Posted on 11/06/2009 5:37:27 PM PST by Michel12
Speaking from their home in the West Bank city of Ramallah, Hasan's relatives painted a picture of a man cornered into an act of "lunacy" by the repeated discrimination of his peers and an attempt by the army to force him to serve in Afghanistan.
"They discriminated against him because he was a Muslim," Mohammed Mohammed, one of Hasan's cousins, told the Daily Telegraph. "We're not trying to make excuses for him but what we were told was that he was under a lot of pressure.
"What we imagine is that he could not take this bad treatment and gave vent unfortunately."
Another cousin, Mohammed Hasan, said he was unable to match the relative he knew and loved with the images he was seeing on a television in the dilapidated living room of his West Bank home.
"A relative called me at 2am and told me what had happened," he said. "The moment I turned on CNN, I found the details.
"I was dumbfounded. I could not believe we were talking about the same person. I tried to believe it was someone else's name I was hearing but unfortunately it was indeed the person they were reporting. It was my cousin."
In the house next door, Hasan's brother Anas had locked himself indoors with his wife, refusing to speak to anyone, including his relatives. ...
(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...
He was a VICTIM.
It was everybody else's fault!
stoopid crybaby lunatic jihadists, byte me.
Yep. It is getting to be very old. Others have been called names and they did not kill other innocents.
Well, that settles that...did he swear to that on a stack of Korans?
Can't make it up.
Everybody knows the jihad is the normal, healthy response of an oppressed people.
I think what he did fit the exact definition of terrorism. He was political and religious and was making a statement against the war. Because Obama is President will the left now try to redefine it?
ya, ya, ya, someone forced him to murder his fellow soldiers. Nidal Hasan is a COWARD. Why didn’t he move to Palestinian territories with his family since he was “so tortured” here?
Sorry dummy. That may be true in your mooslim countries but in MY country, ANYONE who goes into a building full of unarmed people and starts murdering innocent people IS A TERRORIST.
Who is the lawyer he hired 6 months ago?????
Oh, eff all their excuses.
marked
No, he was not precisely a terrorist. He was a soldier, indeed, an operational unit, in the current Islamic War.
When I graduated with a degree in engineering, we had several Muslims come up to get their diploma, and all of them had "Mohamad" as one of their names.
As in:
Kalid Mohammad Azmir
Mohammad Mustafa Hammoud
Then, they announced:
Mohammad Mohammad Mohammad.....
And the whole auditorium broke into laughter. Things were not so PC back then.
If he were not a Moslem he would never have been blamed for that accident in Fort Hood!
gimme a freaking break. they shoulda booted his ass from the military before he joined. he was in the service because he was freakin cair quota.
If it walks like duck, and quacks like a duck, it’s a duck!
Maybe that coward, wussy bastard should have just killed himself instead of taking out a bunch of brave young men and women who put their lives on the line to save this WORLD from terrorists!!!
Thats the difference between that third world shit hole area and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!
BTW, this is a common trait of Democrats as well.
islam is terrorism, and its adherents need to be watched and harassed by local citizenry the same way they would harass and watch a cult of insane mass murdering child molesters, which is in fact what the islamists are.
Send them back, don't let any more in, and take the oil we found and get out of the ground and put the ragheads back to doing what they do best, which is camel riding, harassing women, and buggering young boys.
They obviously have no idea what to do with their oil money other than use it to attack the West, no reason to continue to enrich them.
The party or candidate that runs on this philosophy will win in a landslide.
No one is a terrorist until they commit an act of terrorism.
They lie like it’s nothing to infidels (us), their religion permits it. Taqiyya(sp), I think?
Hey cuz....shut up.
Your giving whining a bad name.
Yes he was. He was not a victim; he was not a ‘good American’; and he most certainly wasn’t a victim of “Pre [(Post)] Tramastic Stress Disorder!
Well, he's a terrorist now, Cousin.
If he wasn’t a terrorist, then he was a monster, Islamic, murder and a hyena in human form. Is that a better description?
The reason thirteen people were killed and thirty people were wounded at Fort Hood by a Muslim fanatic is FOOM... yes foom - Fear of Offending Muslims... FOOM is an extreme form of PC ...
Who is guilty of practicing FOOM in this horrible incident? Those guilty include the command structure at Fort Hood, a large number of officers in the Pentagon, most of the U.S. Congress, the Lame Stream Media and anyone else who succumbs to PC and FOOM... and subsequently becomes a big fat weenie.
Islam is EVIL - plain and simple... PC related FOOM KILLS Americans. FIGHT PC - FIGHT FOOM.
Hey relatives...you suck...your religion sucks and your relative is a murderous jihadist. crawl back into your 13th century loser existence. it is so tiresome hearing your pitiful excuses for your uncivilized behaviors and attitudes. please blow yourselves up at home. thanks.
The statutory definition of domestic terrorism in the United States has changed many times over the years; also, it can be argued that acts of domestic terrorism have been occurring since long before any legal definition was set forth.
According to a memo produced by the FBI's Terrorist Research and Analytical Center in 1994, domestic terrorism was defined as "the unlawful use of force or violence, committed by a group(s) of two or more individuals, against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives."
Under current United States law, set forth in the USA PATRIOT Act, acts of domestic terrorism are those which:
"(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;
(B) appear to be intended— (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and
(C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.