Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gates Finds Broad Support for New Missile Defense Approach
DEFENSElink.mil - AMERICAN FORCES PRESS SERVICE ^ | October 23, 2009 | By Donna Miles

Posted on 10/24/2009 1:07:39 AM PDT by Cindy

Note: The following text is a quote:

American Forces Press Service

Gates Finds Broad Support for New Missile Defense Approach

By Donna Miles American Forces Press Service

BRATISLAVA, Slovakia, Oct. 23, 2009 – NATO defense ministers are expressing broad support for the new U.S. approach to missile defense in Europe and the opportunity it may offer to make Russia a partner in the effort, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said today.

Speaking to reporters during a NATO defense ministers conference here, Gates said he’s hearing “quite broad support for the new approach,” as well as “interest in extending our hand to the Russians to invite them to partner with us in this.”

Gates reported widespread agreement that the proposed changes “will provide for more capable and flexible missile defense systems sooner than was the case under the previous plan, and with a greater capacity to adapt as threats evolve.”

The new approach will make it easier for the United States to connect its systems to the allies’ radars and antimissile capabilities, as well as those of Russia, should it decide to participate, he said.

“We have said for a long time that we would welcome Russia” as a partner in missile defense, Gates said.

A radar system based in southern Russia “would be a real asset to the overall defense of Europe, particularly from Iranian missiles,” he told reporters. “This new system would make tying it in easier.”

NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen told reporters the plan "puts missile defense more in a NATO context," and that it will provide defense against "a real and growing" missile threat.

Much of today’s conference focused on NATO’s role in Afghanistan, Gates said. The ministers discussed the need to reform the International Security Assistance Force’s operational culture, to improve its ability to counter improvised explosive devices and to support the Afghan security force training mission.

Gates said he noted several NATO milestones during his discussions. The Kosovo security force obtained its initial operating capability, thanks in large measure to NATO’s role there, he said. In addition, NATO’s new, dedicated heavy airlift wing performed its first mission, resupplying Swedish forces in Afghanistan.

And after extensive effort, the allied ground surveillance program went into effect. The program is considered an essential element in increasing situational awareness for NATO forces.

Biographies: Robert M. Gates Related Sites: NATO NATO International Security Assistance Force Special Report: Travels With Gates


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; europe; iran; missiledefense; nato; russia

1 posted on 10/24/2009 1:07:40 AM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
SNIPPET from post no. 1:


"The new approach will make it easier for the United States to connect its systems to the allies’ radars and antimissile capabilities, as well as those of Russia, should it decide to participate, he said.

“We have said for a long time that we would welcome Russia” as a partner in missile defense, Gates said.

A radar system based in southern Russia “would be a real asset to the overall defense of Europe, particularly from Iranian missiles,” he told reporters. “This new system would make tying it in easier.”"

2 posted on 10/24/2009 1:08:54 AM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

A Look At Iran
http://www.truthusa.com/IRAN.html


3 posted on 10/24/2009 1:09:36 AM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

There is an idea floating around that places 4 Aegis class warships at strategic points around Europe to give the maximum coverage. I had a map of this but I do not know what I did with it.


4 posted on 10/24/2009 1:11:30 AM PDT by sonofstrangelove ("We will either find a way, or make one."Hannibal/Carthaginian Military Commander)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

That’s ok, the less said, probably better.

This is an interesting article especially when one considers how closely Russia has assisted in building those “peaceful nuclear energy” plants.


5 posted on 10/24/2009 1:19:21 AM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cindy
They said that we did not need a shield, now all of a sudden we need a shield??

Gate is a crude. He went from needing a shield (with Bush) to not needed a shield (with Obama) to now needing a shield again.

The man is a bad joke.

6 posted on 10/24/2009 1:24:13 AM PDT by Berlin_Freeper (Not White House Approved)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

Happy talk = 1000
Actual facts = 0

Sure they can connect the system up, but what actual anti missile capabilities does this one have that the other one didn’t?

Why does Russia suddenly not oppose an anti missile system for the first time since Ronald Reagan was president?

I’m sure that it’s either that Russia now loves us because Obama is our president, or Obama is such a great negotiator they couldn’t resist his charms. /s

Something is rotten in Denmark!


7 posted on 10/24/2009 1:56:09 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Deficit spending, trade deficits, unsecure mortages, worthless paper... ... not a problem. Oh yeah?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

Gates makes Kerry look like a bedrock of consistency. I wonder when he last expressed an opinion that lasted for more than a week.


8 posted on 10/24/2009 2:16:15 AM PDT by eclecticEel (The Most High rules in the kingdom of men ... and sets over it the basest of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

Tying Russia into this thing does not sound like a good idea at all. We would be turning over to them all our data on capabilities and the things they have to counter in their own missiles.


9 posted on 10/24/2009 2:34:30 AM PDT by arthurus ("If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

Given Russia’s double-dealing I would be reluctant to allow them to datalink into a secure NATO radar net. Imagine the possibilities if Russia wanted to ‘blind’ NATO for any reason?


10 posted on 10/24/2009 5:59:34 AM PDT by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cindy

I heard that we may even include China in the program.


11 posted on 10/24/2009 7:51:19 AM PDT by Thunder90 (Fighting for truth and the American way... http://citizensfortruthandtheamericanway.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson