Libertarian ping! Click here to get added or here to be removed or post a message here!
View past Libertarian pings here | DONATE to FreeRepublic NOW!
Posted on 10/29/2009 9:31:01 PM PDT by 4rcane
Why can't other Republicans argue like this without being ashamed.. Here is someone who understand capitalism and will defend it as a system thats good for society and the well being of other human beings
Please stop by the FReepathon thread and give it a bump. If you haven’t donated yet, please give it some thought.
Thank you!
Because of all the Freepers that ridicule people for being for ANY aspect of Ron Paul... here’s looking at you, SoCalPol.
LK doesn’t try to hide his bias.
How clueless can you get? His grade school Marxism was embarrassing.
Moore: I believe America is an imperialist war-mongering nation.
Paul: Oh yeah? Well I really believe that America is an imperialist war-mongering nation.
Moore: Oh yeah? Well I really really believe that America is an imperialist war-mongering nation.
Paul: Oh yeah? Well I really really really believe that America is an imperialist war-mongering nation.
Moore: Oh yeah? Well I really really really really believe that America is an imperialist war-mongering nation.
Paul: Oh yeah? Well I really really really really really believe that America is an imperialist war-mongering nation.
Moore: Oh yeah? Well I really really really really really really believe that America is an imperialist war-mongering nation.
I think LK is oblivious to his bias.
Generally speaking I like everything but his foreign policy views. On healthcare I’m sure I’d be on board with something he’d develop, but I doubt that would ever see the light of day.
**Moore: I believe America is an imperialist ...really really really really really really believe that America is an imperialist war-mongering nation.**
OK, we’ll be back of some commercials that hopefully will make sense
He is Rahm Emanuel's brother, and apparently of the same temperment.
big ping for Paul!
Larry King shows off his profound ignorance when he characterized Paul’s distinction between capitalism and corporatism as “semantics”.
But...but...I thought Ron Paul was just a “kook” /sarc.
well, if he believes 9/11 was an insider job, then yes
Is Larry King still dead?
Bump Bump.
He is. He actually believes in following that 200 year old parchment scrap...something called ‘The Constitution’, I believe?! What an outrageous freak!
LMAO, I was about to post “In before SoCalPol.”
The sad thing about it is that half the posters here have no idea about that “scrap” either. We still fight the good fight, bro.
Ping
Whether you’re for or against the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, they’ll be unsustainable after Obama destroys the dollar.
Good post. Because most elected republicans believe in corporatistic-government. They just cat like they dont when democrats are in charge.
Yeah, Ron paul....He’s nuts. NOT
well, if he believes 9/11 was an insider job, then yes
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++=
It’s obvious you haven’t read his books.
On SOME, key word some, of his foreign policy views I may not agree. But on everything else, I’m on board.
why do i need to read his book to find out what whether he belives 9/11 is an inside job. I’ve seen a few clips where he try to avoid answering, with one where he kinda suggested he was too busy to focus on 9/11 investigation without denying it when conspiracy theorist would press him on it.
I developed a bad taste for Ron Paul back during Y2K when a friend of mine became obsessed with Ron Paul and stocking up for Y2K. About 2003 our friendship took a blow when I didn't agree with her about "despising George W Bush" and all the conspiracy theories.
Yes, brain dead.
But many of them do find it convenient to cry about that scrap when their agenda is threatened.
will watch later.
I bet Dr Paul schooled Moore-on.
He did quite well....though Moore wasn’t there. Paul was just given a chance to “react” to a couple of clips. It would be fun to see them actually go head to head in person.
Paul has said over and over that he does NOT think 911 was an inside job and that he thinks Bin Laden did it. He hasn't "avoided" anything. The real conspiracy specialists these days are the birthers who have far more in common with the truthers than they'd like to admit. Fortunately, Paul hasn't got into that mess.
Completely agree.
Paul did however have a problem with The 9/11 Report -- NOT conspiracy nut stuff -- but rather that the Report was a CYA exercize that didn't go far enough in holding responsible those individuals & agencies who should have been minding the store and weren't.
bump
Republicans and Democrats haggle over ratios of Socialism vs capitalism, little capitalism. But when it doesn't work, Republicans get the blame with capitalism.
And I completely agree with Ron Paul.
Socialism (democrats) vs capitalism (libertarians) vs corporatism(Republicans) .
Republicans and Democrats haggle over ratios of Socialism vs corporatism since their lines are blurred, little capitalism. But when it doesn't work, Republicans get the blame for capitalism which is never tried .
I would admend
Democrat Leaders (Corporatist - favor bank, education, health, laywers)
vs
Republican Leaders (Corporatist - favor bank, industrial military complex, farming)
Democrat base = socialist
Republican base = capitalist
Of course Bush pushing TARP sealed the "Republicans love the rich" message democrats sent for 8 years
Who jumped into TARP? Those moderate Washington establishmentarians. Who is that? The Senate!
His foreign policy is consistent and I can’t find many people have who a consistent policy. The current policy is, “We’re not leaving but we won’t send more troops even though the military says without more troops we cannot win”. That being the policy my counter argument would be, ‘fine, then leave’. There is no clear objective there and as such I think the right thing to do is to pull the troops out.
Iraq: I didn’t think we should have gone in but we did so my position slowly became: Whatever is needed to win. The policy now is, We don’t know exactly what we want out of Iraq so we will say that we’re leaving but we’ll leave the troops there anyways and we wont’ discuss it. That being the policy my new position is, ‘fine, then leave’.
Either develop a coherent policy in Iraq and Afghanistan or leave.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.