Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Property Values Set to Fall 43% From Current Depressed Levels
Seeking Alpha ^ | 11-02-2009 | Michael David White

Posted on 11/03/2009 6:58:08 AM PST by blam

Property Values Set to Fall 43% From Current Depressed Levels

Michael David White
November 02, 2009

Price Trends / WAR OF THE WORLDS: If you use a 20-year time horizon, and assume prices will return to the trend line, then our residential property bubble will bottom after values fall over 40% from current levels (see above (c) aka “(y) - (z)” aka “Loss Today to Bottom”). I make no predictions. I do watch numbers. The chart shows a catastrophe of falling real estate values loaded up on top of our current catastrophe in real estate values.

No one would question these numbers absent The War of the Worlds. The War of the Worlds is the United States Government versus aggregate borrower income. Uncle Sam is funding every new mortgage – high, low and in between (see chart below--the blue and red represent government-backed loans and the private market is the yellow and green).
It takes very little imagination to see the world of real estate prices vaporizing without government support. If that support was lost, values would crash down faster than a big rock dropped into a shallow puddle.

[snip]


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bho44; economy; housing; obama; property; recession; thecomingdepression
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-108 next last

1 posted on 11/03/2009 6:58:08 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

If this happens we will see the nation divided into people of honor who keep making payments based on loan values far about actual value, versus those who walk away.

Anyone care toredict the ration of walkaways? I would guess 60% of all homeowners or more


2 posted on 11/03/2009 7:00:20 AM PST by silverleaf (Ours is the only country on earth with a ventriloquist dummy for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Related

http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-house-prices-and-median-household-income-2009-11


3 posted on 11/03/2009 7:01:22 AM PST by FromLori (FromLori)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I don’t believe this at all - the market is currently at or very near bottom, look for an upswing in the next 6 months.


4 posted on 11/03/2009 7:05:28 AM PST by domenad (In all things, in all ways, at all times, let honor guide me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
At some point (and I would postulate the 50% mark), the realization will kick in that paying your mortgage is an IQ test -- stupid (though honorable) people pay their mortgage. Smart people walk away. And that 50% figure starts skyrocketing, because nobody wants to be dumb.

At that point it really all falls apart, and we have to enter a communist society, where ownership is a stupid, outmoded concept, and we all just use stuff without caring how it got there.

A bloody time. A time without rules or laws.

5 posted on 11/03/2009 7:06:31 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (Play the Race Card -- lose the game.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

Well, don’t forget about that third group who stays and pays with their free government monopoly money.


6 posted on 11/03/2009 7:06:52 AM PST by AD from SpringBay (We deserve the government we allow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

Just because you walk away doesn’t mean you are no longer liable for the home.

If the bank won’t buy it back, you may not be paying a payment, but you will still owe for the taxes and liability on that home. That’s where we are in MI. The banks won’t take them back. So you have this millstone, losing value but at least if you keep up your payments, you remain current on taxes and you don’t take the chance of someone gets hurt in your abandoned property (stealing your copper pipes most times).


7 posted on 11/03/2009 7:08:09 AM PST by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam

and how would this happen as we see that smart investor buy up depressed real estate as good investments.

More crap from the sky is falling crowd.


8 posted on 11/03/2009 7:08:24 AM PST by HD1200
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
What happens if property values fall AND the value of the dollar falls as well?..
Is that a double crash?.. The bippity bobbity waiting for the BOOM..?

Marxist or Lenist socialism is such a downer.. woo wee...

9 posted on 11/03/2009 7:08:29 AM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam; rabscuttle385; ANGGAPO; STARWISE; sickoflibs; org.whodat; djsherin; bamahead; Daisyjane69; ...

Great housing price chart. Looks like we now have 2004 levels in late 2009.

So did CRA cause this steep growth?? The myth is that this growth could go forever and that the CRA crashed this great Bush party we had.


10 posted on 11/03/2009 7:08:48 AM PST by sickoflibs ( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the government spending you demand stupid")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: domenad

I’m with you....one can now buy most homes for less than land construction cost unless in very hot immune area.

seems flat....not poised for a 40% drop..if so, starter home neighborhoods will be all tumbleweeds


11 posted on 11/03/2009 7:09:29 AM PST by wardaddy (folks, these freepathons are taking too long tightwads, shame on us in front of the kooks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: null and void

rich dad ping


12 posted on 11/03/2009 7:11:03 AM PST by Shimmer1 (Froggie sez water nice and warm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
Since the old number was that the average life of a mortgage was seven years. Deep Do do can not be avoided.
13 posted on 11/03/2009 7:12:38 AM PST by org.whodat (Vote: Chuck De Vore in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Even worse, we will live in a society that believes being honorable is stupid. I guess though, if you only consider this lifetime and what you can get out of it, that might be so, its a very Nietschean point of view.

However, Eternity is a long time to regret being “smart.”


14 posted on 11/03/2009 7:12:43 AM PST by HerrBlucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Shimmer1

When the news seems it can’t get any worse, a stock broker once told me, you know you’re at the bottom. We may stay here for the next 3 years, but I think we are pretty much at the bottom of this thing.


15 posted on 11/03/2009 7:14:01 AM PST by DonaldC (A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: blam

No matter which way real estate goes, you can bet that Carlton Sheets will show you a way to make millions!


16 posted on 11/03/2009 7:15:56 AM PST by Night Hides Not (If Dick Cheney = Darth Vader, then Joe Biden = Dark Helmet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: domenad
Wrong, the law of supply and demand will win in the long run, aways has and always will. We still have around fourteen million homes setting empty and more built everyday and more foreclosed on each day. And the commercial real estate is a mess, with more and more open open space added daily.
17 posted on 11/03/2009 7:16:14 AM PST by org.whodat (Vote: Chuck De Vore in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam

IMHO:

Depending on the area, go back to late 2003, compare sold prices in a given area.

Ignore the highest and lowest price, get the average price of the rest.

Again, depending on the area, add 4%-6% appreciation to that average price for each of the following years up until 12/09.

Assuming the property and it’s neighbors have been well maintained, you will have the fair market value of your home.


18 posted on 11/03/2009 7:17:32 AM PST by TET1968 (SI MINOR PLUS EST ERGO NIHIL SUNT OMNIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
If you use a 20-year time horizon, and assume prices will return to the trend line, then our residential property bubble will bottom after values fall over 40%

You never "bottom" on a trend line - you crash right through it (or it would not be a trend line in the first place)...

19 posted on 11/03/2009 7:17:37 AM PST by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
I got engaged last month, and my fiance and I made a cash offer for a home this week. They guy turned us down when we offered a non-contingent cash offer of 83% of his asking price.
20 posted on 11/03/2009 7:19:34 AM PST by DCBryan1 (The first Civil War freed slaves from individuals. CW2 will free slaves from the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: HD1200
and how would this happen as we see that smart investor buy up depressed real estate as good investments

You are right. Why? Because real estate has intrinsic value, and there will never be a lack of demand (short of a nuclear holocaust or medieval-style plague, but no need to even invoke that). That intrinsic value and perpetual demand are why real estate is called "REAL".

21 posted on 11/03/2009 7:20:39 AM PST by Migraine (Diversity is great... ...until it happens to YOU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Migraine

Chip board palaces are real alright, a real rip off.


22 posted on 11/03/2009 7:30:07 AM PST by junta (S.C.U.M. = State Controlled Unreliable Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: domenad

“I don’t believe this at all - the market is currently at or very near bottom, look for an upswing in the next 6 months.”

I hope you are right but a key factor in your prediction is the issue of money from jobs that produce income. Today, companies big and small are not hiring. In addition, lending rules are such that banks aren’t lending readily. An upturn in RE requires buyers with income to obtain loans.

I just don’t see an increase in employment (including increased salaries for those already employed) any time soon. Hope I’m wrong.


23 posted on 11/03/2009 7:31:09 AM PST by Happyinmygarden (Yes, actually, I have pretty much seen and heard it all before...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FromLori; blam
Excellent posts.....again. I don't think the housing market has hit the bottom, especially on the Space Coast. It is nice to have a frame of reference and these two graphs give that. Our government keeps propping up the market, but as one FReeper said, the housing market is too big to prop up. Sooner or later.....
24 posted on 11/03/2009 7:34:32 AM PST by LuvFreeRepublic (Support our military or leave. I will help you pack BO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: domenad

In our area, I wouldn’t be surprised if prices fell again, because we have seen an upswing in prices in the past 4 months (from looking at prices, seems our bottom hit in June.) So another correction downward wouldn’t be unexpected (we’re in Florida.)


25 posted on 11/03/2009 7:35:48 AM PST by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

So what happens to people like us; almost retired, house almost payed off (will be with some inheritance money coming in next year)?


26 posted on 11/03/2009 7:38:36 AM PST by vanilla swirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dawn53

Depending where you are in Florida, I might agree with you, there are some wildly varying markets there. Sarasota has been relatively stable while Miami tanked like mad.


27 posted on 11/03/2009 7:43:26 AM PST by domenad (In all things, in all ways, at all times, let honor guide me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

Congratulations on your engagement!

Give the seller two weeks. He may then realize the fish that got away.

Then offer 85% cash as your final offer, good for three days.

If he doesn’t take it, walk away. No sense dealing with a fool.


28 posted on 11/03/2009 7:44:43 AM PST by exit82 (Sarah Palin is President No. 45. Get behind her, GOP, or get out of the way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: blam

two important factors in house value are unemployment and interest rates.

Nobody pays the selling price... they make the payments.

Falling interest rates cause prices to rise and conversely, rising interest rates cause prices to stagnate or drop.

$200,000 @ 5% = $100,000 at 10%

Current prices have dropped because tightening of credit (which equals an interest rate of infinity for people turned down for a loan) and rising unemployment.

looking forward:

Interest rates can’t go any lower, so for prices to rise, unemployment must fall.

if interest rates rise, prices will fall
if unemploymnet rises, prices will fall
if unemployment and interest rates stay stable for an extended period (12 months or more) prices will fall under the weight of the forclosure backlog (which will cause further tightening of credit).


29 posted on 11/03/2009 7:46:14 AM PST by lack-of-trust
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
For the optimists who insist we are near the bottom - from the comments at the source article:

"Because local and state governments are losing so much money in tax receipts, you can not make money in Real Estate anymore, because municipalities are going to increase property taxes significantly over the next decade and force older residents to sell their homes and move to lower property tax cities.

I remember this happened in 1987 to my father, who bought his house in Westchester County, New York in 1972 for $60,000. The property taxes then were $1000 a year and in 1987 he was forced to sell the house because his taxes shot up to $15,000 and being retired he felt that they were out of control.

In 2007 I went and visited the current owner of the house and the taxes then had shot up to $35,000. When my father bought his house he paid 1.6% property taxes on it each year and when he sold it he was paying 3.75%. The current owner paid $800,000 for the house and pays 4.375% in house related taxes. But his problem currently is that the house is no longer worth $800,000, but is now worth about $550,000, so his real tax rate is now 6.36%.

The municipality where the house is located is strapped for cash and can not afford to lower taxes, so how is this guy who bought this house for $800,000 ever going to get his money back. Who in their right mind would buy a house with a real property tax rate of 6.36% on it? There is your real problem with Real Estate and the reason why nobody is buying houses even with 4.99% 30 year fixed mortgage rates."

30 posted on 11/03/2009 7:48:09 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves ("If you cannot pick it up and run with it, you don't really own it." -- Robert Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
There is one mistake with this graph. It doesn't take into account the dramatic square footage increases that started occurring in the 90's. That is part of the reason for the rapid rise. It's not all bubble. Comparing the average size 60's and 70's house to the average size 90's and later house is not a fully adequate comparison for this trend line.

Here is some information from a good article in 2007:

Recent sizes of 2,459 avg square-feet are up from the 1973 avg of 1,500 square feet.

Getting steadily higher over the course of the past 10 years, ceilings on the first floor of the average home are expected to be mostly 9 feet and some may even be 10. For luxury homes, a 10-foot ceiling will be standard on the entry level, ranging up to 12, and a 9-foot ceiling will be standard on the second floor. (Compared to 7.5' to 8' in 70's)

For kitchens it’s more counter space, more cabinet space, high end flooring and better quality appliances.

31 posted on 11/03/2009 8:03:26 AM PST by Codeflier (We just had 8 more years of a democrat president in office, we already know what happens!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

wow, what’s the house payment on an $800K mortgage?

We are voting here today on a property tax increase, I hope it goes down. Colorado Springs had no problems with their budget to go around building buildings for the Olympic committee but seem to have problems funding police and fire...go figure. I might have felt more sympathy for them if they said we need the increase for 2 years or something but it was to be indefinite. Governments are corrupt on every level I think.


32 posted on 11/03/2009 8:03:27 AM PST by DonaldC (A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: domenad
I don’t believe this at all - the market is currently at or very near bottom, look for an upswing in the next 6 months.

Well, when you pile logical argument onto logical argument, like you have, and then provide all those additional facts and market data, like you have, the end result is... not all that persuasive.

Regards,

33 posted on 11/03/2009 8:08:14 AM PST by alexander_busek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
The problem lies in the statement and view,accepted by most, that the local government is strapped for cash and CANNOT afford to lower tax rates.

The answer is that the local government should cease every service not constitutionally mandated,and provide those services at the minimum level allowed by law,which means cutting the government payroll drastically..

Most of what government does now was never intended by the founders,and most of the services ought to be provided by private businesses and church groups.

34 posted on 11/03/2009 8:11:18 AM PST by hoosierham (Waddaya mean Freedom isn't free ?;will you take a credit card?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Codeflier
You have provided some good food for thought relative to the size and amenities of the houses now vs the '60s and '70s, but are attitudes changing? Yes the granite counter tops and a min of 3 baths would be nice, but are we going to be forced to starting thinking in terms of what we need vs what we want??? My thinking is changing, especially if you consider what is most likely going to happen to energy prices.
35 posted on 11/03/2009 8:17:13 AM PST by LuvFreeRepublic (Support our military or leave. I will help you pack BO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: junta
Chip board palaces are real alright, a real rip off.

In another 50 years, I imagine there will be quite a few one hundred year old houses ... but not many fifty year old housesw.

36 posted on 11/03/2009 8:27:22 AM PST by TheRightGuy (I want MY BAILOUT ... a billion or two should do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: vanilla swirl

Although I am a Dave Ramsey fan, I would read Harry Dent’s book “The Great Depression Ahead” and follow his advice for the next 2 years or so (which is what I did this summer and plan to do). Sold out of stocks when the market hit 9900 and went to cash. I sleep better now than when I was worryin about rebuilding the value of our retirement accounts by depending on the DOW. No buy and hold for us. Not for the foreseeable future, anyway.

Indicators in the next 6 months or so should show if Dent is accurate in his predictions. Nothing he recommends is injurious, even if he is wrong...imho.

And two words to get through the times ahead: self sufficiency. In every sense. Including defense of self and property and a plan if you need to go elsewhere.


37 posted on 11/03/2009 8:28:11 AM PST by silverleaf (Ours is the only country on earth with a ventriloquist dummy for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: LuvFreeRepublic

Actually, you are quite correct. The same article also mentioned downsizing trends for energy and upkeep reasons. Predicts houses will be much smaller in 2015 on average.


38 posted on 11/03/2009 8:37:30 AM PST by Codeflier (We just had 8 more years of a democrat president in office, we already know what happens!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

What most people fail to realize is that after 20+ years of expansion of credit the debt has to be paid back which means years and years of contracted credit availability. In inflation-adjusted terms housing prices will probably fall to historic low levels over the next 10 years.


39 posted on 11/03/2009 8:40:36 AM PST by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Migraine
"You are right. Why? Because real estate has intrinsic value, and there will never be a lack of demand (short of a nuclear holocaust or medieval-style plague, but no need to even invoke that). That intrinsic value and perpetual demand are why real estate is called "REAL"."

A little over-simplified, IMHO. The only component of real estate that will appreciate over time is the land itself. Any structures or improvements on said land depreciate over time, and will require additional input to maintain their value. As a pure (buy-and-hold) investment then, real estate is only profitable so long as the intrinsic value of the land increases at a faster rate than the depriciation of the improvements. If one is buying said property on a mortgage, the cost of servicing the loan must also be taken into account, if the APR of the loan exceeds inflation. That's all before property taxes, HOA fees, utility fees, et c.,.

The 'intrinsic' value of the land is also mutable. For residential properties, it tends to track closely with the rise or fall of personal incomes in a given area. As it cannot be taken up and moved to a better location, real estate is prisoner to the local economy. Anyone believe that a plot in say, Detroit, has the same 'intrinsic' value it did 5-10 years ago? For that matter, personal incomes are currently depressed in the US, and have been for the better part of a decade.

Over the past 100 years or so, residential real estate 'values' (the correct word is "prices", BTW) have tracked nearly lock-step with overall inflation. Residential real-estate was only a profitable investment for developers who bought unimproved land and profited on the improvements. It was also a smart move for buyers who would otherwise be literally be throwing money away by renting. Some people did make money in the rental market, but only because they had renters paying their mortgages and were planning to realize equity at some point. Changes in tax laws and banking regulations temporarily skewed the numbers (and may have crashed our economy in the process) by artificially increasing demand. It was a short-term monetary solution to offset the long-term economic trend of stagnant/declining personal incomes in the US. In the end, the market will correct itself.

If real estate does hold at current pricing, it will only be because of massive across-the-board inflation has taken hold. I.E.: your house may still have a market value of $200,000, but the cost of everything else will go up by 40%. In the end, it won't matter if prices fall to meet the trend line, or if inflation drives the trend-line up. Gains, if any, will be illusory. Stocks and precious metals are still a better investment over the long haul, and that's where the smart money is going.
40 posted on 11/03/2009 8:40:48 AM PST by CowboyJay (RiNO - It's 'what's for dinner'...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

oh, yeah, like “they” are going to come after 40% or more of the home owning public...

the concept of walking away from everything
rendered worthless and then still taxed by the government... is in the back of my John Galt mind, if it means survival... maybe to fight another day, maybe not


41 posted on 11/03/2009 8:44:00 AM PST by silverleaf (Ours is the only country on earth with a ventriloquist dummy for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek
Hey, my job title is engineer, not real estate salesman/broker. When I recommend a $100k piece of switchgear, I know what I'm talking about and you should consider it. When I recommend you buy a house for a buck, you should get a second opinion from a professional. Then throw out my opinion and make the second your first.

My opinion in this case comes from the sports book/vegas card master school of skepticism. If you KNEW that a horse was a lock, or you KNEW that playing blackjack a certain way would win, you'd be so filthy rich that you wouldn't bother selling a book/dvd about it. If this guy knew his info was right, he'd be primed to make millions, and he damn sure wouldn't share it with me. Scientific? Maybe not, but I've been right more than I've been wrong.

42 posted on 11/03/2009 8:47:39 AM PST by domenad (In all things, in all ways, at all times, let honor guide me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Codeflier
So with the downsizing trends, wouldn’t that put more downward pressure on houses regardless of them being larger and having more amenities than the past. Yes the larger houses and extras are part of the bubble, but time will tell if that makes a difference relative to where the bottom it. Regional issues, I think, will be the biggest factor. Thanks for your reply.
43 posted on 11/03/2009 8:48:40 AM PST by LuvFreeRepublic (Support our military or leave. I will help you pack BO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

He’s going to be real sorry in 6 months.
I made a cash offer on a house at 90% of its asking price one year ago. It was turned down, and they actually raised the price by saying they were going to take some things away from the property (some nice light fixtures and an outbuilding).

The house is still on the market. The asking is now $10,000 less than than price I offered. The realtor keeps calling me and I am struggling to stay polite on the phone.


44 posted on 11/03/2009 8:53:53 AM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: blam

My observation is that prices drop to a third of the high and then fairly quickly recover to two thirds of the high and then slowly work their way up again.

The govt has tried their best to avoid it but I think it will happen this way again.


45 posted on 11/03/2009 8:56:47 AM PST by PeterPrinciple ( Seeking the truth here folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

>>oh, yeah, like “they” are going to come after 40% or more of the home owning public...<<

Well, the government may not “come after” you, but someone looking for a quick payout may.

It happened to a woman in Cleveland. The bank never bought back her home. She still owned it and had no clue that she did. Some idiot fell while stealing the copper pipes. He sued her.

I’m just saying that this is actually happening here in MI as well. The bank doesn’t HAVE to take possession of your home. I guess the lesson is, if you walk away, make sure you walk totally away. Not just from the payments.


46 posted on 11/03/2009 8:57:02 AM PST by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: TET1968

agree with your method, but not the starting point

i would argue that the start should be 1999

reason is that prices just about doubled in So Cal from 1999 to 2003...and that is just not any thing but a bubble

i thought it was going to blow in 2002, but it nearly doubled again from 02 to 06....

then it blew.

it was kept from correcting by the insane lending practices encouraged by the trading in derivatives of packaged or bundled mortgages....


47 posted on 11/03/2009 8:57:21 AM PST by kralcmot (my tagline died with Terri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: kralcmot

“More crap from the sky is falling crowd.”

Makes perfect sense to me. I’ve been arguing this for a long time, that housing prices still have to fall about 50 percent.

Who is going to buy houses? Boomers? Boomer kiddos? Here’s a wakeup call, we can’t afford houses. Price houses back to where they were in the 50s, and then we are talking.


48 posted on 11/03/2009 9:10:15 AM PST by BenKenobi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: BenKenobi

“Price houses back to where they were in the 50s, and then we are talking.”

add “inflation adjusted.” and i agree.


49 posted on 11/03/2009 9:22:05 AM PST by kralcmot (my tagline died with Terri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

Go ask the next one and lower the offer to 60%, however, most all sales of this type require a buy down of the loan by the seller. So a bank/government owned property is best. The person you were dealing with was already upside down that has nothing to do with the current market value.


50 posted on 11/03/2009 9:23:15 AM PST by org.whodat (Vote: Chuck De Vore in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson