Posted on 10/26/2009 2:18:30 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
You’re probably pretty close to the truth with that. It seems she was praising him until recently when she began trashing him.
These political opportunists are such a crock.
Yes, she met and liked Van Jones — and sung his praises. She also failed to vote more than a time or two over the years.
Naturally Rino Riordan would endorse her — the others have as well — a pox on all that. Maybe she ran e-bay well for a time but I don’t want her for governor.
As a native Los Angelino, NO on Meg Whitman... NO!!!!
no it isn’t just you!! I cannot stand to hear her ads!
I thought she was the one. John and Ken from KFI640 had her on last week. She spouted a lot of pretty sounding stuff but we all know how that goes. What they say and what they do are worlds apart. And, of course, her love of Van Jones wasn’t brought up at all.
Yeah, her ads are of the channel changing variety, aren’t they?
Oh she was pretty slick in the part of that interview I heard. No argument there. We have both had the same reaction.
Why was she supporting people in the past that don’t agree with any of what she was proposing last week? Why should I believe she would stick to what she believes now, if she didn’t stick to what she believed enough last year to support other people?
This lady is a political fraud IMO.
I agree. I won’t vote for her. She just registered with the Republican party a few months ago (not that that makes her a conservative). Where was she before that? Nowhere...except impressed with Van Jones.
Well, she was a campaign finance player on McCain’s team. That’s when my ears first perked up, because with that she was already mentioned as McCain’s and the R.P California leadership’s favorite to become our governor.
Her past donations weren’t to Conservatives either. This woman and the people she supported loathed Conservatives prior to this.
She’s just another shiny bobble to get us to take our eyes off the prize.
Poizner, unless I hear a good reason not to...
Either a new election or abolition of the office. If we abolish enough offices, maybe we can cut government down to a safer (for freedom and our wallets) size. A win-win! (If you abolish the office, say “Superintendent of Public Instruction, also gone are its subordinate and support positions, the whole entity that the “electee” would have controlled.)
Thanks for all the low-down on her. I don’t know anything about Poizner. I’m gonna have to get up to speed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.