Posted on 10/27/2009 10:43:42 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
At old British base, US and India train for new wars
Manu Pubby Posted: Oct 27, 2009 at 0841 hrs
BABINA (JHANSI) After a tough fight, Indian forces manage to capture Abu Abida, the dreaded warlord who, with the covert support of a neighbouring state, had been pushing in heavily armed insurgents to subvert the country. As the terrorist is escorted out of the war zone with the help of American forces, the convoy is attacked by militants trying to free him. Within minutes, Indian and US Army soldiers mount a rescue mission, pummelling the enemy village with tank and Infantry Combat Vehicle (ICV) fire. US troops are air-dropped by Indian helicopters to mop up the remains. The setting might as well be Iraq or Afghanistan, where US troops face such situations on routine basis, but this is in fact a nondescript firing range 400 km south of Delhi where the two countries have just concluded their largest ever army exercise. Incidentally, the Babina range has a past dating back to the British days — its full form is British Army Base in North Asia.
While joint foreign deployments may be some time off, the most complex war game between the two countries has made one thing clear — India and US can now operate together in a hostile environment like Iraq or Afghanistan and deliver the goods.
“I will be comfortable going with the Indian Army anywhere, anytime,” said Lt Gen Benjamin Mixon, Commander, US Army, Pacific at the conclusion of a 15-day exercise that involved over 300 US troops and 17 Stryker ICVs brought in from Hawaii.
And he has reason to be confident. Before capturing Abida, the two armies launched an audacious attack on “an insurgent base”, complete with the destructive firepower of T-90 tanks, Stryker ICVs and bunker-busting capabilities of the US Javelin missile.
If Malabar 2007 was the turning point for Navy-Navy ties between the two countries and Red Flag 2008 redefined the relation between the two air forces, the anti-terror Yudh Abhyas that featured tanks, UAVs, ICVs, anti-tank missiles and heliborne operations has taken Army-Army ties to a new level.
There are a number of firsts in the exercise — the first mechanized infantry exercise, the largest deployment of Stryker ICVs outside Iraq and Afghanistan. But the important thing is that the two armies can now mount a joint armoured strike, take down terror camps and operate jointly in a counter-insurgency environment.
The Indian Army, however, was at pains to clarify that the war game was not directed against anyone. Director General of Military Operations (DGMO) Lt Gen A S Sekhon said it was “purely and purely” a training exercise.
While the Indian Army was complimented for its professionalism and interoperability was the buzz word, what made the difference between the two forces was technology. The US Army brought in its latest anti-tank ‘fire and forget’ Javelin missile, a generation ahead of the wire-controlled Milan still used by the Indian Army. The ‘fire and forget’ technology is something that the Army is looking for and the experience with the Javelin will help in making a qualified choice.
Similarly, the Raven mini-UAV used by US forces to get real time pictures of the battlefield is also something new for the Indian Army. Again, India is looking to buy similar infantry UAVs at the earliest and the experience of using them in a war game would give an insight into the product.
Tactics used by US forces in Iraq, where the Stryker unit taking part in the exercise was deployed six months ago,
were a learning experience for Indian soldiers. Expertise in bunker-busting, destroying buildings and taking on enemy camps with armoured vehicles may not be needed within the country but it doesn’t hurt to learn.
“The lessons we learnt are from the American experience in Afghanistan, particularly in terms of technology,” Sekhon said.
For US forces, the learning stemmed from the experience of Indian forces fighting insurgencies in the North-East and Jammu and Kashmir for decades. Some of the exercises carried out were on themes and terms that are very common in the Indian context. The two armies carried out a Road Opening Party (ROP) operation, something that the Army does on a daily basis in Kashmir — clearing mines, IEDs and possible ambushes along a road. Another thing practised was cordon-and-search operations in a hostile village.
“We would be able to work together as militaries. If there was a contingency, we would be better prepared to deal with it,” said Mixon.
India and US have conducted eight exercises under the Yudh Abhyas series that kicked off in 2004. The first Yudh Abhyas commenced at Chaubatiya in the Himalayan foothills, and was followed in 2005 with US Army contingents training with Indian troops at the Counter-Insurgency and Jungle Warfare School in Vairangte, Mizoram. In Yudh Abhyas 2006, Indian troops went to Hawaii for training. In 2007, there were two exercises, both at Fort Wainwright, Alaska. In 2008, the exercise shifted back to Hawaii.
Good infopacked article. Thanks.
Our relationship with India is going to grow in importance for both nations, as security interests become more intense.
I’m glad to see us doing more there.
I will say that it’s interesting to see us do fairly well with Pakistan, and India at the same time, considering their mistrust and differences with each other.
We’ve played our cards quite well with the both of them, by appearances.
>>fairly well with Pakistan, and India
The US balanced Greece and Turkey in NATO for decades, and also got Germany back in with Great Britain and France until France left NATO.
The US is rather wily when it wants to be.
Strykers airlifted to Jhansi, oh my.
Thanks for the response. Good points...
It seems that most nations around the world realize that the U.S. can be trusted to help and not take over.
I know we use some subterfuge at times, but when we leave there’s usually a stable government that is fairly decent to it’s people.
I agree with your wily comment, and that’s why it’s so painful when a Carter/Iran or Obama/Afghanistan moment comes along.
It’s like the CW held by many that the US abandoned Afghanistan after the Soviets left.
The truth is, contrary to what the Pakistanis say now, the US was asked to vamoose by the Pakistanis themselves as they wanted to establish their strategic influence in Afghanistan and didn’t want the US to be a player.
And talk about chutzpah, members of the US Congress decrying corruption in Afghanistan! They should know.
Absolutely.
Good points. I agree.
Congress? No kidding...
I agree.
Thanks Beeman.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.