Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Obama Impeachable?
The New Media Journal ^ | Oct 28, 2009 | Paul R. Hollrah

Posted on 10/28/2009 9:01:30 AM PDT by NewMediaJournal

Article II, Section 4 of the United States Constitution tells us that “The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.” In the history of the United States there have been only three Presidential impeachment proceedings:

Following the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, his successor, Andrew Johnson, served some two years, seven months, and six days before the first articles of impeachment were lodged against him.

Richard Nixon served four years, three months, and ten days before the Washington Post published a report tying the Watergate burglars to his 1972 reelection campaign. There were immediate calls for his impeachment.

Bill Clinton served five years, six months, and twenty-eight days before perjuring himself before a federal grand jury and before a federal judge. There were immediate calls for his impeachment.

In more recent times, Democrats seized upon the Iraq war as a means of doing political damage to George W. Bush. And although Democratic congressional leaders had been privy to the same intelligence reports that the Bush Administration used as the basis for the invasion of Iraq, their support for the war quickly turned to calls for Bush’s impeachment. Bush was in office for two full years on the day that American troops invaded Iraq and Democrats began calling for his impeachment.

Now it appears that Barack Obama may be setting a new record of sorts.

(Excerpt) Read more at newmediajournal.us ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bho44; bhoimpeachment; bhotreason; bhotyranny; birthcertificate; citizenship; democrats; impeachment; obama; third100days
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-69 next last

1 posted on 10/28/2009 9:01:31 AM PDT by NewMediaJournal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NewMediaJournal

Not with this Congress. Bring it up again if real conservatives gain a majority after the next election.


2 posted on 10/28/2009 9:06:23 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (III)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewMediaJournal

As a practical matter, no.


3 posted on 10/28/2009 9:09:49 AM PDT by Maceman (])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewMediaJournal

Good to see it in print. I don’t think he makes it one term. I truly believe that this poser can be impeached in 2011.


4 posted on 10/28/2009 9:12:04 AM PDT by SueRae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewMediaJournal
When the criminals control the justice system then they are untouchable.
As we have learned from the past, a Republican legislature produces a bunch of RINO’s dancing about, pleading for attention, like circus monkeys.
5 posted on 10/28/2009 9:14:49 AM PDT by Hans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewMediaJournal

We don’t want President Biden, do we???


6 posted on 10/28/2009 9:16:33 AM PDT by SierraWasp ("Homeland Defense" begins at HOME!!! He who hesitates, is LOST!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewMediaJournal

Before you can impeach him for anything, you have to establish that he is legitimately the president of the United States.

However, before you can legitimize his presidency, it has to be successfully challenged in court to the highest levels and withstand the test of scrutiny unless he is forthcoming with irrefutable proof that he is a natural born citizen on his own.

IT IS A LOOPHOLE THAT HAS BEEN EXPLOITED BY OUR ENEMIES!

Do not even begin to try and tell me that the people smart and powerful enough to put him into office DIDN’T KNOW that he was born in Kenya... DAMB STRAIGHT THEY KNEW!

Tying this crap up in court is part of their strategy...
because if it is ever discovered and exposed that he has violated his oath of office, he has the perfect means of escaping justice on a technicality that can be tied up in court indefinitely.

The weak link is liberal control of congress.
That is why the dems are so hell bent on railroading these major pieces of legislation through that will ensure their control of power as indefinitely as Obama’s legal defenses.

The first act of a republican controlled house AND Senate should be to force the president to establish his legitimacy as president.


7 posted on 10/28/2009 9:20:12 AM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

“Not with this Congress. Bring it up again if real conservatives gain a majority after the next election.”

Yep


8 posted on 10/28/2009 9:21:47 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hans
When the criminals control the justice system then they are untouchable.

Bingo.

That is why bipartisanship is so stupid, those compromises allow the criminals to remain in positions where they can gain control of the system when the opportunity arises, and it always does.

So many in the 0bamunist government should be ex cons, having served time for treason and fraud, but for soft Republican prosecutors and office holders.

The Rats won't make that mistake.

9 posted on 10/28/2009 9:31:37 AM PDT by Navy Patriot (Sarah and the Conservatives will rock your world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
We don’t want President Biden, do we???

At least he'd be legal. And the state-run media would not be as inclined to fall on every political grenade in order to protect the goofy old white guy.

10 posted on 10/28/2009 9:36:16 AM PDT by Charles Martel ("Endeavor to persevere...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Safrguns
It's just my opinion, but even IF (and that's a really big word in this context) you could prove he is not qualified to serve as POTUS, he is, in fact, half-American and it would cause a major upheaval in the country, as over half of America believes he's qualified (so winning the battle may lose the war).

Second, although I truly “feel” his dithering behavior with regard to the troops being slaughtered in Afghanistan is treasonable, the most I can prove is he has terrible judgment — hardly an impeachable offense.

Third, he is distancing himself from the “unconstitutional acts” of an out of control Congress by “letting them” draft unconstitutional policies and programs into law. He slips the punch, again, by saying he can only veto, he has no say in what he's given to sign.

I can see nothing being done unless or until the complexion of Congress changes drastically. Then we'll see if his judgment improves, he'll certainly wait until then to put his name on any legislation, so he can honestly say to his loyal constituents, “See I tried to give you hope and change, but the far right wing made it impossible.” He's an empty suit, but that is the beauty of the puppeteers who put him up and got him elected.

We need to change the make-up of the House and Senate, if we're going to do this without civil unrest.

11 posted on 10/28/2009 9:38:03 AM PDT by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NewMediaJournal
The list of successors is scary.
1. BR-549 Biden
2. Bad Sister Act Nancy

We need to wait and see who wins in the '10 elections.

12 posted on 10/28/2009 9:41:19 AM PDT by Voter#537 (Drinking Doubles Causing Lots of Trouble. F.U.B.O.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitutions Grandchild

What a poorly written article.
Andrew Jackson and Bill Clinton were IMPEACHED. That is impeachment preceedings were brought against them, the full House voted, and the articles passed. Both were not convicted in the Senate, and so remained in office. To be removed you must be Impeached and Convicted.

Nixon was not impeached.

How someone can write an article about this and confuse the facts and definitions so completely is a mystery.


13 posted on 10/28/2009 9:44:33 AM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NewMediaJournal

For what? taking powers on to himself that are not granted by the Constitution? for seizing control of private companies? for forcing private businesses to pay what the government dictates?


14 posted on 10/28/2009 9:48:29 AM PDT by Leftism is Mentally Deranged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewMediaJournal

He should be, although with dim majorities in Congress it isn’t gonna happen.

IMO, he should have already been thrown out on his rear.


15 posted on 10/28/2009 9:49:27 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (Hope....Change...Food Stamps!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewMediaJournal

Why try to impeach someone who is so good at shooting himself in the foot?


16 posted on 10/28/2009 9:51:32 AM PDT by jongaltsr (Hope to See ya in Galt's Gulch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black

Certainly can’t argue with you.


17 posted on 10/28/2009 9:53:01 AM PDT by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NewMediaJournal; LucyT

You cannot impeach an usurper who is an illegal alien residing int the W.H.!!!


18 posted on 10/28/2009 9:57:33 AM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitutions Grandchild

“he is, in fact, half-American and it would cause a major upheaval in the country, as over half of America believes he’s qualified (so winning the battle may lose the war).”

Doesn’t matter if he’s 3/4 American. HE’S NOT AMERICAN BORN. And what about the OTHER half of the country who believe he’s NOT qualified according to the Constitution?

IF his non-US birth can be proven, and I think eventually it will come out, then how about charging him (and how about the entire Democratic party) with FRAUD. IOW, KNOWINGLY withholding and deceiving the American citizens. Tell me HE doesn’t know the truth and I’ll eat one of my cats. (not really - I’m vegetarian).


19 posted on 10/28/2009 10:01:21 AM PDT by fivecatsandadog (You better HOPE you end up with more than a little CHANGE in your pocket when he's finished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: danamco

No. But you can EVICT him and his clan. Toss them out on their butts. And change the locks. A lot simpler and quicker than impeachment. Anyone with an ounce of moral fortitude wouldn’t stand for anything less.


20 posted on 10/28/2009 10:06:17 AM PDT by fivecatsandadog (You better HOPE you end up with more than a little CHANGE in your pocket when he's finished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: danamco; BP2; mojitojoe; pissant; Red Steel; Vendome
Until some judge abides by his/her oath to the Constitution and we the people, discovery will not happen which can determine the answer to this question, because the affirmative action liar may in fact be a criminal fraud and not even legally sworn in to the office.

Until discovery occurs, we the people will be at the mercy of the democrat party fraudulent usurpation of what was supposed to be OUR government.

Folks thought that perhaps a retired Marine in SanDiego sitting a federal bench there would at minimum allow discovery to go forward, to answer the questions posed by the juxtaposition of eligibility and usurpation if the bastard is in fact fraudulently holding the office the pirate John Roberts swore him into --TWICE-- as a sham display of legitimacy.

The only way an impeachment will be allowed is as a means to cover the democrat party's collective criminal butts, by making a show of removing a bad president while covering up the complicity of the marxist/fascist democrats who put him into the nomination thinking he could accomplish the 'change' to complete/irreversible federal oligarchy democrats have lusted for lo these many decades.

21 posted on 10/28/2009 10:06:40 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Dems, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: NewMediaJournal

Similar to the chances of winning a Three Card Monty Game in Canal and Broadway, in plain lingo: slim to none and in ain’t happening!!!!!!


22 posted on 10/28/2009 10:11:31 AM PDT by seoul62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

PING!


23 posted on 10/28/2009 10:11:32 AM PDT by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I predict that the Dems will try to fire up their base by running ads alluding to the possibility if Congress switches hands.
The unintended consequence will be getting out the vote in record numbers for the Right...


24 posted on 10/28/2009 10:13:43 AM PDT by Maverick68 (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: fivecatsandadog
Please don’t eat the cats.

1) “IF his non-US birth can be proven, and I think eventually it will come out, then how about charging him (and how about the entire Democratic party) with FRAUD. IOW, KNOWINGLY withholding and deceiving the American citizens.” Having spent 40 years in the “law” business, I’d like to meet the man or woman who could prove that the entire Democratic Party “KNOWINGLY” foisted this guy on us. Heck, we can’t even prove they’re literate as they seem to be having some difficulty with lengthy bills.

2) “And what about the OTHER half of the country who believe he’s NOT qualified according to the Constitution?” I wish I shared your optimism that “the other HALF of the country” gave a rat’s behind if he is or isn’t qualified. They’re too busy sweating out the recession and trying to make ends meet.

Just my opinion, except for the part about the cats. ;-)

25 posted on 10/28/2009 10:15:16 AM PDT by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp

At least I believe Biden Loves America... And he is a true american.. Red but at least he legal.


26 posted on 10/28/2009 10:20:31 AM PDT by crazydad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black

One minor correction: It was Andrew Johnson (Lincoln’s second VP) and Bill Clinton who were impeached although Jackson probably could have also been impeached if the dems had not ruled congress at the time.


27 posted on 10/28/2009 10:21:08 AM PDT by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black

Good points..


28 posted on 10/28/2009 10:23:02 AM PDT by charles1252
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire; seekthetruth; television is just wrong; jcsjcm; BP2; Pablo Mac; April Lexington; ...

“The debate over Obama’s eligibility is far more than just an “academic” exercise. Regardless of his self-serving view on the matter, his status as a “natural born” U.S. citizen is one that must be examined and resolved.

If he does not qualify as a natural born citizen, then every one of his acts in office...every bill signed into law, every appointment, every act of every appointee...will immediately become null and void. We cannot allow him to do that to our country.”


29 posted on 10/28/2009 10:23:47 AM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: fivecatsandadog

How would you do that???


30 posted on 10/28/2009 10:59:19 AM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

“The debate over Obama’s eligibility is far more than just an “academic” exercise. Regardless of his self-serving view on the matter, his status as a “natural born” U.S. citizen is one that must be examined and resolved.

If he does not qualify as a natural born citizen, then every one of his acts in office...every bill signed into law, every appointment, every act of every appointee...will immediately become null and void. We cannot allow him to do that to our country.””

The country will survive reversing everything that NObama has signed, casting away all his CZARS, every6thing much more easily than allowing him to stay there and continue this systematic dismantling of the the USA.


31 posted on 10/28/2009 11:08:33 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp; NewMediaJournal
"We don’t want President Biden, do we???

On his views of policy issues? No. However, at the very least, there would be no question of his Constitutional qualifications as he was born in country to two citizen parents who owed allegiance (when Biden was born) to no other country.

32 posted on 10/28/2009 11:19:39 AM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: danamco; NewMediaJournal; LucyT
"You cannot impeach an usurper who is an illegal alien residing int the W.H.!!!"

Correct. Impeachment is reserved for a (Constitutionally qualified) POTUS. Barry was born to a foreign national father, and was born with his birth "status" governed by Great Britain. Barry even admits to this on his campaign web site. So, how in the world can a dual national (assuming HI birth, yet to be proven) AT BIRTH be considered a Natural Born Citizen of the U.S. that the Constitution requires?

33 posted on 10/28/2009 11:25:38 AM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: NewMediaJournal; rxsid; rocco55; thouworm; GOPJ; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; ...
You cannot impeach an usurper who is an illegal alien residing in the W.H.!!!"

Correct. Impeachment is reserved for a (Constitutionally qualified) POTUS.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

.

34 posted on 10/28/2009 11:31:32 AM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

How about PHYSICAL REMOVAL by We the People and the US Military???? Many countries on this planet have gone this route. Not pretty but neither was their tyrant and surrounding syncophants!! A boiling point will come I’m sure. CO


35 posted on 10/28/2009 11:52:34 AM PDT by Canadian Outrage (Conservatism is to a country what medicine is to a wound - HEALING!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel

Great point!! CO


36 posted on 10/28/2009 11:53:40 AM PDT by Canadian Outrage (Conservatism is to a country what medicine is to a wound - HEALING!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

That is how I see it too. How can a man, NOT QUALIFIED to even hold the Office, be allowed to be the COMMANDER AND CHIEF of the entire United States, signing sweeping laws into existance? Sending the Military into harms way? ALL ILLEGALLY? Those surrounding him who knowingly pulled this off should be thrown out also. The entire White House needs to be swept clean. I frankly, DO NOT BELIEVE there is no answer for this. Come to think of it, the Supreme Court should be swept out the door also. I have never witnessed anything like this in my life. Not in a country with so many so called safe guards against such things. Fraud, Lies, Treason - ALL of them apply. CO


37 posted on 10/28/2009 12:02:05 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (Conservatism is to a country what medicine is to a wound - HEALING!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: NewMediaJournal

Nixon was never impeached.


38 posted on 10/28/2009 12:20:22 PM PDT by ichabod1 ( I am rolling over in my grave and I am not even dead yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

No matter how you look at this it’s a real mess.


39 posted on 10/28/2009 12:25:04 PM PDT by azishot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Safrguns

That would be very friendly a thing to do upon taking the house would it? Haven’t we been through enough? It’s time to start reaching out across the aisle.


40 posted on 10/28/2009 12:31:21 PM PDT by ichabod1 ( I am rolling over in my grave and I am not even dead yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ichabod1

>>> That would be very friendly a thing to do upon taking the house would it? Haven’t we been through enough? It’s time to start reaching out across the aisle.

I think I’m gonna puke.

Surely your joking... hehe... if so, nice one.


41 posted on 10/28/2009 2:07:26 PM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Constitutions Grandchild

>>> It’s just my opinion, but even IF (and that’s a really big word in this context) you could prove he is not qualified to serve as POTUS, he is, in fact, half-American and it would cause a major upheaval in the country, as over half of America believes he’s qualified (so winning the battle may lose the war).

The major upheaval would be the exposure of the biggest fraud perpetrated against the American people in it’s entire history. If he is not qualified to be POTUS, he knowingly committed fraud in all 50 states.

Half of Americans believe he is qualified because the media didn’t do it’s job. That would be the other half of the major upheaval. (which is already underway)

What does this man have to do in order to prove that the destruction of America and it’s constitution is at the core of his agenda? I’m starting to wonder if even half of the American people could answer that question, because they don’t really understand what the constitution is.


42 posted on 10/28/2009 2:14:27 PM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Correction, thanks to a fellow freeper who caught this/my mistake: Judge Carter is in Santa Ana, not in SanDiego ... a few miles difference there!


43 posted on 10/28/2009 3:16:59 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Dems, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Safrguns
Obama promises:

Pre-election:
to fundamentally transform America [ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvJJP9AYgqU ]

Post election, to ACORN:
ACORN to shape his agenda even before inauguration [ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3zCERmbgH0&feature=related ]

44 posted on 10/28/2009 3:33:56 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Dems, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: NewMediaJournal

Impeachment is for legitimate Presidents, Vice Presidents, and other civil officers of the United States, on grounds of Treason, Bribery and other high Crimes and Misdemeaners, not for usurpers!


45 posted on 10/28/2009 4:10:51 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
If he does not qualify as a natural born citizen, then every one of his acts in office...every bill signed into law, every appointment, every act of every appointee...will immediately become null and void. We cannot allow him to do that to our country.”

Obama has proven to me that he does not qualify by defending litigation meant to reveal his birth documents. Like millions of other Americans, I therefore have no intention of conforming to any law signed under his bogus hand. They are not laws of the land, and never will be.

46 posted on 10/28/2009 6:29:54 PM PDT by Candor7 (The effective weapons against Fascism are ridicule, derision, and truth (Member NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: LucyT; MHGinTN; El Gato; Fred Nerks; null and void; OldDeckHand
Correct. Impeachment is reserved for a (Constitutionally qualified) POTUS.

At this point in time, even with a court overturning his eligibility, appeals would extend through the rest of his term of office. The Congress wouldn't touch this with the present leadership of Pelosi and Reid so it's imperative the Democrats hold on to power majorities. But if the Republicans take over Congress and a larger number of Governorships in January of 2011, anything can happen and quickly.

If Obama oversteps his authority, declares another national emergency or a series of national emergencies prior to the midterm elections in 2010 curtailing speech, the press (in the cases of Fox and Talk Radio), shuts down the Internet, restricts travel and assembly (no more Tea Parties) and does further harm to commerce, it's all moot. We'll be at war.
47 posted on 10/28/2009 7:00:17 PM PDT by BIGLOOK (Government needs a Keelhauling now and then.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: BIGLOOK
America is already at war, with al Qaeda and radical Islam. what is more likely to happen in the coming months is the worsening of the U.S. economy as the democrat party institutes cap and tax and the obamacare debacle, plummeting US into debt we cannot recover from if he stays at the helm.

THEN the enemy we are at war with will strike as our economic resilience has been destroyed by democrat marxists in the Cloward-Piven strategy, perhaps killing thousand, even tens of thousands and wrecking commerce to finally end our economic empowerment and bring US down.

The democrap party has been planning the demise of the U.S. economy for some time now as their means to fundamentally transform America. They now have their wet-dream marxist in the White House and control of Congress to accomplish the end of the Republic and instituting of their long sought for federal oligarchy.

What the treacherous democrat fools did not put into their calculations as they planned a structured demise of the U.S. economy was the ability of radical Islam to create such havoc that the nation could not survive independently, economically, when the assault from enemies foreign is combined with the assault from enemies domestic --the Van Jones, John Holdrens, Cass Sunsteins, Jeff JOnes, Obamanoids, etc.

We may be living in the last months of American independence, about to enter the 'new age' of U.N. government over US ... just to survive the wrecking the radical leftist/Marxist democrat party has planned for US.

48 posted on 10/28/2009 7:31:53 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Obots, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

I would think that Biden would be just as illegal as Obama. Obama picked him and he should be out of there. Pelosi????Could she possibly worse than even Obama? Who is in line after her?


49 posted on 10/29/2009 1:54:59 AM PDT by Bellflower (If you are left DO NOT take the mark of the beast and be damned forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp

“We don’t want President Biden, do we???”

Instead of Hussein? Absolutely! In a skinny minute. Biden’s as dumb as a stump, but not overtly evil and most likely doesn’t hate America as does his boss.


50 posted on 10/29/2009 5:51:52 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson