Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No men OR women needed: Scientists create sperm and eggs from stem cells
Daily Mail via The Woodward Report ^ | October 28, 2009 | Fiona Macrae

Posted on 10/28/2009 8:01:12 PM PDT by thisisthetime

Human eggs and sperm have been grown in the laboratory in research which could change the face of parenthood.

It paves the way for a cure for infertility and could help those left sterile by cancer treatment to have children who are biologically their own.

But it raises a number of moral and ethical concerns. These include the possibility of children being born through entirely artificial means, and men and women being sidelined from the process of making babies.

Opponents argue that it is wrong to meddle with the building blocks of life and warn that the advances taking place to tackle infertility risk distorting and damaging relations between family members.

The U.S. government-funded research also offers the prospect of a 'miracle pill' which staves off the menopause, allowing women to wait longer to have a child.

It centres on stem cells, widely seen as a repair kit for the body. Scientists at Stanford University in California found the right cocktail of chemicals and vitamins to coax the cells into becoming eggs and sperm.

The double success, published in the journal Nature, raises the prospect of men and women one day 'growing' their own sperm and eggs for use in IVF treatments.

(Excerpt) Read more at thewoodwardreport.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: eggs; godsgravesglyphs; homosexualagenda; science; sperms; stemcells
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-68 next last

1 posted on 10/28/2009 8:01:13 PM PDT by thisisthetime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thisisthetime

Brave New World.


2 posted on 10/28/2009 8:02:58 PM PDT by Lorica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thisisthetime

I still think its more fun the old fashioned way!


3 posted on 10/28/2009 8:03:40 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thisisthetime

No men or women needed. So where do they get the stem cells?


4 posted on 10/28/2009 8:04:15 PM PDT by taxesareforever (Release Staff Sgt. Frank Wuterich and let him and his family get on with their lives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorica

Stem cells just aren’t as much fun as a good romp in the hay. There will always be kids produced by, ahem, time-tested biological methods....


5 posted on 10/28/2009 8:05:59 PM PDT by freebilly (No wonder the left has a boner for Obama. There's CIALIS in soCIALISt....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thisisthetime
In the year 2525
6 posted on 10/28/2009 8:07:03 PM PDT by P.O.E.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxesareforever

Unicorns.


7 posted on 10/28/2009 8:07:51 PM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thisisthetime

looks like a harvesting nightmare.


8 posted on 10/28/2009 8:09:22 PM PDT by paltz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thisisthetime

Uh...weren’t we told that stem cell research was for helping the Christopher Reeves’ and Michael J Fox’s of the world?This helps them HOW????????


9 posted on 10/28/2009 8:19:08 PM PDT by massmike (...So this is what happens when OJ's jury elects the president....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thisisthetime

More catering to those obsessed with having biological children when they should obviously be looking to adopt.


10 posted on 10/28/2009 8:22:15 PM PDT by eclecticEel (The Most High rules in the kingdom of men ... and sets over it the basest of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.

LOL. That song started to play in my head when I saw this article.


11 posted on 10/28/2009 8:22:48 PM PDT by Ticonderoga34 (Free Obama's Birth Certificate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: massmike
Stem cell research has been ongoing. The Michael J Fox's of the world supported embryonic exclusively. Embryonic stem cell research has never yielded benefit. It is one of the most cancerous treatments known.

Adult stem cells, however, encompass virtually every single positive breakthrough you have ever heard about.
12 posted on 10/28/2009 8:26:55 PM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: taxesareforever
No men or women needed. So where do they get the stem cells?

Algore? He was the inspiration for 'Love Story', created the internet, was the see-all and end-all in predicting Goreball Warming. Maybe they cloned one of his chest hairs (if he has any which I seriously doubt) and created an all new improved human being. Big Al is capable, ya know?

13 posted on 10/28/2009 8:30:06 PM PDT by mplsconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: massmike

Yep. John Edwards told us that Christopher Reeve would get up out of the wheelchair and walk again, and he would have already done so in 2004, if not for Bush administration policy on embryonic stem cells.

Why are liberals/Democrats never called out on idiotic things that they say?????????


14 posted on 10/28/2009 8:30:51 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: thisisthetime
The U.S. government-funded research

On the upside, it'll lessen the need for a draft.

15 posted on 10/28/2009 8:34:10 PM PDT by glock rocks (Wait, what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic · subscribe ·

 
Gods
Graves
Glyphs
Just adding to the catalog, not sending a general distribution.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach
 

·Dogpile · Archaeologica · ArchaeoBlog · Archaeology · Biblical Archaeology Society ·
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google ·
· The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·


16 posted on 10/28/2009 8:44:47 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eclecticEel

Exactly!

Frozen embryos are stored, forgotten and thrown away, and still they find yet another way to produce children. More money for a non-life threatening situation and less for children dying of incurable diseases.


17 posted on 10/28/2009 8:50:14 PM PDT by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: glock rocks
On the upside, it'll lessen the need for a draft.

On the downside there will be 2 clone troopers for every citizen.

18 posted on 10/28/2009 8:50:40 PM PDT by Naspino (Not creative enough to have a tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: thisisthetime

It doesn’t matter how successful they are in doing this kind of stuff.

The old way of joining sperm and egg will forever be more popular.


19 posted on 10/28/2009 8:50:52 PM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thisisthetime

It also raises the question of the quality of humans created by this method. What if they all die by age 20?


20 posted on 10/28/2009 8:54:10 PM PDT by RobbyS (ECCE HOMO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

Our first question must be concerned with the race of these sperm and eggs:

IS THIS RACISM?


21 posted on 10/28/2009 9:00:22 PM PDT by donna (Chick-news. They report on what they love.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: thisisthetime

It would be great if genetic defects could be fixed, so offspring could be free from known heritable diseases. I hate the idea of passing down my bad back to future generations.


22 posted on 10/28/2009 9:00:54 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donna

yeah, if the “parent” is white! ;-) Does give a new meaning to bottle baby.


23 posted on 10/28/2009 9:06:14 PM PDT by RobbyS (ECCE HOMO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

I’m thinking about the implications for “government.” If the state can create its own serfs, they’ll just tax the hell out of everyone for the privilege of creating them and taking the jobs “citizens won’t do.” After a 100 years, what might you have? Make a heckuva sci-fi novel.


24 posted on 10/28/2009 9:06:29 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

What makes you think that those “defects” might not be useful in the evolutionary scheme?


25 posted on 10/28/2009 9:07:19 PM PDT by RobbyS (ECCE HOMO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: thisisthetime
This is so wrong. I'm not a Christian, nor I do subscribe to any religion, but to screw around on this level is just asking for trouble.

There is a natural order to things - whether created by a higher power or evolved or designed evolution. This sort of nonsense is an aberration to humanity and will only cause the end of the natural order of things on this planet.

What next? We only need certain cells in a lab to replicate mankind? We need not have women and men pro-create? Was this not the goal of the 1930's facists to create a superior race?

I don't care what your beliefs are, but this is extremely dangerous and who knows what the ultimate unintended consequences could be.

Google: "I Am Legend". This is a very very bad avenue to pursue. These types of advances in science without social controls scare me and should be put down as strongly as possible. There are too many opportunities for the wrong people to abuse such science. Think about how so many scientific discoveries have been abused. This would be the ultimate abuse on mankind.

I am dumbfounded that "scientists" (learned men/women) can't foresee the ultimate outcome of this. It will end in holocaust. Better to see the nukes drop now and end it all.

26 posted on 10/28/2009 9:07:22 PM PDT by A Navy Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradyLS

Do you think that the government could ever do that efficiently? We would get
ten baby Obama’s for every one Einstein.


27 posted on 10/28/2009 9:09:32 PM PDT by RobbyS (ECCE HOMO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet

What makes them think that scientists can see the future? Frankenstein anyone?


28 posted on 10/28/2009 9:12:17 PM PDT by RobbyS (ECCE HOMO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: thisisthetime

Here’s a weird question: Can you make an egg from a male’s stem cells?

Gay marriage just got a boost.


29 posted on 10/28/2009 9:14:47 PM PDT by WOSG (OPERATION RESTORE AMERICAN FREEDOM - NOVEMBER, 2010 - DO YOUR PART!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thisisthetime

Amazing that it can be done. I would love to see humans having the capability to regrow lost limbs. It seems like a sci fi thing, but I believe someday it will be. Crabs, starfish, and lobsters possess the genes that do it, and who knows, it may someday be used in humans. Far fetched or impossible? Hmmmmm, like so many other things were, to those who lived 200 years ago, when the fastest thing on wheels was a roman chariot.


30 posted on 10/28/2009 9:15:05 PM PDT by Bringbackthedraft (No 3rd Parties, the real winner will be the loser. A 3 party election needs a run off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bringbackthedraft

I’m more intrigued by advancements in robotics and artificial organs.

Regrowing a limb that’s just as good as a mint condition original organ or limb sounds good, but when you consider that we may be able to build a machine that’s 2x, 3x, 4x better, and in the case or external organs looks and feels natural, I’d opt for being a human/machine hybrid.

I think most people would.


31 posted on 10/28/2009 9:17:40 PM PDT by Ted Grant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Ted Grant

I’d opt for being a human/machine hybrid.

I think most people would ....................... Oh Yeah! I can then throw away the Viagra!


32 posted on 10/28/2009 9:26:57 PM PDT by Bringbackthedraft (No 3rd Parties, the real winner will be the loser. A 3 party election needs a run off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Ted Grant

Interfacing in a natural way with the nervous system would be the biggest challenge. When we can get a cyber replacement arm that can play piano as well as the arm that was lost, then we have news.

Of course, the process of growing a new arm would be ethically and morally troublesome if a whole new body had to be grown in order to get it.


33 posted on 10/28/2009 9:27:23 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (ACORN: Absolute Criminal Organization of Reprobate Nuisances)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Bringbackthedraft

Arrrrrgh... I’m just a love machine....


34 posted on 10/28/2009 9:28:01 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (ACORN: Absolute Criminal Organization of Reprobate Nuisances)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: BradyLS

Leave it up to the government and the human race will soon cease to exist.


35 posted on 10/28/2009 9:28:12 PM PDT by RobbyS (ECCE HOMO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

It is hard enough to get used to an artificial leg. The whole body has to adjust.


36 posted on 10/28/2009 9:29:45 PM PDT by RobbyS (ECCE HOMO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.

Oh my gosh, you and I were thinking on the same wave-length! I was just thinking of a line in that song; where it says something like: “Not going to need a husband, nor need your wife-
you’ll pick your son, pick your daughter too-
from the bottom of a long glass tube”. I don’t have the exact lyrics handy, so I’ll have to paraphrase them partly! That is just weird, isn’t it?


37 posted on 10/28/2009 9:39:15 PM PDT by dsutah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: eclecticEel
"More catering to those obsessed with having biological children when they should obviously be looking to adopt."

No sh*t. I want. I want. I want. Therefore, I deserve. Sorry, you can't reproduce, but there are thousands and thousands of children around the World you could adopt.

So, science and society should change the entire natural order of this planet to please who WANT, not need?

While I understand the inherent desires of a couple to have their own bio-children, I am disgusted with this entire idea of mixing human male sperm and female eggs in a petri dish to produce a human being. This is simply obscene.

What's next? Manipulated DNA with the male sperm and the female egg to produce a specific human product??? That would be the next step down into the Marxist playground.

As I said in another thread, this was a goal of Hitler's master race experiments.

If this happens, our children and grand-children will grow up watching the end of humanity as we know it. They will have no human compass bearing. They will be taught it is good in the public school system and grow up believing it is the way of the New World Order. Think ATLAS SHRUGGED!

This crap and more that is growing and is coming will absolutely destroy this nation. I'm done. I've got my supplies.

38 posted on 10/28/2009 9:50:14 PM PDT by A Navy Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: allmost

These were embryonic stem cells.


39 posted on 10/28/2009 9:53:57 PM PDT by ColdWater ("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: thisisthetime
Soon we won't even need to have sex......we will just split in half like amoebas.
40 posted on 10/28/2009 9:56:53 PM PDT by Morgana (zero, Harry, Nancy, Only three of them, against the rest of us! Don't forget that America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
"What makes them think that scientists can see the future? Frankenstein anyone?"

Who is "them"?

41 posted on 10/28/2009 9:57:27 PM PDT by A Navy Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater
The American team used stem cells taken from embryos in the first days of life but hope to repeat the process with slivers of skin.

The originals, being embryonic were most likely cancerous. All that is known is that they weren't viable and the researchers are looking for alternatives.
42 posted on 10/28/2009 10:00:57 PM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: allmost
The originals, being embryonic were most likely cancerous.

Source?

43 posted on 10/28/2009 10:03:55 PM PDT by ColdWater ("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater
These were embryonic stem cells.

Our tax dollars at work.
44 posted on 10/28/2009 10:05:17 PM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

What source? They all are. Name one instance where embryonic cells have not become cancerous. One success, please prove me wrong...


45 posted on 10/28/2009 10:07:00 PM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

“There will always be kids produced by, ahem, time-tested biological methods....”

As in................................................doing the nasty.....getting it on.....doing the wild thing.....?


46 posted on 10/28/2009 10:13:12 PM PDT by Morgana (zero, Harry, Nancy, Only three of them, against the rest of us! Don't forget that America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: allmost
What source? They all are. Name one instance where embryonic cells have not become cancerous. One success, please prove me wrong...

The article above?

47 posted on 10/28/2009 10:13:28 PM PDT by ColdWater ("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

I quoted them in post #42. They are looking for skin cells. You seem to be more arguing than responding.


48 posted on 10/28/2009 10:16:14 PM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet

I should say our elites. By and large they know nothing of science, or scientists. They don’;t know how it is crafted, or that scientists are simply people who are good at their job but are less capable of predicting the remote future of their field than many science fiction writers.


49 posted on 10/28/2009 10:32:54 PM PDT by RobbyS (ECCE HOMO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

Embryonic stem cell research is a bit like atomic fusion. Hard to make a “bottle “that will contain it.


50 posted on 10/28/2009 10:34:35 PM PDT by RobbyS (ECCE HOMO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson