Posted on 10/30/2009 6:30:17 AM PDT by rebes22
Do not doubt the direction we are headed and the destination we will reach.
With those words to gay activists at the annual Human Rights Campaign (HRC) fundraiser this month, President Obama again signaled -- with the wink-and-a-nod style with which he is so adept -- his support for same-sex marriage.
Few people believe the president when he insists he opposes gay nuptials. But the more significant issue is not whether the Obama administrations destination on marriage is same-sex marriage. It clearly is. The key issue is whether, based on who the president surrounds himself with, the administration will put us on the slippery slope toward the end of government recognition of marriage altogether.
Consider Chai Feldblum, Obamas commissioner on the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). She is an avowed supporter of polygamy. In 2006, she signed a manifest titled Beyond Marriage, which advocated legal recognition for a wide range of relationships, households and familiesregardless of kinship or conjugal status, including households in which there is more than one conjugal partner.
Then there is Cass Sunstein, whom Obama tapped to be administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. Sunstein proposes to abolish traditional marriage as a state-sponsored institution. In his 2008 book Nudge, he says marriage discriminates against single people, bringing them serious disadvantages. Sunstein writes:
Official marriage licenses also have the unfortunate consequence of dividing the world into the status of those who are married and those who are single in a way that produces serious economic and material disadvantages.
Why not leave peoples relationships to their own choices, subject to the judgments of private organizations, religious or otherwise?
(Excerpt) Read more at humanevents.com ...
They have a friend in the White House now - although I seem to remember Obama the candidate being against gay marriage.
You’re not suggesting that the Candidate and the President might have been perceived to have expressed more than one view on a given topic, are you? Shame! You must be racist!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.