Posted on 11/03/2009 8:45:34 AM PST by StarCMC
This video, linked here, contains multiple images of terrorists committing extremely violent acts. The title of this piece of trash is "Mujahids In Iraq Smashing The American Soldiers." The poster of this video, strive4shuhadaah has described this video as follows:
ALLAAHU AKBAR.. May ALLAAH give the brothers the strength and ability to keep there fight up against the evil treacherous occupation forces..(Also few scenes of the Brothers killing the betraying Iraaq army/police)
AAMEEN
The video starts with multiple terrorist symbols including the Al-Qaeda flag an As-Sahab.
At 1:00 there is an explosion.
1:05 - explosion, repeated at 1:07
1:11 - VBIED explodes next to coalition vehicle
1:14 - explosion
1:16 - blindfolded man on his knees is grabbed by the hair and an knife is pulled, shows the start of a beheading
1:23 - exploding vehicle
1:25 - point blank assassination of three blindfolded people - shown from 2 angles in case we don't see properly from the first
1:38 - IED
1:42 - IED
1:56 - explosions
2:03 - IED shown multiple times
2:14 - IED
2:17 - IED
2:21 - IED
2:25 - Dead body of coalition soldier
2:26 - point blank assassinations of approximately 8 people
2:44 - IED
3:12 - IED
3:14 - IED
3:24 - Bloody dead body
3:28 - Bloody dead body under a car
3:30 - IED
3:33 - IED
3:37 - point blank assassination
3:41 - IED
3:47 - IED
While it might not seem fair to say you can’t show something because of what viewers theoretically might do in response, we draw the line at content that’s intended to incite violence or encourage dangerous, illegal activities that have an inherent risk of serious physical harm or death. This means not posting videos on things like instructional bomb making, ninja assassin training, sniper attacks, videos that train terrorists, or tips on illegal street racing. Any depictions like these should be educational or documentary and shouldn’t be designed to help or encourage others to imitate them.
Over here! UGH!
Meanwhile a Michael Savage video account was banned last week, a guy who posted under the name c-span junkie was banned off the site, he posted news videos including c-span videos, and last year they banned media one a anti obama guy off youtube. Plus others who have good accounts get banned daily.
It’s time to nuke them from orbit
It’s childish, but everywhere they post this stuff, I curse their god and their prophet so it shows up on the same page.
Yeah — that can get their panties in a twist, which is always fun to watch. LOL
This video has been removed due to terms of use violation.
They must be watching FR — we’ve flagged that several times and no movement and then when I post it here — POOF! It’s gone. That happened on Sunday too.
And who owns You Tube?
Google buys YouTube for $1.65 billion(06)
The head of Google was one of Obama’s biggest fundraisers.
Your description of that video seems more appropriate for YouPorn!
Videos have been pulled.
Yep. Google, the big internet gorilla, owns Youtube.
Yes — I think they are watching FR. It had been flagged multiple times and no movement from YT, and then when I posted about it here - BAM! It’s gone.
At the moment, legally speaking, Google and other Web hosts aren’t required to censor what their users post. That’s because of a piece of federal law known as Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Under that law, Web hosts are free to restrict access to content that it deems “objectionable”—if they choose—but in general they can’t be sued for choosing not to do so.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9947500-7.html
on the plus side—
there’s actually evidence that U.S. spy agencies like being able to monitor what their adversaries are doing online. In addition, scholars routinely evaluate al-Qaida videos as part of their research
In general terms, the Order provides a means by which to disrupt the financial support network for terrorists and terrorist organizations by authorizing the U.S. government to designate and block the assets of foreign individuals and entities that commit, or pose a significant risk of committing, acts of terrorism. In addition, because of the pervasiveness and expansiveness of the financial foundations of foreign terrorists, the Order authorizes the U.S. government to block the assets of individuals and entities that provide support, services, or assistance to, or otherwise associate with, terrorists and terrorist organizations designated under the Order, as well as their subsidiaries, front organizations, agents, and associates.
No real way to get around that. And yes, we know about the scholars and those seeking intel from videos posted on YouTube. We've actually helped point them in the right direction a couple of times. :-)
I think I may have mentioned this to you before, Sen Lieberman may be interested in You Tube’s slacking off. He lit a fire under them in 2008 over terror vids.
Thanks for the work you do. I flag them per your posts.
You’re right — we’ve been trying to make sure he sees what’s happening, but he also has to be pretty pre-occupied with the other stuff happening in DC right now too.
“(Everyone knows there’s a difference between muslims & terrorists... no one knows what it is, though.)”
jihadwatchRS Afghanistan: “Rogue policemen” murder five British soldiers: The problem here is a fact that we have pointed out many, many times at JihadWatch.. there is no reliable way to distinguish jihadists from peaceful Muslims http://tinyurl.com/yjx7xst
Excellent! Thanks, Lady Raven.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.