Beam me to Planet Gore !
Posted on 11/26/2009 4:05:23 AM PST by steelyourfaith
The world's oceans, which normally gobble up carbon dioxide, are getting stuffed to the gills, according to the most thorough study to date of human-made carbon in the seas.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.nationalgeographic.com ...
I guess I missed the explanation for how CULDEO is able distinguish "human-made carbon" (small point: humans don't make carbon, though they can release it) from other carbon.
Perhaps this explains the earth's eleven year cooling cycle?
Hmmmm, where the funding for this research originates. A government grant, perhaps? Just wondering.
Liar, liar, pants on fire, your nose is longer than a telephone wire.
National Geographic again. This is why I let my subscription lapse. Every single story had some sort of Climate Change propaganda in it.
So how are we doing this, farting in lakes and swimming pools?
I don’t believe anything they say any more on the subject of climate and weather.
When weather.com says it’s raining, you bet your sweet a$$ I look out the window and check for myself.
They are a pack of cheats, frauds and liars, all of them.
I just love making bubbles with farts.
“Every single story had some sort of Climate Change propaganda in it.”
The leftards have slimed their way into every crook and nanny of our world.
So, how do we get them out?
Of course they get their statistics from the same place the Gooberment gets theirs: they make them up.
Good, that will leave more plant food for our crops.
I’d also like to know how they can determine the carbon source is human.
I can hear it now... Save the oceans! Now they’re the victims. Taxes will solve everything, and Pelosi will personally clean the oceans for us.
Its too bad, Nat Geo used to be one of the great magazines for scientific reading.
Well well the Little boy who cried Wolf, (Algore)for a profit. Now ANY data will be looked at with a skeptisisum that may not be warrented. Maybe they need to triple check and then recheck to make sure that no one has a “personnal”$$$$$$$$$$agenda laced into their findings????????????
Old Joke:
Guy in hotel bathtub orders a sandwich from room sevice.
Bell boy arrives with sandwich and a few minutes later comes back with a bottle of beer.
Guys says, "I didn't order a beer."
Bell boy tells him yes you did, as I was leaving you said, "Hey bud bring me a bottle of Budweiser"
Same goes for Scientific American
Clearly, the green revolution in agriculture has already benefitted from CO2 fertilization, and benefits in the future will be even greater. Animal life is increasing proportionally, as shown by studies of 51 terrestrial (120) and 22 aquatic ecosystems (121). Moreover, as shown by a study of 94 terrestrial ecosystems on all continents except Antarctica (122), species richness – biodiversity – is more positively correlated with productivity – the total quantity of plant life per acre – than with anything else.
Atmospheric CO2 is required for life by both plants and animals. It is the sole source of carbon in all of the protein, carbohydrate, fat, and other organic molecules of which living things are constructed.
Plants extract carbon from atmospheric CO2 and are thereby fertilized. Animals obtain their carbon from plants. Without atmospheric CO2, none of the life we see on Earth would exist.
Water, oxygen, and carbon dioxide are the three most important substances that make life possible.
They are surely not environmental pollutants.
Post 17 quoted from here http://www.oism.org/pproject/s33p36.htm
There is such a thing? If so, I expect it's related to the eleven year sunspot cycle.
tga
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.