Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

States Are Pondering Fraud Suits Against Banks
New York Times ^ | November 2, 2009 | David Streitfeld, John Collins Rudolf

Posted on 11/02/2009 7:25:05 PM PST by Lorianne

PHOENIX — Newly empowered by the Supreme Court, the attorneys general of several states hit hard by the housing collapse are exploring consumer fraud suits against major mortgage lenders.

Frustrated by the banks’ inability or unwillingness to stop an avalanche of foreclosures, the states are considering lawsuits over the creation and marketing of millions of bad loans as well as the dismal pace of mortgage modifications.

Such cases would have been impossible until recently, because federal regulators had exclusive oversight of national banks. But a 5-to-4 Supreme Court decision in June allowed the states to exercise their own supervision, giving them significant leverage.

“We tried to use the tool to be persuasive with the banks,” Arizona’s attorney general, Terry Goddard, said in an interview. “But their waterfall of excuses, the abysmal numbers of modifications, tells us persuasion is not working.”

As a result, he said, “we’re moving much closer to litigation.”

While statutes vary, those of every state prohibit fraud in consumer lending. The attorneys general are considering the theory that the banks essentially perpetrated a vast fraud on consumers by marketing exotic loans that would prove impossible to pay back.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 11/02/2009 7:25:06 PM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

These AG’s should go after Congress first for imposing ridiculous lending rules on banks.


2 posted on 11/02/2009 7:27:35 PM PST by ABQHispConservative (A good Blue Dog is an unelected Blue Dog. Ditto Rino's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Throw in a perp walk of Dodd and Franks right out of the Capitol Building and I’d be down for it. Otherwise, why demonize the lenders for doing what Congress made them do with implied threats of lawsuits if they didn’t?


3 posted on 11/02/2009 7:28:56 PM PST by OrangeHoof ("Barack Obama" is Swahili for "Bend over suckahs".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ABQHispConservative
"These AG’s should go after Congress first for imposing ridiculous lending rules on banks."

They can start with ACORN who falsly filled out mortgage forms for illiterate aliens.

yitbos

4 posted on 11/02/2009 7:29:53 PM PST by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Yes, the banks should simply give the houses away.


5 posted on 11/02/2009 7:34:08 PM PST by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2

And people should be allowed to sign contracts with no due diligence, understanding, or obligation on their own part. To expect responsibility is simply criminal.


6 posted on 11/02/2009 7:40:41 PM PST by AD from SpringBay (We deserve the government we allow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

But they won’t. I guess banks are the new boogy man for the libs. I wonder if this an attempt to nationalize all lending. Wasn’t there a story regarding ACORN and some sort of financial oversight?


7 posted on 11/02/2009 7:41:19 PM PST by ABQHispConservative (A good Blue Dog is an unelected Blue Dog. Ditto Rino's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
While statutes vary, those of every state prohibit fraud in consumer lending. The attorneys general are considering the theory that the banks essentially perpetrated a vast fraud on consumers by marketing exotic loans that would prove impossible to pay back.

That is true, but they need to go after the builders and realtor's as well.

8 posted on 11/02/2009 8:02:10 PM PST by org.whodat (Vote: Chuck De Vore in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
While statutes vary, those of every state prohibit fraud in consumer lending. The attorneys general are considering the theory that the banks essentially perpetrated a vast fraud on consumers by marketing exotic loans that would prove impossible to pay back.

And what of the stimulus and TARP and entitlements...?

Cheers!

9 posted on 11/02/2009 8:13:15 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ABQHispConservative
If you think MORTGAGE ORIGINATORS were making as many loans as fast as they could to any and all comers, because they were forced to. Then you are ready for the straight jacket. They made between, $6500.00 to $9000.00 on each of those loans when bundled and sold.

Here you a fair read, try educating yourself.

http://gaddiskinherd.com/blog/

10 posted on 11/02/2009 8:14:21 PM PST by org.whodat (Vote: Chuck De Vore in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

http://gaddiskinherd.com/blog/


11 posted on 11/02/2009 8:14:50 PM PST by org.whodat (Vote: Chuck De Vore in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

Of course they made money. They were lousy loans. By bundling them and securitizing them they shifted the risk to someone down the financial line. Were I in their place, I would do the same thing. They were gaming the system. It happens all the time. Unless you wanted them to eat the crap loans?

But if they were ‘encouraged’ to lend to individuals that had no means of repaying, then that means that they were forced.


12 posted on 11/02/2009 8:25:16 PM PST by ABQHispConservative (A good Blue Dog is an unelected Blue Dog. Ditto Rino's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ABQHispConservative
Yes, George Bush encourage Fannie and Freddie to make 5.5 million of them, in a deal worked out by Mel Martinez. But I think it was more of leading lambs to the slaughter than it was force.
13 posted on 11/02/2009 8:32:21 PM PST by org.whodat (Vote: Chuck De Vore in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat; ABQHispConservative
"That is true, but they need to go after the builders and realtor's as well."

The appraisers.

yitbos

14 posted on 11/02/2009 9:59:28 PM PST by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wafflehouse; Leisler; PAR35; TigerLikesRooster; AndyJackson; Thane_Banquo; nicksaunt; ...
*Ping!*
15 posted on 11/02/2009 10:44:12 PM PST by rabscuttle385 (http://restoretheconstitution.ning.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
The Appraisers:

True, way to many appraiser have no, none, zero, formal education in appraising. The job should require at least a BS degree with a lot of back ground in economics.

16 posted on 11/03/2009 6:49:59 AM PST by org.whodat (Vote: Chuck De Vore in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson