Posted on 10/24/2009 8:51:57 PM PDT by rabscuttle385
CHARLESTON, S.C. (AP) — U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., drawing fire from energy industry group after saying he would seek bipartisan consensus on energy and global warming, said Friday reducing pollution and energy independence go together.
The lawmaker told reporters he wants a bill to do both.
(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...
Reducing Government and energy independence go together.
We the People told reporters we want to do both.
Not a religion, Lindsay?
Then why is your buddy Algore the televangelist
of the Global Climate Change Cult.
Methinks that Mister Grahamnesty's hijinx are a prelude to a run for the GOP pres nomination in a few years (laughter).
I suspect that political cross-dresser Grahamnesty's plan is to try to appeal to the indies with some cap-and-tax Crazy Ivan's, which will endear him to the NYT, the nets and the Daily Worker.
Hey, it worked for BFF John Sidney McCain, didn't it?
No Dice Lindsey ol' chum.
We "conservatives" just don't want you as our candidate.
At all, under ANY circumstance.
We want a candidate who is willing to stand up for principle, and who puts the American Way ahead of obvious ambition.
We conservatives must agree now to NOT SUPPORT LINDSEY GRAHAM, no matter what.
(Oh, and Lindsey. Big hugs to Uncle Arlen and fellow travelor Scozzafava.)
.
fellow travelor Scozzafava = fellow traveler Scozzafava
Is there anyone on here that explain this whole carbon thing to me? I thought Carbon was a part of every single thing on earth? I thought plants and trees needed Carbon Dioxide to live? How much freaking carbon is naturally in the atmosphere and does man in his piss ant existence even matter to the grand scheme of Carbon?
“saying he would seek bipartisan consensus on energy and global warming”
You can’t arrive at truth by counting noses.
"If you don't control carbon people are going to keep building coal-fired plants," he said. "You have to make carbon emissions such that it's worth your time to invest in wind solar and nuclear. I think carbon controls can be reasonably had without disrupting our economy."First off, this AP "writer" should go back to journalism school; there should be a comma between wind and solar.
But that's okay because it helps me point out that neither of those energy sources have the ability to be viable as neither of them has "energy potential" as does natural gas, gasoline, diesel, nuclear and coal.
|
RINOS |
Uber RINO Lindsey Ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
