defeat it!
Out she goes in Nov.
We saw the movie The Last Station yesterday. The last days of Tolstoy. At one point he proclaims ‘our privilege disgusts me’. I know it’s a movie but it seemed to sum him up pretty well. Your post also seems to sum him up pretty well. We must stop the Leftists who want to remake our country in the vision of the USSR.
The forced march toward communism picks up speed.
Looks like it is bipartisan.
Here is the money quote from the bill....
this is how they coerce the states...
“....A State’s receipt or use of Federal financial assistance for any program or activity of a State shall constitute a waiver of sovereign immunity, under the 11th Amendment to the Constitution....”
“SEXUAL ORIENTATION- The term `sexual orientation’ means homosexuality, heterosexuality, or bisexuality.”
And of course, these protective measures will be applied equally to the Christian heterosexual student who is bullied, berated and abused by “the ladies” for exercising his or her constitutional right to speak. Right? Uh...right? Helloooooooo....
Colonel, USAFR
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.