Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Wake County NC] School board runoff must proceed, state board rules
Raleigh News & Observer ^ | October 28, 2009 | Thomas Goldsmith

Posted on 10/28/2009 10:16:25 PM PDT by MitchellC

State board of election members today decided that a closely watched runoff in a Wake County school board race should proceed.

On a 4-1 vote, board members ruled that candidate Cathy Truitt's name should remain on the ballot even though she sought to withdraw her request for a runoff. If her name gains the most votes, the school board would fill her seat.

John Tedesco, a critic of current school board policies, including forced busing for diversity and mandatory year-round schools, placed first in the Oct. 6 primary. Because he failed to gain a majority of votes, second-place finisher Truitt asked for a runoff. Then she changed her mind.

"We expected such from the board," Tedesco said. "We just hope there is time to educate nearly 7,000 voters who may have been confused by all the on/off mixed messages. We are mobilizing door knocks, mailings, phone calls, events and press conferences."

Board member Anita Earls said there should be a high bar against discounting votes that have already been cast, as they have been in early voting in the race.

"Proceeding with the runoff elections is required by state law," said Earls, a Democrat.

Truitt was not legally able to make a request to withdraw, Earls said.

If Truitt were to get the most votes in the Nov. 3 runoff, her position would be declared vacant under the law, Earls said.

Board member Bill Peaslee contested Earls' motion to have the election continue.

"If she wants to rescind it, I think it's her call," said Peaslee, a former state Republican Party chief who was the only dissenting vote. Asked to settle the question, the county elections board had passed the decision on to the state board.

"On Oct. 21, she came into our office and stated that she would like to withdraw her request if possible," said Cherie Poucher, director of the Wake County board of elections.

Poucher said that Truitt could still become a board member if she receives the most votes, because she has not officially withdrawn as a candidate.

"Or she can withdraw as a candidate -- then if she receives the most votes, the seat would be vacant when the new board is sworn in," Poucher said in an e-mail.

"(Incumbent) Horace Tart remains on the board until his successor is 'qualified.' But at this time that is a moot point since she has not withdrawn her candidacy."


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: raleigh; wakecounty
If Truitt were to get the most votes in the Nov. 3 runoff, her position would be declared vacant under the law, Earls said.

And if the seat is vacant, that leads to a 4-4 deadlock, which means the current social engineering policy does not get overturned.

If you live in Wake County's 2nd District, or know someone who does, get out the vote this coming Tuesday (Nov. 3rd)!

Earlier election results thread here.

1 posted on 10/28/2009 10:16:25 PM PDT by MitchellC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 100%FEDUP; 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; ~Vor~; A2J; a4drvr; Adder; Aegedius; Afronaut; alethia; ...
If you live in Wake County's 2nd District, or know someone who does, get out the vote this coming Tuesday (Nov. 3rd)!

Despite his opponent withdrawing from the race, the SBOE has ruled that John Tedesco needs to receive a majority of the vote this Tuesday to win the seat!



Earlier election results thread here.

NC *Ping*

Please FRmail MitchellC if you want to be added to or removed from this North Carolina ping list.
2 posted on 10/28/2009 10:24:23 PM PDT by MitchellC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC

Much appreciated.


3 posted on 10/29/2009 3:58:29 AM PDT by RangerM (A liberal is a man too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel - Robert Frost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC

Bump to the top


4 posted on 10/29/2009 8:44:48 AM PDT by MitchellC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RangerM

So Wake has no at-large seats on the school board?


5 posted on 10/29/2009 8:45:25 AM PDT by MitchellC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC

Thanks for the info. I live in the district, but in unincorporated area and that is the only issue I can vote on. If I hadn’t learned this I would have thought no need to go!


6 posted on 10/29/2009 2:32:32 PM PDT by nclaurel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nclaurel

No prob - please spread the word!


7 posted on 10/29/2009 10:45:10 PM PDT by MitchellC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC

Not that I’m aware of. Candidates are elected to represent respective districts.

That’s not to say they couldn’t run in multiple districts (AFAIK), however I have no idea what would happen if the same candidate won in two different districts. I don’t know the law in this matter.

My guess would be another runoff.


8 posted on 10/30/2009 4:04:52 AM PDT by RangerM (A liberal is a man too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel - Robert Frost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson