Skip to comments.
Washington Post : E-mails Don't Prove Warming is a Fraud
Washington Post via RealClearPolitics ^
| 11/27/2009
| Eugene Robinson
Posted on 11/27/2009 7:49:12 AM PST by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-109 next last
Of course the author ends with this paragraph which in effect "favors" global warming advocates :
"It would be great if this were all a big misunderstanding. But we know carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas, and we know the planet is hotter than it was a century ago. The skeptics might have convinced each other, but so far they haven't gotten through to the vanishing polar ice."
IT's ALWAYS ABOUT THE VANISHING POLAR ICE or THE VANISHING SNOW AT THE TOP OF MOUNT KILIMANJARO.
To: SeekAndFind
LA LA LA LA LA...I CAN’T HEAR YOU!!!!
Washington Compost: “Evidence of massive fraud means there is no massive fraud.”
2
posted on
11/27/2009 7:52:55 AM PST
by
FormerACLUmember
(Socialism is an opportunistic infection of the body politic. It occurs when defenses are low.)
To: SeekAndFind
Follow the money, Global Warming is too good a vehicle for getting grants and applying total govt control.
3
posted on
11/27/2009 7:53:05 AM PST
by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: SeekAndFind
The author:
"I can't hear you LA LA LA!"
4
posted on
11/27/2009 7:53:56 AM PST
by
capt. norm
(Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups.)
To: SeekAndFind
does not prove that global warming is a fraud. If I'm wrong, somebody ought to tell the polar ice caps that they're free to stop melting. So....they're back to confusing climate change(a natural phenomena) with man-made climate change (a fraud).
Kinda how the Obama supporters keep trying to play the race card.
5
posted on
11/27/2009 7:54:21 AM PST
by
BenLurkin
To: FormerACLUmember
Well, what about the polar ice caps and Mt. Kilimanjaro’s vanishing snow ?
To: SeekAndFind
If I'm wrong, somebody ought to tell the polar ice caps that they're free to stop melting. They've stopped melting (see diagram below). And even if they were melting, that would simply mean that the climate was getting warmer, just as it did in the Medieval Warm Period. The article writer needs to find out what the word "Anthropogenic" means.
To: SeekAndFind
Stop hyperventilating, all you climate change deniers. The purloined e-mail correspondence published by skeptics last week -- portraying some leading climate researchers as petty, vindictive and tremendously eager to make their data fit accepted theories -- does not prove that global warming is a fraud. Try "fair and balanced" once and see how it works out for you Washington Post.
You may find that you like it.
8
posted on
11/27/2009 7:55:21 AM PST
by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: SeekAndFind
If I'm wrong, somebody ought to tell the polar ice caps that they're free to stop melting. Caught cooking data to shape the conclusion.....
.....they make this claim as if the climate has always been a constant.
The climate has never been constant. A real scientist should know this.
9
posted on
11/27/2009 7:55:27 AM PST
by
SteamShovel
(When hope trumps reality, there is no hope at all.)
To: SeekAndFind; rlmorel; Nervous Tick; 4horses+amule; WL-law; Fractal Trader; Beowulf; ...
10
posted on
11/27/2009 7:55:35 AM PST
by
steelyourfaith
(Time to prosecute Al Gore now that fellow scam artist Bernie Madoff is in stir.)
To: SeekAndFind
Not wrong... just too stupid to understand the truth...
11
posted on
11/27/2009 7:55:41 AM PST
by
xcamel
(The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
To: SeekAndFind
If I'm wrong, somebody ought to tell the polar ice caps that they're free to stop melting.In fact, you are wrong, Mr. Don't Bother Me With Facts Robinson - a huge part of the climate change fraud is the unfounded claim that the planet is warmer now than any time during the last 2000 years. But people like you continue to use misdirection to confuse the issue and to gloss over the importance of these emails...
12
posted on
11/27/2009 7:55:59 AM PST
by
Zeppo
(Save the cheerleader, save the world...)
To: SeekAndFind
eugene robinson, who wrote this opinion article, is merely an apologist for his discredited, hokey religion of environmentalism.
13
posted on
11/27/2009 7:56:40 AM PST
by
Vision Thing
(He has a white house, and he wants to paint it black.)
To: SeekAndFind
....ahhh! the WaPo swings into predictably into action defending the Chicken Littles of global warming....get ready for a similar barrage from the NY Times and LA Times with CBS/NBC/PBS/ABC chiming in.
To: SeekAndFind
The Titanic (global warming) sinking while the MSM band plays on:
15
posted on
11/27/2009 7:57:11 AM PST
by
capt. norm
(Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups.)
To: SeekAndFind
Uh, My name is Eugene.
I stick my hand in fans for fun!
To: SeekAndFind
Does sort of remind me of the various statements by Dan Rather when the "discovery of the letters regarding 'W's' National Guard were forged, something akin to, "they might be forged, but they're
still true!"If this type of thinking isn't mentally unbalanced, it's very close.
17
posted on
11/27/2009 7:57:47 AM PST
by
zerosix
(native sunflower)
To: SeekAndFind
The purloined e-mail correspondence published by skeptics last week -- portraying some leading climate researchers as petty, vindictive and tremendously eager to make their data fit accepted theories -- does not prove that global warming is a fraud. And Mary Mapes says we never proved the TANG memos were bogus. Typical liberal last line of defense - demand we prove a negative. Which means we're winning, because only the hardcores accept such a line of defense. The rest recognize such as pure BS and deflection.
18
posted on
11/27/2009 7:57:53 AM PST
by
dirtboy
To: SeekAndFind
He's is correct it isn't a fraud...It's a scam with a dash of conspiracy.
19
posted on
11/27/2009 7:58:00 AM PST
by
darkwing104
(Lets get dangerous)
To: FormerACLUmember
Yep, who are you gonna believe the contents of the emails or the WaPo spin?
20
posted on
11/27/2009 7:58:17 AM PST
by
Let's Roll
(Stop paying ACORN to destroy America! Cut off their government funding!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-109 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson