Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/01/2009 8:01:36 AM PST by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: george76; proud_yank; grey_whiskers; FrPR; enough_idiocy; Desdemona; rdl6989; Little Bill; ...
 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

2 posted on 11/01/2009 8:04:09 AM PST by steelyourfaith (Limit all U.S. politicians to two terms: One in office and one in prison! to s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76
Dr. Spash also wrote that the economic theory underpinning emissions trading schemes was far removed from the reality

That covers it.

4 posted on 11/01/2009 8:12:48 AM PST by org.whodat (Vote: Chuck De Vore in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

“global warming” isn’t science. It’s politics.


5 posted on 11/01/2009 8:15:17 AM PST by Leftism is Mentally Deranged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

He seems pretty talkative for someone who was “gagged”.


6 posted on 11/01/2009 8:18:24 AM PST by eclecticEel (The Most High rules in the kingdom of men ... and sets over it the basest of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76
Photobucket
7 posted on 11/01/2009 8:19:08 AM PST by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

and Democrats want to characterize Republicans as anti-science.


8 posted on 11/01/2009 8:27:12 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76
The debate actually is over…and the idea that human emissions of carbon dioxide will cause any significant degree of global warming has been categorically refuted and falsified. The empirically-measured change in the amount of energy radiating away from the Earth as a function of changes in sea surface temperature totally falsifies the IPCC climate models--and more importantly, completely falsifies the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis—total, categorical falsification, not simply invalidation of the alleged "proof" based on computer climate models:
10 posted on 11/01/2009 11:06:21 AM PST by sourcery (Those whom the gods would destroy they first make socialist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76
The paper, by Clive Spash, criticises the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme and argues that direct legislation or a tax on carbon is needed...

Dr. Spash also wrote that the economic theory underpinning emissions trading schemes was far removed from the reality ...

He said trading schemes were ineffective ...

I was confused. It took awhile for it to dawn on me. Apparently Clive thinks the purpose of Carbon Reduction legislation is to reduce carbon emissions.

Poor Clive just doesn't get it, does he?

Hey, Clive, how the hell is Al Gore going to make billions off a simple tax that goes straight to the government? How will Democrat contributors on Wall Street get paid back? Even though it would indeed destroy private sector jobs, how does a simple carbon tax compare to an exceedingly complex regulatory scheme, interlinked with government regulated private trading of (Al Gore supplied) carbon credits, in extending government control over industry and individuals.

Wake up and smell the fascism, Clive.

11 posted on 11/01/2009 11:21:48 AM PST by Stultis (Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia; Democrats always opposed waterboarding as torture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson