Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Limiting Growth in 2 Provinces Is the Key to Canada’s Greenhouse Goals, Study Finds
New York Times ^ | October 30, 2009 | Ian Austen

Posted on 11/01/2009 7:38:11 AM PST by reaganaut1

A report by two environmental groups and financed by Toronto-Dominion Bank finds that Canada can meet its greenhouse gas reduction targets only by limiting economic growth in the oil-rich provinces of Alberta and Saskatchewan.

The report, from the Pembina Institute and the David Suzuki Foundation, broadly concludes that Canada can lower greenhouse gas emissions by 25 percent compared with 1990 levels by 2020 while maintaining a “strong, growing economy, a quality of life higher than Canadians enjoy today, and continued steady job creation across the country.”

But the study, which relies on an economic model from M.K. Jaccard and Associates, also says the impact on growth will not be even throughout the country.

“The urgent need to address the enormous G.H.G. emissions from the coal-fired electricity and petroleum sectors in Alberta and Saskatchewan accounts for reductions in the projected rates of growth in these provinces,” the report said.

Under this analysis, Canada’s overall economy will grow at an annual average rate of 2.2 percent between next year and 2020 if greenhouse gas reduction measures are in place.

Without any changes, the report found, the economy would grow an additional 1.5 percent over the period, although by 2020 greenhouse gas emissions will be 47 percent above their 1990 levels.

But the report forecasts that Alberta’s growth will be 8.5 percent less than it would be if emissions continue unchecked. Saskatchewan, which is a much smaller energy producer, could see a 2.8 percent drop.

...

Jim Prentice, the federal environment minister, said in an interview with The Globe and Mail that the report’s conclusions were “irresponsible.”

He added that “the kind of economic consequences you see in this report are not necessary if this is done in an orderly way.”

(Excerpt) Read more at greeninc.blogs.nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Canada; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: alberta; canada; energy; globalwarming; petroleum
I wonder what Alberta and Saskatchewan think about this. A similar study needs to be done for the U.S. -- has it?
1 posted on 11/01/2009 7:38:11 AM PST by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: steelyourfaith; xcamel

global warming ping


2 posted on 11/01/2009 7:38:44 AM PST by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Canaduh needs to get rid of Ontario and Quebec.


3 posted on 11/01/2009 7:39:49 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

LOL, I think the winter weather will slow the economic developemt with out intervention. Nice place to visite and all of that.http://roadinfo.telenium.ca/shwyw.html


4 posted on 11/01/2009 7:43:33 AM PST by org.whodat (Vote: Chuck De Vore in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Yeah...right....the elitists who live off the energy and food produced in Alberta and Saskatchewan better watch out....I don’t think those 2 provinces will take kindly to being told they cannot grow...heck, they are the two provinces keeping Canada alive!


5 posted on 11/01/2009 7:43:40 AM PST by goodnesswins (Tagline, oh tagline, whereart thou?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
How about they try it in Quebec 1st. If it works for Leftists them, maybe the rest of Canada will try it.
6 posted on 11/01/2009 7:46:53 AM PST by MNJohnnie (Note to the GOP: Do not count your votes until they are cast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
title should just read “Limiting Growth Is the Key to Goals” 'Cuase that is all it is about for these destructionists.
7 posted on 11/01/2009 7:52:02 AM PST by seastay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Unless Canada awakens to the devestation that environmentalism brings to a nation it will die a withered death.

Unfortunately, in the classrooms throughout the county,( as well as throughout the western world), students are taught the death of their country is for a noble cause. However, the occupiers of the new world will NOT give a damn about he welfare of the world, just their pocket.

8 posted on 11/01/2009 7:52:41 AM PST by Jakarta ex-pat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

as a former canuck, I know firsthand that Albertans have a bigger hatred for Ottawa than Texas has for DC. They know they have the oil, Ottawa-Quebec wants to grab it and they wont let em’. There’s a reason why conservatives and separatists are concentrated in that province.


9 posted on 11/01/2009 7:53:48 AM PST by max americana (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

The liberal provinces fare fine, but the conservative provinces get screwed.


10 posted on 11/01/2009 7:54:26 AM PST by eclecticEel (The Most High rules in the kingdom of men ... and sets over it the basest of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1; proud_yank; grey_whiskers; FrPR; enough_idiocy; Desdemona; rdl6989; Little Bill; ...
Thanx !

 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

11 posted on 11/01/2009 8:02:25 AM PST by steelyourfaith (Limit all U.S. politicians to two terms: One in office and one in prison! to s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

They want to end prosperity and they are getting more and more blatant about it.


12 posted on 11/01/2009 8:09:14 AM PST by GeronL (http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com .... I am a rogue nobody. One of millions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Its not going to happen in Canada. The federal government does not have that kind of power over any province. But does reveal the totalitarian agenda of the so-called "climate change" advocates all too clearly. They want some people to face a lower qualify of life to meet an abstract utopian objective. In the past, that used to be called Communism. The more things change...

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find only things evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelogus

13 posted on 11/01/2009 8:09:24 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eclecticEel
The liberal provinces fare fine, but the conservative provinces get screwed.

Those who produce the raw materials get the shaft from those who use them. But then, for all their babble about the evils of 'exploitation' of whatever, Liberals are hypocrites.

Keep in mind that a significant portion of our imported oil is coming from Canada, and the joy gets spread a little farther.

14 posted on 11/01/2009 8:29:52 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

See how easy it is to solve so-called global warming? All you have to do is limit “economic growth” in two provinces.

Oh, did we forget to mention that means ending the production of fossil fuels we depend on for our energy. Oopsey...little oversight on our part.


15 posted on 11/01/2009 8:34:35 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
The report, from the Pembina Institute and the David Suzuki Foundation

I wonder if that's the David Suzuki, a Canadian geneticist.
I had one of his textbooks in college; it was actually a pretty
good text.
But my impression more recently is that he climbed the walls
of academia to be something of an eviro-politico.

It does appear to be him: I found the foundation's website
at www.davidsuzuki.org.
16 posted on 11/01/2009 8:48:41 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VOA

Yep, it’s David Suzuki.

Everyone in the West hates Ottawa. Ottawa is scum. BC has considerable offshor oil reserves and we can’t develop em because of the leftists in Ottawa, and the leftists in Victoria. Think it as if TX were saddled with an Austin with 12 million people.


17 posted on 11/01/2009 8:59:13 AM PST by BenKenobi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: VOA
to be something of an eviro-politico.

He's been that way for 30 years. He fills countless hours of the CBC's leftist broadcast schedule.

18 posted on 11/01/2009 11:46:14 AM PST by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1; fanfan; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; ...
Reduce carbon emissions: limit economic growth. Starvation and poverty are simply too good to limit to the Third World!

DOOMAGE!

Global Warming PING!

You have been pinged because of your interest in environmentalism, alarmist wackos, mainstream media doomsday hype, and other issues pertaining to global warming.

Freep-mail me to get on or off: Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on global warming.

An open letter to Steve Levitt

Global Warming on Free Republic

Latest from Global Warming News Site

Latest from Greenie Watch

Latest from Junk Science

Latest from Terra Daily

19 posted on 11/01/2009 5:27:57 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Barack Hussein Obama: the country's greatest firearms salesman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Throw Alberta under the Bus? How about Alberta and Saskatchewan go their own way.


20 posted on 11/01/2009 5:42:28 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Obama: Grasping at Straw Men _ Not a Public Option It's a government mandate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

I saw the title, and I immediately thought “Wait, I’ll bet they’re the ones where all the conservatives live.” Yep.


21 posted on 11/01/2009 10:20:51 PM PST by Still Thinking (If ignorance is bliss, liberals must be ecstatic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
Throw Alberta under the Bus? How about Alberta and Saskatchewan go their own way.

OR.....


22 posted on 11/01/2009 10:26:10 PM PST by Still Thinking (If ignorance is bliss, liberals must be ecstatic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; Clive; exg; kanawa; backhoe; -YYZ-; Squawk 8888; headsonpikes; AntiKev; ...
Thanks for the ping, Tolerance Sucks Rocks.


23 posted on 11/02/2009 4:33:36 AM PST by fanfan (Why did they bury Barry's past?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
reaganaut1 wrote:
"I wonder what Alberta and Saskatchewan think about this."

Time to revive that old bumper sticker:

"LET THE EASTERN BASTARDS FREEZE IN THE DARK"

24 posted on 11/02/2009 8:45:17 AM PST by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

Thanks for the map.
It “speaks volumes” to me having grown up in Oklahoma (in an oil
town), with beloved extended family in Alberta (actually in Sherwood
Park “hamlet”).


25 posted on 11/02/2009 10:12:25 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
Canaduh needs to get rid of Ontario and Quebec.

If they got rid of Alberta and Saskatchewan they could meet their goals. The US should offer to help Canada out.
26 posted on 11/07/2009 11:31:56 AM PST by fallujah-nuker (Deport Destro back to Balkystan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson