Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Quo Warranto is being filed today in DC (re: Taitz v Obama)
Google Docs ^ | 1/25/2010 | Taitz

Posted on 01/25/2010 5:56:50 PM PST by rxsid

Quo Warranto is being filed today in DC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Dr. ORLY TAITZ, PRO SE Plaintiff

v.

Barack Hussein Obama, Defendant.

 

Jurisdiction

The court has jurisdiction under DC statute §§16-3501- 16-3503. Federal court is proper as diversity between the parties exist and the case revolves around the Federal Question of eligibility of the President under Quo Warranto.

Parties

[snip] From birth and until now Mr. Obama had citizenship of and allegiance to three other nations: Great Britain, Kenya and Indonesia.

Standing

Taitz is an attorney and has submitted request to Attorney General Eric Holder and US attorney for the District of Columbia Jeffrey Taylor to file Quo Warranto, to ascertain Obama’s legitimacy for presidency . After 9 months of waiting she did not receive any response from either Attorney General or US attorney for the district of Columbia. She is seeking an ex-relator status to proceed with Quo Warranto. [snip]

Continued: http://docs.google.com/View?id=dgv5c76f_1c5rt7dd5

(Excerpt) Read more at docs.google.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; eligibility; ineligible; naturalborn; naturalborncitizen; obama; orly; orlytaitz; quowarranto; qw; taitz; whackamole
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-117 next last
Note: The original source is Dr. Taitz's web site, which direct linking to is not allowed per FR rules.
1 posted on 01/25/2010 5:56:53 PM PST by rxsid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LucyT; BP2; STARWISE; Red Steel; pissant; hoosiermama; null and void; Amityschild; Calpernia; ...
Ping!

"Quo Warranto is being filed today in DC"

2 posted on 01/25/2010 5:58:00 PM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Yeah, baby. See tagline.


3 posted on 01/25/2010 6:00:53 PM PST by circumbendibus (Obama is an unconstitutional illegal putative president. Quo Warranto in 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

bump


4 posted on 01/25/2010 6:03:37 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

keep plugging. One day we may find an honest judge with some balls.


5 posted on 01/25/2010 6:04:04 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Mark my words. Orly Taitz is doing this to turn quo warranto into a freak show and discredit its merits. She had the opportunity (and was advised) to file quo warranto months and months ago. She’s doing it NOW because she intends to perform her usual circus tricks and make a mockery of the process. Once people find out that SHE’S involved with a quo warranto proceeding, they’ll automatically dismiss it as a joke.


6 posted on 01/25/2010 6:07:18 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Honesty, Character, & Loyalty still matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Isn’t this kind of like requesting that the Mob perform a self audit on all of it’s illegal activities?

Like Holder is going to even respond???

Time to put a flak jacket on that pig.


7 posted on 01/25/2010 6:08:45 PM PST by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Obummer is already saying he may not run for a 2nd term...in so many words.


8 posted on 01/25/2010 6:09:09 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
keep plugging. One day we may find an honest judge with some balls.

I suggest finding a competent attorney with some brains first.

9 posted on 01/25/2010 6:12:02 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

10 posted on 01/25/2010 6:16:59 PM PST by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

11 posted on 01/25/2010 6:18:01 PM PST by WackySam (To argue with a man who has renounced his reason is like giving medicine to the dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

http://www.constitution.org/writ/quo_warranto.htm


12 posted on 01/25/2010 6:28:40 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Question please,

Why are you so down on her for what she doing?


13 posted on 01/25/2010 6:41:59 PM PST by Calif4Palin (Proud Moosehead....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

bump


14 posted on 01/25/2010 6:46:56 PM PST by tutstar (Baptist Ping list - freepmail me to get on or off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

who is doing the pings while lucyt’s pc is down?


15 posted on 01/25/2010 6:50:31 PM PST by tutstar (Baptist Ping list - freepmail me to get on or off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Pretty sure a quo warranto action only (validly) may be maintained by someone who is asserting HE should hold the office instead. Taitz isn’t asserting that.


