Posted on 02/06/2010 5:56:33 AM PST by Zakeet
Another Obama supporter becomes a Corpse Woman . . .
I should have added:
FOR PROFIT!!!!
“What is the percentage of women who have had an abortion that also have breast cancer?”
You can probably find lots of information here:
http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com/start/
(China has experienced a huge increase in breast cancer since beginning their one-child policy.)
BIG profit!
Proof that not only the good die young.
Maybe because she was a mass murderer?
She and her twin sister both died of breast cancer. I think her mother may also have had breast cancer.
A murderer is a coward.
what a tragedy. I hope other female relatives are screened for a genetic link. Those that were permitted to be born, that is.
I hated seeing this front page treatment of her death by the N & O. They already ran it yesterday in the obituaries. It was underneath an article about churches and the loss of revenue from last week’s snowstorm which closed some churches. On the last page of the paper was an article about how the Cit of Apex decided not to include elective abortions as part of it’s health insurance for employees plan. I doubt the N & O would provide front page treatment of the death of a pro-life advocate. I also doubt they would put a pro-abortion article on the back page.
Say hello to George Tiller down there Susan.
In 1990 or 1991, the word went out from the NYT, via their stylebook, that “abortion” was to be replaced with “abortion rights.”
Of course, it’s tendentious. And they like that.
Also, it makes sure there’s always that word “rights,” so the word “abortion” is never left just hanging out there, drawing attention.
It really infuriates me every time I see a pro-life writer using “abortion rights” when what is clearly meant is “abortion.” As in, “Ted Kennedy, who is now dead, was, before his death, a tireless promoter of abortion rights.”
At the same time, the NYT decreed that pro-lifers were to be called “anti-abortion,” as in “anti-abortion campaigners,” etc. The idea was to make pro-lifers simply “against” something. As we all know, merely being “against” is a Bad Thing.
This led the newspapers to call people who were arrested trying to rescue someone scheduled for euthanasia “anti-abortion,” rather than “pro-life” activists.
In the last few years, pro-lifer are usually “anti-abortion-rights” activists, campaigners, etc. Of all the things to be against, the very worst thing to be against is “rights.”
Oh, yes, there ARE decrees that go out, and the drones fall in line.
She made a lot of money killing babies. She must have been happy.
Interesting. I had heard of the link between abortion and breast cancer before. Now is it possible to sue all abortionists for damages if they fail to warn women about the increased risk of breast cancer? I would think it would be same as the warnings for tobacco. Has Big Media ever published or aired anything at all about the risk? Somehow I think the diehard, abortion-rights activists who are very influential in the media want to keep this hushed up.
You never knew a soldier, marine or police person?
I had a short conversation last night in freepmail with a poster about words and euphemisms being used. The left loves to use them.
To boost profits under the guise of "rights", those poor women are told nothing of the countless dangers, lifetime health risks or sentient life inside their womb.
Karma is a bit**
Abortion CAUSES breast cancer!
BC&Abortion?
Yep, one side effect of killing your baby. Lose a Breast.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.