EDITORIAL: Obama's risky-sex czar

The Washington Times ^ | December 9, 2009

[R4Roger05]

WARNING: This editorial includes discussion of topics that are sexually graphic. Under usual circumstances, we would never entertain these subjects or the rancid language involved. In this case, however, a very unusual exception must be made because the issues are central to the background of a senior presidential appointee at the U.S. Department of Education who is in a position to influence how and what our children are taught in our nation's schools. Thus far, out of fear or squeamishness, there has been public hesitance to examine closely the beliefs of this individual because many are afraid even to touch the risky content. Our scruples cannot be used against us when traditional moral precepts need to be defended. Simply, the deep level of depravity involved in this subject cannot be portrayed without providing a couple of examples to illustrate the inappropriate content. Please do not read any further if you will be offended by sexually graphic language.

The Obama administration is stonewalling serious inquiries about sexual filth propagated by a senior presidential appointee who is responsible for promoting and implementing federal education policy. Democrats clearly are terrified of ruffling the feathers of their activist homosexual supporters, who are an influential part of the Democratic party's base. This scandal, however, is not merely about homosexual behavior; it is about promoting sex between children and adults - and it's time for President Obama to make clear that abetting such illegal perversion has no place in his administration.

[Marty62]

Way to go Times.
Shove it in the Peoples face.
If they get upset about the editorial, ask them IF they understand this is what their CHILDREN are subjected to with this admiistration.

[Mrs. Don-o]

Note

[<1/1,000,000th%]

If it’s ok to say this to the kids, it must be ok to say this to the parents, right?

[Britt0n]

Parents put their children in the immoral public schools at their own peril.

[FrankR]

"...and it's time for President Obama to make clear that abetting such illegal perversion has no place in his administration."

A good reporter would ask him, "Mr. President, would you let this new "czar" baby-sit your daughters?"

We need to have a National Parent/Student boycott of the public schools until they get rid of the pervert education czar.

We are being ruled by radicals, and that means radical action is needed to protect our freedoms.

[RegulatorCountry]

"Mr. President, would you let this new "czar" baby-sit your daughters?"

Well, considering just who "babysat" him, you might not like the answer to your question.

[a fool in paradise]

Will Kevin Jennings be passing these out in public schools?

[a fool in paradise]

If they pass these out in schools, I say use them the next time you shake hands with a politician.

[a fool in paradise]

and it's time for President Obama to make clear that abetting such illegal perversion has no place in his administration.

Actually the activist supreme court decided in Lawrence v. Texas that it was not illegal or perverse and despite the claims from the lavender mafia, it was not just about consenting ADULTS in PRIVATE. Here it is being brought to SCHOOLCHILDREN in PUBLIC.

[surfer]

Well they could be handy on keeping prints off certain persausive elements... :)

[a fool in paradise]

If President Clintoon had practiced safe secks, there wouldn’t have been any DNA stains on Monica’s blew dress.

[henkster]

I was a prosecutor for 18 years, so I consider myself a pretty worldly and jaded guy. But at no point will I ever believe that this regime is beyond shocking me. Every day brings something new and more revolting than the day before.

[FrankR]

"Well, considering just who "babysat" him, you might not like the answer to your question. "

The point being, the question needs to be asked.

I'm not real big on excusing adult bad behavior based on something that happened in childhood. He's an adult now, and if had the wherewithall to make it through Harvard, become a community organzier, a senator, and now president, SURELY he has been exposed to what is "right" and what is "wrong"...something many of us learned watching "Sesame Street".

Whether is was obama, Tiger, or Michael Jackson...childhood is childhood, and adulthood is adulthood, and if they get the two totally confused, there are institutions that help people with things like that.

I'm not saying that childhood trauma doesn't affect who we are...but adulthood and maturity should come into play to control any of those impulses...or...they need to check in to one of those instiutions for help.

[Gene Eric]

>> the next time you shake hands with a politician.

I can think of no reason why that would be necessary or desirable.

[<1/1,000,000th%]

LOL!

I like that idea.

[surfer]

Yeah but IowaHawk educated everyone on the stained Barney jumper so one way or another this stuff still gets out :)

[a fool in paradise]

Whether Obama was molested or not, it is clear he was raised as a Red Diaper Doper Baby.

[a fool in paradise]

The Golden Child of 60s radicalism.

[mlizzy]

Thanks Mrs. Don-O; I was pleased to read this article (even a family orientated newspaper sees the importance of getting this info out) and they issued a bolded warning that should suffice with those who don't want to read this kind of material.

We have to pray this damaging stuff out of office (in addition to letter writing, protesting, etc.).