16 posted on 01/25/2010 6:52:26 PM PST by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calif4Palin

She’s a dentist and she passed the CA state bar exam. So the English language cannot possibly be hindering her intellectual abilities. Yet, time after time after time, she displays complete incompetence and stupidity to the point of putting her law license in jeopardy, getting herself fined, and being laughed out of court.

She’s an attention whore and mentally ill or she’s a deliberate freak show created by the liberals to embarrass the eligibility issue. Maybe both.


17 posted on 01/25/2010 6:52:58 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Honesty, Character, & Loyalty still matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

I agree. Taitz is a buffoon. But my question is ....”Where is Donofrio’s Quo Warranto?” re the Chrysler case? When I heard rumblings of her filing in DC over a month ago I prayed that Donofrio would file first, thus the focus might be on his Quo Warranto instead of Taitz’s.

LEO: H-E-L-P!!!


18 posted on 01/25/2010 6:53:53 PM PST by raymcc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
One of the main obstacles to a filing like this is demonstrating standing, in terms acceptable to the legal system. Surely, as a trained attorney, Orly knows this.

But her pleading is another story. A recitation of anecdotes, does not amount to standing. A case for damages for personal injury would be another type of filing altogether!

From the document posted online:

Standing

"Taitz is an attorney and has submitted request to Attorney General Eric Holder and US attorney for the District of Columbia Jeffrey Taylor to file Quo Warranto, to ascertain Obama’s legitimacy for presidency . After 9 months of waiting she did not receive any response from either Attorney General or US attorney for the district of Columbia. She is seeking an ex-relator status to proceed with Quo Warranto."

"Taitz tried to ascertain Obama’s legitimacy for presidency and as an attorney representing her clients, she brought a number of legal actions seeking a judicial resolution of this issue. She was subjected to vicious attacks coming from the media acting as regime official propaganda, from Obama’s supporters and from some judiciary, acting as tools to silence her and intimidate her into dropping her legal actions. She was subjected to numerous death threats, tampering with her car, when a fumes emissions hose was disconnected and hot combustible fumes were going back to the engine, as she was driving with her three children in the car. Several convicted criminals and document forgers were working in concert and appear to be following the same instructions, submited perjured affidavits to court and forged her signature, in an attempt to influence the judiciary and undermine her in the eyes of the community and undermine her law license. Her foundation web site was repeatedly hacked and destroyed. Her paypal account was tampered with. On 01.21.09. her case Lightfoot v Bowen was erased from the docket of the Supreme Court of the United States only two days before it was supposed to be heard in conference by all nine justices."

"For a year and a half after repeated complaints to law enforcement she could not get any assistance or relief from the law enforcement. When she brought two legal actions in the Middle District of Georgia on behalf of the members of the US military, as a form of intimidation and retaliation, she was sanctioned $20,000. Taitz is seeking not only verification of Obama’s legitimacy under Quo Warranto, but financial compensation for damages suffered as well as compensation for the severe emotional distress."

19 posted on 01/25/2010 7:04:20 PM PST by research99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Maybe she’s a false flag operation. Seems to be helping out the cause while in truth sabotaging it by innocent-looking incompetence.


20 posted on 01/25/2010 7:04:38 PM PST by MilicaBee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: raymcc

He and Pidgeon had to file the bankruptcy appeal first. I was wishing the same thing about Leo filing before Orly. He has to be thorough and do things in the proper order and timeframe for the good of his clients though. So, there’s nothing to do but wait.


21 posted on 01/25/2010 7:05:34 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Honesty, Character, & Loyalty still matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan
You were saying ...

She’s an attention whore and mentally ill or she’s a deliberate freak show created by the liberals to embarrass the eligibility issue. Maybe both.

Well..., when you see who hired her... :-)


That was pretty smart, getting Orly Taitz to work for you...


22 posted on 01/25/2010 7:08:38 PM PST by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan; All

are you looking in the mirror when you say all this?


23 posted on 01/25/2010 7:10:55 PM PST by FARS ( Be well, be happy and THRIVE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: pogo101

Your understanding is incorrect. Quo warranto exists for the sole purpose of examining by what right an Executive branch member holds his or her office.


24 posted on 01/25/2010 7:11:58 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Honesty, Character, & Loyalty still matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

No doubt. And saddest of all is that some of our fellow FReepers have been fallen for her pathetic freak show and continue to defend her to the end.


25 posted on 01/25/2010 7:17:28 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Honesty, Character, & Loyalty still matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: research99

Maybe the government should sue Taitz on behalf of the American people for the emotional distress to which she’s subjected us through her traveling freak show.

I’m only half kidding.


26 posted on 01/25/2010 7:25:49 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Honesty, Character, & Loyalty still matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp; Danae; STARWISE; pissant

Your comments are invited.


27 posted on 01/25/2010 8:25:41 PM PST by circumbendibus (Obama is an unconstitutional illegal putative president. Quo Warranto in 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Which is more pathetic. A supposedly deranged dentist-lawyer who ungracefully bulls her way into court to publicize the boy marxist’s ineligibility issue, or the idiots that spend their life energy devoted to bitching and moaning about her every move as if they were paid Obamarrhoids?


28 posted on 01/25/2010 8:34:12 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan; All
Your understanding is incorrect. Quo warranto exists for the sole purpose of examining by what right an Executive branch member holds his or her office.

The way I understand the DC Code (which is codified in Federal law since it is a district), anyone may petition the US Attorney General and/or the US Attorney for the District of Columbia to ask the federal court to issue a writ quo warranto ...

If they both fail to act, the petitioner can then bring the request for the writ quo warranto directly to the federal court ...

It is then up to the court as to whether it accepts the petition ...

29 posted on 01/25/2010 8:45:16 PM PST by Lmo56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

This is really somewhat disturbing. I take this issue very seriously and was absolutely hopeful that a quo warranto approach might work. However, the Taitz sideshow could just detract and derail. I don’t think this is a good development.

Will more competent attorneys do this instead of Taitz? Will her suit mess up any of their ongoing efforts?


30 posted on 01/25/2010 8:46:40 PM PST by Jedidah (Be bold, be sharp, be blunt -- but show a kind conservative heart. The world watches and takes note.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circumbendibus
When Judge Carter suggested to Taitz that the DC Circuit was the correct venue for a QW, I believe that he specifically had in mind the political candidates, such as Taitz’s plaintiff Keyes. Keyes would have the best chance of claiming standing by virtue of being able to claim an “injury in fact” directly attributable to the actions of an ineligible federal officer. That injury would be losing in an election that was won by that ineligible candidate.

Unfortunately, Taitz’s filing once again foolishly insults other members of the federal bench who have properly sanctioned her for going off on them, is disjointed, doesn't appear to be professionally prepared and shows no signs of being filed on behalf of Keyes.

I would guess (not a lawyer) that Taitz has zero chance of getting her QW hearing.

I will continue to wait (in the pumpkin patch with Linus as someone suggested) to see whether it becomes in the best interest of Donofrio’s clients, the Chrysler dealers, for him to file for QW, which may or may not happen.

31 posted on 01/25/2010 9:26:04 PM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: circumbendibus

Well, it will be interesting to see if she gets granted leave and permission to do it. I think Leo is going to have a better shot at it.


32 posted on 01/25/2010 9:30:43 PM PST by Danae (Don't think the Constitution matters? Try living in a country without one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: pissant

With all the cmments being made for and against Dr Taitz it seems to me that there are some good and perhaps some legal issues worth bringing to a final closing of the BHO POTUSA eligibility. As for me there are questions about his eligibility. I would particularly like to know why the congressional resolution that OKed MaCain for POTUSA but did not include BHO even though ,I understand, he co-sponsored and voted for the resolution and tried to piggy-back on the resolution with MaCain. I suspect that to some congress people at the time BHO did not pass Article I Section 8 duty #9 as a natural born citizen. If Dr Taitz’s case settles this quandry for me ,particularly as to what changed in the Constitution since then I can go on to more important things.


33 posted on 01/25/2010 9:39:22 PM PST by noinfringers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
Ping!

"Quo Warranto is being filed today in DC"

*******

1. According to Obama's short form birth certificate that we saw on Obama's own website, Obama was born on Aug. 4 and it was filed on Aug. 8.

2. For comparison purposes, let's look at the Nordyke twins long form Hawaii birth certificates: They were born on Aug. 5---one day after Obama and supposedly in the same Kapiolani hospital---and their birth certificates were filed on Aug. 11,three days AFTER Obama's birth certificate that was filed on Aug. 8.

3. If Obama's birth certificate was filed on Aug. 8, then why does it have a HIGHER number---10641---than the Nordyke twins certificates---10637 and 10638---when the Nordyke twins' certificates have Aug. 11 as the date it was filed?

4. Something doesn't seem right.

5. My point is this: It seems reasonable to me that a file number would be given to a Hawaii birth certificate at the time it was filed with the Hawaii birth records department.

6. Let's use our imagination for a few minutes:

a. Obama's Aug. 4, 1961 Hawaii Kapiolani hospital birth certificate comes into the Hawaii department of birth records. <>

b. Let's look at Obama's birth certificate number that we see on Obama's short form birth certificate that is all over the internet: Did it come from Obama's long form Hawaii birth certificate? Was that long form number put there by the hospital or by the Hawaii government AFTER it received Obama's long form birth certificate from Kapiolani hospital?

c. I don't know, but that would be a non-confidential question that we should pressure Hawaii officials like Dr. Fukino to explain to us.

d. For instance, we could ask the Nordyke twins to pressure Dr. Fukino to explain when someone put the numbers 61-10637 and 61-10638 on the top of their Hawaii birth certificates we see on the internet: Were they placed there by Kapiolani hospital or by the Hawaii government AFTER it received the Nordykes' birth certificates from Kapiolani hospital.

e. Let's go back to using our imagination a little bit: The Hawaii government clerk receives Obama's Kapiolani hospital birth certificate.

f. It seems logical to me that the clerk would give Obama's birth certificate a file number on the date it was filed: According to Obama's short form birth certificate we see all over the internet, Obama's birth certificate number was filed on Aug. 8, and the number is 1961-10641.

g. Seems like a pretty routine bureaucratic process to me.

h. But, to me, there is a problem with the routine scenario above: It is the filing of the Nordyke twins' birth certificates. The Nordyke twins supposedly were born in the same Kapiolani hospital as Obama but one day later on Aug. 5.

i. My point is this: If the Obama certificate was filed EARLIER than the Nordyke twins' certificate, then it seems reasonable to me to expect that the Obama certificate would receive a LOWER number than the Nordyke twins, because Obama was born one day earlier in the same hospital as the Nordyke twins.

j. This confusion is why we need Hawaii officials like Dr. Fukino to explain why Obama received a HIGHER number than the Nordyke twins, when supposedly Obama was born a day Earlier than the Nordyke twins.

k. Who has "standing"? Obviously, the Nordyke twins have standing to ask questions about their own 1961, birth certificates. That is, Hawaii officials like Dr. Fukino cannot tell the Nordyke twins that she can't talk about their own 1961 Hawaii birth certificates because of confidential rules or because the Nordyke twins have no standing when it comes to asking questions about their own birth certificates.

NOTE: As I see it, the Nordyke twins could request in writing or ask in person about details in their own birth certificates, and I don't see how Hawaii officials like Dr. Fukino could refuse to answer the questions in the twins letter or if the twins asked for information in person, or if the twins' lawyer asked the Hawaii officials to answer questions about the Nordyke 1961 long form Hawaii birth certificates.

l. So, I wish that the Nordyke twins could be persuaded to ask Hawaii officials the following questions.

Did the hospital or the Hawaii government put the numbers 61-10637 and 61-10638 on the top of the certificates?

m. If the Nordyke twins could help us, it would go a long way in helping us to prove or disapprove that Obama was born in Kapiolani hospital like Obama's supporters claim.

7. Obama supporters expect me to believe that this is what happened to Obama's Aug.4, 1961 birth certificate when it arrived at the Hawaii department of birth records:

a. Aug. 8 file date: Obama's Aug. 4 birth certificate record is filed by a clerk at the Hawaii birth records on Aug. 8, if we are to believe what we see on Obama's short form birth certificate that we see all over the internet.

b. The Obama supporters expect us to believe that the clerk, either on purpose or by mistake, does not stamp file number 61-10641 on Obama's long form birth certificate UNTIL a few days after he puts a file date on it.

c. The problem with the Obama supporters' theory above is this: The Nordyke twins were born in the same Kapiolani hospital where Obama was supposedly born but a day later on Aug. 5.

d. So the following scenario is difficult for me to believe:

A Hawaii government clerk files the Nordyke birth certificates on Aug. 11 but somehow gives them lower numbers than Obama---61-10637 and 61-10638 vs. 10641.

However, for some unknown reason, the clerk turns around a few days later and gives Obama the number 1961-10641, which is 3 numbers HIGHER than the Nordykes'number.

It makes no sense to me that the Hawaii government would file a birh certificate on Aug. 8 but wait to put number 1961-10641 on it until AFTER birth certificates that were filed on Aug.11--the Nordyke twins Aug. 5 birth certificates---were given the numbers 61-10637 and 61-10638.

To help us clear up this Obama/Nordyke confusion, we need the Nordyke twins to ask Hawaii officials like Dr. Fukino to explain in detail what each item and what each number means in their birth certificates.

I hope that the Nordyke twins, who obviously have "standing" to ask the Hawaii government about details on there own birth certificates, can help us solve the question as to why Obama's birth certificate shows a higher number than their birth certificates.

34 posted on 01/25/2010 9:43:56 PM PST by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan; rxsid

ZERO-Distractor as usual!!!


35 posted on 01/25/2010 9:52:51 PM PST by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Have paid anything yet to F.R.???


36 posted on 01/25/2010 9:54:23 PM PST by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Calif4Palin

He said one time it was only for his entertainment!!!


37 posted on 01/25/2010 9:56:49 PM PST by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan; Calif4Palin

Hey Buck, if you are so clever and competent, why don’t you step up to the plate and show us how it is done???


38 posted on 01/25/2010 10:00:20 PM PST by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: danamco

It’s easier to be a guttersnipe.


39 posted on 01/25/2010 11:25:32 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

She may be a lousy lawyer ....but she sure did a good job on my teeth

40 posted on 01/25/2010 11:33:41 PM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: woofie
A typical Orly troll

41 posted on 01/25/2010 11:40:54 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: danamco
Have paid anything yet to F.R.???

Yes. Has Orly?

42 posted on 01/26/2010 4:04:09 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: research99
Surely, as a trained attorney, Orly knows this.

Probably, as an incompetent attorney, Orly does not.

43 posted on 01/26/2010 4:06:45 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: pissant
A supposedly deranged dentist-lawyer who ungracefully bulls her way into court to publicize the boy marxist’s ineligibility issue, or the idiots that spend their life energy devoted to bitching and moaning about her every move as if they were paid Obamarrhoids?

Watching the antics of the doofus lawyer is way more fun.

44 posted on 01/26/2010 4:10:18 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
It’s easier to be a guttersnipe.

I can't imagine how hard it must be to blindly support someone as stupid as Orly Taitz and to worship the ground she walks on.

45 posted on 01/26/2010 4:12:15 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

I really think that all it would take to stop him would be for one state to require proof of natural born citizenship before allowing him on the ballot.


46 posted on 01/26/2010 5:02:12 AM PST by FreedomPoster (No Representation without Taxation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

The typical Taitz package of crazy.


47 posted on 01/26/2010 5:08:52 AM PST by browardchad ("Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own fact." - Daniel P Moynihan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: john mirse

If you then add 39 different Social Security numbers, and a fake COLB, then you may have the answer???


48 posted on 01/26/2010 6:12:19 AM PST by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Please add me to the BC ping list, if there is one.


49 posted on 01/26/2010 6:14:26 AM PST by esquirette (If we do not know our own worldview, we will accept theirs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: esquirette
You were saying ...

Please add me to the BC ping list, if there is one.

There may be a ping list around, but you can do it yourself... :-)

Just click on the following link -- "certifigate" -- keyword on Free Republic.

50 posted on 01/26/2010 8:44:30 AM PST by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson