Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Was There an Oswald/Ruby Cover-Up? Did the Mob Kill JFK? premieres November 22
TV By The Numbers ^ | 11/12/09 | Discovery Channe;

Posted on 11/20/2009 11:29:24 AM PST by AtlasStalled

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-169 last
To: Tublecane
Ok. You can think what you wish. I'll rely on my uncles Vinnie and Frankie to get my information.
161 posted on 12/07/2009 4:18:21 PM PST by svcw (The time is near at hand which must determine whether Americans are to be free men or slaves. GW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane
“Two seperate shooters just happen to decide to show up same day, same place? The odds must be astronomical.”

I don't think the odds are that long. FBI files indicate that several different groups had been stalking JFK for three or four months on the many trips he took leading up to the one in Dallas. What's your theory: that Oswald was a lone nutcase who fired a lucky shot (or two) and then himself was shot by another lone nutcase, Ruby? That seems even more far-fetched to me.

162 posted on 12/28/2009 3:15:54 PM PST by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: riverdawg

“What’s your theory: that Oswald was a lone nutcase who fired a lucky shot (or two) and then himself was shot by another lone nutcase, Ruby? That seems even more far-fetched to me.”

Why? Someone shooting the president somewhere—the Oswald factor—isn’t any kind of longshot. The shooter being a lone nut is actually rather common. Also, the shots weren’t “lucky”. They were easy. And he missed twice.

As for Ruby, once the Oswald factor has occured, it’s not very unlikely. I mean, I don’t know the odds on someone being killed while in police custody, but if there’s going to be vigilante justice, he’s most likely going to go after a big news item and will most likely be a nut. In other words, once the Oswald thing happens, the Ruby thing is much more likely to follow.

What you don’t seem to take into account is that however unlikely it was for what happened to have happened, it is all the more unlikely, by a ridiculous factor, for two people to happen to choose Dallas on that particular day. It’s not even close.


163 posted on 12/28/2009 5:57:41 PM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: riverdawg

“Someone shooting the president somewhere—the Oswald factor—isn’t any kind of longshot”

By which I mean it isn’t any kind of longshot that someone will at some point try to kill, or succeed in killing, the president. It happens a lot:

Killed: Abraham Lincoln, James A. Garfield, William McKinley, John F. Kennedy

Attempted Kills: Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Harry S Truman, John F. Kennedy, Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, George H. W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush

(With the exception of Lincoln, who was killed as part of a wider conspiracy, pretty much all attempts were by so-called lone nuts.)

The odds of it being in Dallas, precisely where Oswald did it, is of course a different matter. But that’s not really what we’re calculating. We’re calculating the odds of two shooters showing up at the same site against Kennedy being killed by a single lone nut (who himself is killed by a lone nut), wherever the place may be.


164 posted on 12/28/2009 6:06:54 PM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: AtlasStalled

I killed JFK. I was only 9 years old at the time but I aimed my sniper rifle from underneath a manhole lid while my co-conspirators took positions from rooftops and grassy knolls. One had a black umbrella. When he folded it, Camelot got it. I hope that settles your doubts.


165 posted on 12/28/2009 6:13:35 PM PST by NightOfTheLivingDems (Destroy the Dems in Two Thousand Ten)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tired1; AtlasStalled; All
I know nothing to speak of about the JFK assassination, other than, of course, that there are a myriad of conspiracy theories surrounding all the circumstances of his death and the follow up.

This morning on NPR, there was BBC report about some longitudinal study about happiness, and that it is presumed that JFK was one of the volunteers for this lifelong psychological study.

What Makes Us Happy? - The Atlantic (June 2009)

http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200906/happiness

Near the end of the broadcast they mentioning that all the remaining participants of this study who were still alive were in their 80s and that one of the agreements of participating in this study was to DONATE YOUR BRAIN after death to the researchers.

Anyway, although I know virtually NOTHING about the JFK conspiracies, even I am aware that some conspiratorial theorists are very concerned that JFK's physical brain remains are missing.

Maybe Harvard has them, and has had them for decades? ALL of the participants were supposed to remain totally anonymous -- maybe legally speaking, they cannot simply state that they have the missing brain --- IF, indeed that is the case.

166 posted on 01/02/2010 6:08:33 AM PST by hennie pennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: hennie pennie

LBJ et al did it

It was a Dallas thing


167 posted on 01/02/2010 6:15:57 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . What ever I do is what shall be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: bert; Quix
From my general understanding there are many theories WHO did it. I don't follow the JFK assassination conspiracies, but I was aware that after his autopsy, the physical remains of his brain disappeared.

Perhaps these scientists at Harvard have had them all along; JFK signed up for this lifelong study when he was a student at Harvard in the 1930s, and at that time, one of the conditions to participate was to have a thorough physical exam which took a very long time as they took measurements of your entire anatomy. Another condition was to donate your brain at death to the researchers in charge of this study.

168 posted on 01/02/2010 6:35:09 AM PST by hennie pennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: hennie pennie

I doubt the Harvard researchers got it.

The PTB did him in . . . he was threatening to disclose things and try to change things they would not tolerate in the least way.

I wouldn’t be surprised at all that LBJ was in on it.

I remember watching his swearing in on the plane in real time when I was in High School.

I knew in my gut he was in on it at the time. I thought then that he was lying slime. That was before I knew so much about him.


169 posted on 01/02/2010 7:10:33 AM PST by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 TRAITORS http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-169 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson