Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House backs anti-abortion amendment
Reuters ^ | 11/08/2009 | Donna Smith

Posted on 11/07/2009 9:58:22 PM PST by GoldStandard

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The House of Representatives voted on Saturday to tighten a ban against using federal funds to finance abortions under the proposed Democratic healthcare reform legislation.

Opposition Republicans joined forces with anti-abortion Democrats to pass the amendment to the healthcare legislation on a vote of 240-194.

The House approved a sweeping healthcare overhaul on Saturday on a narrow 220-215 vote. The battle over President Barack Obama's top domestic priority now moves to the Senate.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: abortion; healthcare; obama; pelosi

1 posted on 11/07/2009 9:58:23 PM PST by GoldStandard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GoldStandard

If the Reps had abstained, it would have added pressure on the Yellow Dogs.


2 posted on 11/07/2009 10:01:38 PM PST by JimWayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoldStandard

Sweeping destruction of our Republic.


3 posted on 11/07/2009 10:02:18 PM PST by ChiMark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoldStandard

If the Blue Dogs had any gonads, they would change parties in the morning. They knew full well there were enough votes to pass before they ever voted NO. Damn them all.


4 posted on 11/07/2009 10:06:39 PM PST by Bulldawg Fan (Victory is the last thing Murtha and his fellow Defeatists want.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoldStandard

Don’t worry: we have an “empathic judge” standing by to throw this out. :)


5 posted on 11/07/2009 10:11:57 PM PST by Tzimisce (No thanks. We have enough government already. - The Tick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bulldawg Fan

If that actually happened, an en masse switch to GOP or independent, I would laugh until I vomited up my lungs or something.


6 posted on 11/07/2009 10:13:03 PM PST by LifeComesFirst (Until the unborn are free, nobody is free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GoldStandard

The headline is so misleading. What passed is a ban on using federal funds to subsidise or pay for abortion as part of the new government health care.

Not an anti-abortion measure. Although, that would be a better development.


7 posted on 11/07/2009 10:18:16 PM PST by indianrightwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoldStandard

DEATH PANELS


8 posted on 11/07/2009 10:21:06 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoldStandard

Whatever...this is a bait and switch and we all (at least the citizens left with any marbles in their heads) know it.

You LURKERS with money.......that will be one delight we will have..........watching you squirm as your testicles are squeezed. The chickens are coming to rooooosssst in your yard too. That will be the only solace in this holy mess YOU have brought upon the nation.


9 posted on 11/07/2009 10:24:25 PM PST by Outlaw Woman (I would rather Die on my feet, than Live on my knees...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson