Poll : 70% Say 'President Hillary' Better Than Obama

News Max ^ | November 02, 2009 | Dave Eberhart

[RobinMasters]

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 27 percent of voters think Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would be doing a better job as president, while 49 percent say she would be performing about the same. That’s about 70 percent that say a hypothetical ‘President Hillary’ would be doing as well or better than President Barack Obama.

Meanwhile, just 14 percent of U.S. voters say Hillary Clinton would be doing a worse job as president than Obama if she had won last year’s Democratic presidential nomination.

[RobinMasters]

Ping.

[freedumb2003]

God help me, so do I.

[lookout88]

Stupid question, stupid answer.

[etradervic]

Just about anyone would be better than 0bama - Jimmy Carter, Lyndon Johnson, Hillary, Biden, anybody.

[Cicero]

How about “Neither of the above”?

[LADY J]

He's a disaster & she would be too. There is so much being uncovered about the slimey things the Clinton White House did.

People like these two should be kept as far away from the White House as possible!!

[Jeff Chandler]

Biden?! Are you out of your mind?

Heck, we might as well exhume Soupy Sales and give him a shot at it.

[Freddd]

I know where that poll was taken.

They voted for her because that was the only 2 options.
And most of the comments were

NEITHER

[Nachum]

At least she was born here.

[bravotu]

Hey !
Soupy Sales ?!?
Black Fang has Serious Issues,

[jveritas]

That is really a very bad representation of the poll results by Neewsmax.

[adorno]

70% Say 'President Hillary' Better Than Obama

Any one of my three cats would be a better president. I'm 100% certain about that. How do I know that? Well, none of my cats would be doing anything to cause the harm that Obama is causing right now.

But, why are people even considering a stupid hypothetical anyway? It's not going to make any difference. If Hillary had been the president, people might be asking the opposite question about whether Obama would've been a better president than Hillary. Heck, why not go all out and ask the same question with McCain as the president vs Obama or Palin as the president vs Obama?

But, none of it matters. Except perhaps to Hillary, who would be become a certain candidate again in 2012 if it turned out that Obama might call it quits because the great majority of the people, including liberals, became too disgusted with him to want him for another term.

[Blood of Tyrants]

I disagree. She has already had her hand smacked when she tried Hillarycare in 1994. Hillary would have been smarter and attempted to move the country only a little more socialist. Obama’s heavy handed tactics on everything he touches got on the people’s nerves very quickly.

[pissant]

She couldn’t possibly be worse than this boy marxist.

[etradervic]

I was waiting for that. Yes even Biden. He may be a bungler’s bungler. But he does not adhere to an agenda to “transform” America based upon a leftist ideology. So, yes, even Biden would be better than 0Bama.

[Pavegunner72]

Clinton better than Hussein?

That’s like saying that cow pie smells better than that other one.

[Recovering_Democrat]

PWN3D!

Better put some ice on that, Barack.

[KarinG1]

I will never regret having taken the only opportunity I will likely ever have to vote against Hillary Clinton. I would have voted for Vladimir Putin had he been running against her, and will do so in the future if the opportunity arises. ABH.

[chris_bdba]

Was that their question “would Hillary be better”? Well yes anything would be better than Obama!

[Mygirlsmom]

Bah! Same sh!t, different day. They both put on their red boxers one leg at a time...

[napscoordinator]

God help me, so do I.

Ditto.

[napscoordinator]

Jimmy Carter

He was and is worse than Obama. I was seven years old and will never forgive him for making me sit in a car waiting on getting gas that my father was getting. He sucked so bad that it makes Obama look great. I guess you forgot about the hostages. The high inflation. etc.

[Markos33]

When you've seen one commie, you've pretty much seen them all.

Hillary, or Obama...it makes no difference.

[r9etb]

That is really a very bad representation of the poll results by Neewsmax.

What else would you expect?

[Candor7]

Hillery better than Obama? Well she would have self righteous tirades and would in the end be less of a nationalist socialist, but she is pretty much cut from the same cloth as Obama, or else she would have battled Obama and his thugs at the Dem Convention in 2008.

Hillery rolled over for Obama.And many of her supporters abandon her because of it.

I prefer to say better the devil you know than the one you do not.Obama is much more disposable than Hillery. That is a very good thing.

[New Yawk Minute]

I agree. I dont think we would be dealing with this healthcare crap if she had one. She wouldnt make the same mistake twice.

[New Yawk Minute]

won not one.

[ThunderSleeps]

That's not really a rousing endorsement of Mrs. Clinton. After all, just about anyone would be better than obama. The list of people who would be as bad or worse than obama is pretty darn short: Osama Bin Laden, Kim Jong Ill, Ahmadinejad, pelosi, or anyone from ABC, CBS, MSNBC, CNN, or code pink.

Seriously though, that's an interesting thought. I'll bet you couldn't find oh, lets be generous and say 1 million US Citizens that would be worse than obama. Out of a pool of some 300 million, that means we've managed to put someone in the bottom 0.3% into office. Good job all you fools that voted for him. Honestly though, I'd bet you'd have a hard time finding a million people that could be doing worse than obama right now.

[paudio]

27 percent of voters think Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would be doing a better job as president, while 49 percent say she would be performing about the same. That’s about 70 percent that say a hypothetical ‘President Hillary’ would be doing as well or better than President Barack Obama.

I'm bad at math. Please someone tell me how they reached the 70% number...

[Defiant]

Not only that, but the logic is a little lacking. If 49 say she’d be about the same, and 27 say she’d be better, then 24 say she’d be worse. The headline could as easily say that 73 percent say that Hillary would be worse.

[EDINVA]

I’d be in the ‘she wouldn’t be any worse’ category.

[B Knotts]

Newsmax math.

[paudio]

I guess for News Max ‘about the same as’ is equal to ‘better than’, which I agree with you, could also mean equal to ‘worse than’.

[MrDem]

YEAH! Maybe the Beast and Slick will now go for the kill on Pantywaist.