While the poorer agrarian nations are sidelines, the wealthier industrialized nations enrich themselves by means of Copenhagen.
To: myknowledge
To: myknowledge
My interpretation is: The dictatorships of the world demand that the wealthy democracies support them in the manner in which they wish to become accustomed.
3 posted on
12/08/2009 6:18:57 PM PST by
marktwain
To: myknowledge
This sounds like a fake leak (by the UN and its ilk) to shame the “rich” countries — US, Australia, etc. — into signing something along the lines of the original Copenhagen treaty.
4 posted on
12/08/2009 6:19:25 PM PST by
MilicaBee
To: myknowledge
Oxfam's climate change advisor Antonio Hill says the sidelining of the UN in future negotiations is particularly troubling. "What it reflects is what you can expect at this stage in the game - when the elephant's in the room the ants get squeezed out," he said.Is it possible that gibbering idiots like Oxfam still believe that socialist psychopaths actually give a sh*t about poor people? Pathetic. That just ain't what socialism is all about, dickweeds.
To: myknowledge
Oath Keeper comes to mind.
8 posted on
12/08/2009 6:27:33 PM PST by
Tigen
(I shall raise you one .)
To: 75thOVI; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; BBell; ...
...a draft final agreement which weakens the role of the United Nations in climate change negotiations and abandons the Kyoto Protocol...
Gore didn't want to cut anyone in on his carbon credit scam.
9 posted on
12/08/2009 6:30:45 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: myknowledge
Now give us back our light bulbs!!
11 posted on
12/08/2009 6:32:22 PM PST by
ditto h
To: myknowledge
I don’t know if this is for real or not but if it damages Copenhagen, then I’m happy.
To: myknowledge
14 posted on
12/08/2009 6:59:36 PM PST by
Racer1
To: myknowledge
"At least $200 billion is needed every year by 2020 to allow developing countries to cope with climate changes that are already inevitable, and secondly to join the international effort to actually slash emissions." Where were these needs 2000 years ago, or 1500 years ago - when there were some significant climate changes LONG before mankind had even an inkling of a self-agrandizing thought he could affect the global climate? Who was paying for the poor underdeveloped countries to "cope with climate change"????
This is the biggest pile of hogwash ever. And the climate-change fanatics are insane.
How much can I squeeze out of the world with my Global Warming Climate Change Scheme????!!!!
$300 BILLION????!!!!!!
15 posted on
12/08/2009 7:30:02 PM PST by
TheBattman
(They exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature...)
To: myknowledge
"And finally on the legal form, making sure that everyone is clear that a legally binding agreement is on the table and will be on the table right until the last minute here in Copenhagen." The American people will never agree to be held to the UN's "legally binding agreement" under any circumstances. We will revolt first, and throw that corrupt body right out of our country, if it comes down to it.
I just love how these globalists think they can force the sovereign people of this republic to surrender our constitutionally guaranteed liberties to them on the strength of a piece of worthless paper, signed by a roomful of criminals.
17 posted on
12/08/2009 7:34:04 PM PST by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: myknowledge
Now that Russia is a “poorer nation”, but rich in hydrocarbons, would there be any incentive for the FSB (ne KGB, ne NKVD) to reveal the hoax that is Anthropomorphic Global Warming (AGW)?
18 posted on
12/08/2009 7:49:51 PM PST by
SubMareener
(Become a monthly donor! Free FreeRepublic.com from Quarterly FReepathons!)
To: myknowledge
19 posted on
12/08/2009 8:44:18 PM PST by
CottShop
(Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
To: myknowledge
Sidelining of the UN? Sounds too good to be true.
Therefore.... I’ll believe it when I see it with my own eyes.
20 posted on
12/08/2009 9:04:29 PM PST by
XenaLee
To: myknowledge
No matter what they do, it’s all crap!
The base premise is false, thus, garbage in - garbage out.
21 posted on
12/08/2009 10:06:13 PM PST by
editor-surveyor
(The beginning of the O'Bomb-a administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
To: myknowledge
What? The third world thought it was going to get something for nothing?
It just thought that the rich, white liberal elites in the West were honestly going to give them something for free?
This is what liberalism is: a handful of people telling everyone else what to do.
22 posted on
12/09/2009 12:50:11 AM PST by
Tzimisce
(No thanks. We have enough government already. - The Tick)
To: myknowledge; livius; DollyCali; According2RecentPollsAirIsGood; Thunder90; Little Bill; ...
24 posted on
12/09/2009 2:00:15 AM PST by
steelyourfaith
(Time to prosecute Al Gore now that fellow scam artist Bernie Madoff is in stir.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson