Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Endorses Paid Sick Leave Bill
New York Times ^ | November 11, 2009 | Steven Greenhouse

Posted on 11/11/2009 3:49:51 PM PST by reaganaut1

The H1N1 pandemic is raising concerns about people reporting to work sick and spreading the disease. The pandemic has given momentum to Congressional efforts to enact legislation that would guarantee paid sick days to tens of millions of workers — although it is far from clear that such legislation will be enacted. Those legislative efforts received added momentum on Tuesday when the Obama administration backed the Healthy Families Act, which would guarantee seven sick days a year to workers in companies with 15 or more employees.

In testifying before the Senate Health, Education and Labor Committee’s Subcommittee on Children and Families, Deputy Labor Secretary Seth Harris, said,

The Healthy Families Act offers an important opportunity to provide workers with economic security by assuring that they have the ability to stay home if they are sick without fear of losing their jobs or being forced to go to work sick because they cannot afford to stay home.

Mr. Harris noted that the Bureau of Labor Statistics has found that 39 percent of American workers do not receive paid sick days.

Last May, the Healthy Families Act was introduced in the Senate by Edward M. Kennedy, the Massachusetts Democrat, and in the House by Rosa DeLauro, a Connecticut Democrat. The bill has more than 110 sponsors in the House. In the Senate, Christopher J. Dodd, the Connecticut Democrat, has become the bill’s chief sponsor, and it has more than 20 sponsors.

Last week, Representative George Miller, the California Democrat who is chairman of the House Education and Labor Committee, introduced an emergency bill that would guarantee five paid sick days to employees at businesses with 15 or more workers who are directed to stay home by management because they have or are believed to have H1N1 or another communicable disease.

(Excerpt) Read more at economix.blogs.nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
Paid sick leave is nice. Lots of things are nice. Maybe a time of 10.2% unemployment is not the time to pile on more mandates on employers. How high do the Democrats want unemployment to go?
1 posted on 11/11/2009 3:49:52 PM PST by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

I foresee a lot of companies cutting a week off of the paid time off they already offer their employees.


2 posted on 11/11/2009 3:51:16 PM PST by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (There are only two REAL conservatives in America - myself, and my chosen Presidential candidate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

Most companies of any size offer some amount of paid time off. I don’t think this is a very big deal, except for the fact it is the individual business that should decide this, not the government.


3 posted on 11/11/2009 3:52:33 PM PST by DonaldC (A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Is 10.2% just too low for the ONE?


4 posted on 11/11/2009 3:54:07 PM PST by Mark (Don't argue with my posts. I typed while under sniper fire..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
The H1N1 pandemic

Stopped reading right there. No offense to you, just commenting on something I noticed. I'll read the comments for a more realistic take than the one offered from the NYT.

5 posted on 11/11/2009 3:55:04 PM PST by Carling (Nobelgate: Obama's Waterloo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Great. Just what employers need during a recession. This is just another attack on private industry.


6 posted on 11/11/2009 3:57:05 PM PST by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hsalaw

Dems are going to push everything they can between now and next November. Internally, they must know the slap-down they are getting at the next election.


7 posted on 11/11/2009 3:58:13 PM PST by DonaldC (A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

More insurance for their ‘jobless recovery’ or are they seeking more unemployed to crawl to government’s teat?

There’s already been response here by local business as to layoffs and/or not hiring.


8 posted on 11/11/2009 3:58:44 PM PST by This_far (Mandatory insurance! I thought it was about health care?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

How many included in that 39% do you think are part-time employees? How many work for Wendy’s, McDonald’s, whatever? How much do you think a Wendy’s hamburger will go up if this is passed? Or a McDonald’s Happy Meal? Maybe that $1.00 sandwich will now cost $5.95.

These people want this to happen. It’s not that they’re clueless. The more they grind the economy into the ground, the more reason to take over various parts under government control.


9 posted on 11/11/2009 3:58:55 PM PST by bcsco (Hey, GOP: The American Indians found out what happens when you don't control immigration...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark
Is 10.2% just too low for the ONE?

Apparently.

The Healthy Families Act offers an important opportunity to provide workers with economic security by assuring that they have the ability to stay home since they will be losing their jobs.

There, thats more accurate.

10 posted on 11/11/2009 3:59:10 PM PST by ALPAPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mark
Is 10.2% just too low for the ONE?

Seriously? Yes it is. If unemployment were around 15% for an extended period of time, more Americans would support a more government-dependent life style. Government health care, comes to mind.

11 posted on 11/11/2009 3:59:19 PM PST by Go Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

This bill is just another dagger in the back of small busiensses. Paid sick leave is a good benefit. I think that most larger employers offer the benefit. Small employers can offer the benefit also. However, they may need to reduce compensation to offer the benefit. Do you prefer the benefit with reduced compensation or no benefit with higher compensation? If the policy becomes too much of a burden, the small business can just close. Who needs so many small businesses anyway? Small businesses do not pay livable wages and exploit their endentured workers in the most pathetic ways. Let government fill the need!


12 posted on 11/11/2009 3:59:52 PM PST by businessprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Why only a week?
Let’s make it a month or more.
Don’t be a cheapskate Baraq.


13 posted on 11/11/2009 4:01:12 PM PST by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DonaldC
This will wipe out many small businesses that are struggling to stay afloat. This is happening to millions across the Nation. Insurance, taxes, health care costs and utilities are just about causing most small businesses to actually pay more than they earn just to be in business. hussein's true plan is working faster than I would have ever imagined... most whistle past the grave yard.

LLS

14 posted on 11/11/2009 4:04:46 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (hussama will never be my president... NEVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Make labor dear and you use less of it.


15 posted on 11/11/2009 4:05:11 PM PST by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Representative George Miller, the California Democrat who is chairman of the House Education and Labor Committee is a Marxist and member of the “Congressional Progressive Caucus” a group founded by admitted socialist Bernie Sanders.

Don’t expect to read about that in the NYT.

The following members of Congress are Marxists who have rebranded themselves as “Progressives” in an attempt to hide their agenda

Nancy Pelosi was one of the original members and only left when she was named Minority Leader.

She is now Speaker of the House and 2 heartbeats away from President of the United States.

All members are members of the Democratic Party or caucus with the Democratic Party. There are currently 82 total declared Progressives including 79 voting Representatives, 2 non-voting Delegates, and 1 Senator.
[edit] Arizona

The “Congressional Progressive Caucus”:

* Ed Pastor (AZ-4, Phoenix)
* Raúl Grijalva (AZ-7, Tucson) - Co-Chair

[edit] California

* Lynn Woolsey (CA-6, Santa Rosa) - Co-Chair
* George Miller (CA-7, Richmond) - Chairman, House Education and Labor Committee
* Barbara Lee (CA-9, Oakland) - Chairwoman, Congressional Black Caucus
* Pete Stark (CA-13, Fremont)
* Michael Honda (CA-15, San Jose)
* Sam Farr (CA-17, Monterey)
* Henry Waxman (CA-30, Los Angeles) - Chairman, House Energy and Commerce Committee
* Xavier Becerra (CA-31, Los Angeles)
* Judy Chu (CA-32, El Monte)
* Diane Watson (CA-33, Los Angeles)
* Lucille Roybal-Allard (CA-34, Los Angeles)
* Maxine Waters (CA-35, Inglewood)
* Laura Richardson (CA-37, Long Beach)
* Linda Sanchez (CA-39, Lakewood)
* Bob Filner (CA-51, San Diego) - Chairman, House Veterans Affairs Committee

[edit] Colorado

* Jared Polis (CO-02, Boulder)

[edit] Connecticut

* Rosa DeLauro (CT-3, New Haven)

[edit] Florida

* Corrine Brown (FL-3, Jacksonville)
* Alan Grayson (FL-8, Orlando)
* Robert Wexler (FL-19, Boca Raton)
* Alcee Hastings (FL-23, Fort Lauderdale)

[edit] Georgia

* Hank Johnson (GA-4, Lithonia)
* John Lewis (GA-5, Atlanta)

[edit] Hawaii

* Neil Abercrombie (HI-1, Honolulu)
* Mazie Hirono (HI-2, Honolulu)

[edit] Illinois

* Bobby Rush (IL-1, Chicago)
* Jesse Jackson, Jr. (IL-2, Chicago Heights)
* Luis Gutierrez (IL-4, Chicago)
* Danny Davis (IL-7, Chicago)
* Jan Schakowsky (IL-9, Chicago)
* Phil Hare (IL-17, Rock Island)

[edit] Indiana

* André Carson (IN-7, Indianapolis)

[edit] Iowa

* Dave Loebsack (IA-2, Cedar Rapids)

[edit] Maine

* Chellie Pingree (ME-1, North Haven)

[edit] Maryland

* Donna Edwards (MD-4, Fort Washington)
* Elijah Cummings (MD-7, Baltimore)

[edit] Massachusetts

* John Olver (MA-1, Amherst)
* Jim McGovern (MA-3, Worcester)
* Barney Frank (MA-4, Newton) - Chairman, House Financial Services Committee
* John Tierney (MA-6, Salem)
* Ed Markey (MA-7, Malden)
* Mike Capuano (MA-8, Boston)

[edit] Michigan

* Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick (MI-13, Detroit)
* John Conyers (MI-14, Detroit) - Chairman, House Judiciary Committee

[edit] Minnesota

* Keith Ellison (MN-5, Minneapolis)

[edit] Mississippi

* Bennie Thompson (MS-2, Bolton) - Chairman, House Homeland Security Committee

[edit] Missouri

* William Lacy Clay, Jr. (MO-1, St. Louis)
* Emanuel Cleaver (MO-5, Kansas City)

[edit] New Jersey

* Frank Pallone (NJ-06)
* Donald Payne (NJ-10, Newark)

[edit] New Mexico

* Ben R. Luján (NM-3, Santa Fe)

[edit] New York

* Jerry Nadler (NY-8, Manhattan)
* Yvette Clarke (NY-11, Brooklyn)
* Nydia Velazquez (NY-12, Brooklyn) - Chairwoman, House Small Business Committee
* Carolyn Maloney (NY-14, Manhattan)
* Charles Rangel (NY-15, Harlem) - Chairman, House Ways and Means Committee
* Jose Serrano (NY-16, Bronx)
* John Hall (NY-19, Dover Plains)
* Maurice Hinchey (NY-22, Saugerties)
* Louise Slaughter (NY-28, Rochester) - Chairwoman, House Rules Committee
* Eric Massa (NY-29, Corning)

[edit] North Carolina

* Mel Watt (NC-12, Charlotte)

[edit] Ohio

* Marcy Kaptur (OH-9, Toledo)
* Dennis Kucinich (OH-10, Cleveland)
* Marcia Fudge (OH-11, Warrensville Heights)

[edit] Oregon

* Earl Blumenauer (OR-3, Portland)
* Peter DeFazio (OR-4, Eugene)

[edit] Pennsylvania

* Bob Brady (PA-1, Philadelphia) - Chairman, House Administration Committee
* Chaka Fattah (PA-2, Philadelphia)

[edit] Tennessee

* Steve Cohen (TN-9, Memphis)

[edit] Texas

* Sheila Jackson-Lee (TX-18, Houston)
* Eddie Bernice Johnson (TX-30, Dallas)

[edit] Virginia

* Jim Moran (VA-8, Alexandria)

[edit] Vermont

* Peter Welch (VT-At Large)

[edit] Washington

* Jim McDermott (WA-7, Seattle)

[edit] Wisconsin

* Tammy Baldwin (WI-2, Madison)
* Gwen Moore (WI-4, Milwaukee)

[edit] Non-voting

* Donna M. Christensen (Virgin Islands)
* Eleanor Holmes Norton (District of Columbia)

[edit] Senate member

* Bernie Sanders (Vermont)

[edit] Former members

* Sherrod Brown (OH-13) - Elected to Senate
* Julia Carson (IN-07) - Died in December 2007
* Lane Evans (IL-17) - Retired from Congress
* Cynthia McKinney (GA-4) - Lost Congressional seat to current caucus member Hank Johnson
* Major Owens (NY-11) - Retired from Congress
* Nancy Pelosi (CA-8) - Left Caucus when Elected House Minority Leader
* Hilda Solis (CA-32) - Became Secretary of Labor in 2009
* Stephanie Tubbs Jones (OH-11) - Died in 2008
* Tom Udall (NM Senate)
* Paul Wellstone (MN Senate) - Died in plane crash in 2002

The Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) was established in 1991 by five members of the United States House of Representatives: Representatives Ron Dellums (D-CA), Lane Evans (D-IL), Peter DeFazio (D-OR), Maxine Waters (D-CA), and Bernie Sanders (I-VT). Then-Representative Bernie Sanders was the convener and first. The founding members were concerned about the economic hardship imposed by the deepening recession, the growing inequality brought about by the timidity of the Democratic Party response at the time.

Additional House representatives joined soon, including Major Owens (D-NY), Nydia Velazquez (D-NY), David Bonior (D-MI), Bob Filner (D-CA), Barney Frank (D-MA), Maurice Hinchey (D-NY), Jim McDermott (D-WA), Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), Patsy Mink (D-HI), George Miller (D-CA), Pete Stark (D-CA), John Olver (D-MA), Lynn Woolsey (D-CA), and Nancy Pelosi (D-CA).


16 posted on 11/11/2009 4:05:51 PM PST by Rome2000 (OBAMA IS A COMMUNIST CRYPTO-MUSLIM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
I hate saying this, but if a company can get away with hiring people without providing paid sick leave, then that says that it does not think the services of those employees are that valuable.

A lot of companies who hire such people will respond by simply firing anyone who gets sick.

17 posted on 11/11/2009 4:05:51 PM PST by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bcsco

Most of the companies without paid sick leave are those who hire the least skilled and the most likely to abuse sick leave. They’re the last ones that need their employment opportunities cut back—and that’s certain to be the result of such government meddling.


18 posted on 11/11/2009 4:07:59 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

...more like Europe all the time.......


19 posted on 11/11/2009 4:08:21 PM PST by Erik Latranyi (Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pnh102

Very true! I’ve worked for employers like that.

That being said, it should be up to the individual employer to decide.


20 posted on 11/11/2009 4:10:04 PM PST by BenKenobi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson