. . . Article and #3. .
Posted on 10/30/2009 6:01:35 AM PDT by kellynla
Was this decision actually written for Carter by his new Law Clerk brought in by him from Obama's defense law firm?
I find the decision disappointing but there is something good to take from it. That is the conclusion that the Plaintiff candidates were harmed. I think the justiciability prong can be turned around since Carter created a false premise to justify his lack of justiciability. We all know he does not have jurisdiction to impeach Obama. What he does have jurisdiction and a duty to do is interpret the Constitution.
The Legislative Branch does not have the jurisdiction or ability to interpret the Constitution.
All Judge Carter should have done is apply Obama’s facts (after conducting a hearing) to the natural born citizen term in the Second Amendment. The district court has exclusive jurisdiction and the duty to interpret the Constitution which he should have done.
Then, the Legislative Branch would be required to take action based on whatever the court’s interpretation was.
On appeal, this distinction must be highlighted.
(Excerpt) Read more at antimullah.com ...
• It’s OK to ignore Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U. S. Constitution.
• Votes trump the U. S. Constitution.
• The U. S. Constitution does not allow the judicial branch to interfere in a coup d’etat.
The fix was in. Velamoor probably brought Judge Carter’s ruling with him from Perkins Coie.
http://theobamafile.com/ObamaLatest.htm
ping
From the ruling :
“Plaintiffs argue that despite the fact that President Obama has produced a birth certificate from the state of Hawaii”
WRONG!
Hussein NEVER produced a birth certificate.
There was a COLB produced which any 9-yr old with access to a computer could have produced.
There was a COLB produced which any 9-yr old with access to a computer could have produced>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Excuse my slight edit:
There was a[short form] COLB produced which any 9-yr old with access to a computer could have produced.
“short”, long, fat, skinny...IT WAS NOT A BIRTH CERTIFICATE.
And the ruling from Judge Carter was W...R...O...N...G!
Hence, an appeal is on the way.
And any of the Obots who “think” this is “THE END” have another “perry mason” wannabee thought coming.
Oops
BTTT
“FREE THE LONG FORM!”
. . . Article and #3. .
Agreed. We need to see an authentic copy of Obamas Long Form COLB.
LOL.
I agree that Carter dodged. Too bad. He could have become historic.LOL.
Darth Velamoor....yep, a name from the Evil Empire.
I think I have already pointed out the basic point made here, that nobody ever asked Judge Carter to impeach Obama, contrary to what his decision claims.
Of course he cannot impeach Obama. But he can consider the evidence, or lack of evidence, presented to his court.
For instance, I fail to see why he could not have said that Obama and the DNC and those responsible for vetting the candidate have failed to demonstrate that he is a Natural Born Citizen under the Constitution. And he could have issued an order that Obama should provide the relevant evidence to resolve the issue.
Obama would, of course, refuse. But that would finally have opened up this can of worms for further appeals up to the Supreme Court.
It does seem to be a remarkable coincide that Obama’s pet law student from DC was shipped all the way out to California to be this judge’s law clerk right at this time. Is that a usual procedure? Does this clerk intend to pursue a law career in California?
Siddharth Velamoor is apparently an Indian Name, given the names of the relatives that came with that a search on the name. It sounds to me more like someone who was a member of Slithering House. Or as you indicated, a sort of junior Sith.
Re-read Judge Carter's decision. He discusses exactly what Orly's Complaint asked him to do, which included an order enjoining Obama from deploying any troops outside the U.S. and an order barring Obama from signing any treaties with foreign countries. No judge can issue any such an order.
For instance, I fail to see why he could not have said that Obama and the DNC and those responsible for vetting the candidate have failed to demonstrate that he is a Natural Born Citizen under the Constitution. And he could have issued an order that Obama should provide the relevant evidence to resolve the issue. Obama would, of course, refuse. But that would finally have opened up this can of worms for further appeals up to the Supreme Court.
A federal court has no ability to order discovery in the abstract. It can order discovery when someone needs the evidence to prove a case, but they must first plead a case that is within the Court's jurisdiction. That means you have to be asking the Court to do something that a court has the power to do.
It does seem to be a remarkable coincide that Obama’s pet law student from DC was shipped all the way out to California to be this judge’s law clerk right at this time.
He was not from D.C., he was from Washington State. And he was not "Obama's pet law student": he was an associate in the products liability department of a very large law firm, whose election law department has represented Obama. There is not a shred of evidence that the clerk ever worked on any of Obama's cases. Besides, if Orly that hiring this clerk was a problem, she had to ask Carter to recuse himself before he ruled on the motion. She didn't.
Is that a usual procedure? Does this clerk intend to pursue a law career in California?
The most prestigious district court clerkships are considered to be those in the Southern District of New York (Manhattan), the Central District of California (LA), the Northern District of Illinois (Chicago) and the District of Columbia. Law students from all over the country fight for those clerkships, because those districts tend to have the biggest and most cutting-edge lawsuits. After a clerkship in any one of those districts, you can go practice almost anywhere. (Judge Carter is in the Central District of California).
Bet he’s not there 3 months from now.
Bet he’s not there 3 months from now.’
He’ll only stay long enough for the Christmas bonus !!
Try out these coincidences:
Law associate attached to prestigous Washington DC law firm decides to go to work for a Federal judge in Santa Ana, California, as a ‘law clerk’, which seems like a downgrade.
Exactly how many Federal judges are there?
How often do they have the need for a new law clerk?
When was this person hired? Exactly..
Same prestigous Washington DC law firm has Bauer on it’s staff or as a partner.
Same law firm is the one that has been paid a hefty amount to keep Nobama’s records from being exposed. Thought to be $1.6 ++ million.
Bauer’s wife is Anita Dunn- who loves Mao- and who works in the White House.
Someone help me with all these ‘coincidences’.
I just cannot swallow it all.
Vince Foster didn’t commit suicide, either!!
People been swallowing everything the GOP hands them for years so these guys certainly expect their turn, too.
I have lost hope that this can be fixed without ***** shed.
Speaking of "Perry Mason wannabees" don't you owe a bunch of Freepers steak dinners?
Only $64.98 at Tony's Market
You can thank me later for finding these for you.
Do you have any proof for that???
It's hard to post evidence of something that never happened, which is why I said "[t]here is not a shred of evidence that the clerk ever worked on any of Obama's cases." But I will point out that the clerk worked in the firm's products liability department, not the political law department, and that his name isn't on any pleadings ever filed by Perkins Coie in any Obama-related case. (At least I assume it's not, because no one has pointed to any such a pleading).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.