Posted on 10/21/2009 7:16:06 PM PDT by USALiberty
She describes her role in the Obama administration as a communicator to the president and other public officials of "what it is Muslims want."
But Muslims such as Steven Schwartz, a prominent American convert to Islam and ardent critic of Muslim fundamentalism, contend Dalia Mogahed, a scheduled speaker at the annual fundraiser Saturday in Washington for the controversial Council on American-Islamic Relations', certainly doesn't speak for them.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Imam Ubama is giving us a caliphate mmm mmm mmm.
Makes one wonder who’s side they are on, doesn’t it?
Im just thinking out loud. When will this turn bloody ? What will be the tipping point The last straw ?
It won’t get that far. I’m thinking it’ll be a bloodless, from-the-top thing. It’ll be civilized and consistent with the oaths of those sworn to protect the Constitution.
All needs to come out now, before they crush Fox.
I’m more and more convinced which side they’re on.
I don’t wonder.
I don’t wonder. Islam is the true law of oppression and destruction (the destroyer and deceiver). A description of how Satan moves about the earth today. We are the last nation that hasn’t cast GOD away, even though as a nation under the current Facist administration is trying hard to break down our Christian roots, value and moral foundation and move us closer to muslim acceptance which I won’t accept. As far as bloodless, I don’t think that will be the case in this nation. There are too many individuals who strongly believe in our Christian values, freedoms and liberties to allow the islamist to take over our nation without a fight. I don’t think we will roll over like the europeans.
God Bless and may Christ bless you.
Apparently, the Muslim convert named Stephen Schwartz (must have been fun joining the local mosque!) disagrees with this lady's take on Sharia law. Okay. It's not as though doctrinal disputes never occur among followers of other religions.
Oh, and Schwartz didn't like her appearance on some British TV show for Muslims; apparently he feels that she didn't challenge a much-more militant guest enough.
Also, there's something about her knowing or speaking with an alleged unindicted co-conspirator involved in the 1993 WTC bombing. Now that's tricky, since "unindicted co-conspirator" is a bogus term. It has no legal meaning. So I have no idea what this guy's "involvement" may have been.
This lady also is on a panel (the name of the panel is unspecified) that's part of the White House Office of Faith-Based and Local Projects (this group had a slightly different name under Bush). Her title is not specified, and it's not specified whether she is a paid or unpaid advisor.
This lady is (or was) scheduled to speak at an upcoming CAIR conference that some non-CAIR fans are threatening hotel boycotts over. There's some confusion about whether or not she'll be making an appearance.
Oh, and there are a couple plugs for a WND book called Muslim Mafia.
All in all, a typical WND article that leaves me scratching my head.
Don’t advisors have to take that oath to protect and defend the constitution? How is it Obama has gotten away with appointing so many radicals to important positions?
The national Socialist movement is hiding nothing anymore. Obama and his masters who handle him and the other commie stooges in Congress and the Senate are being brazen, and still most of the nation is sleeping. But a core appears to be waking to this threat. Still, I am stunned at how brazen this administration and it’s puppet media have been in not just telegraphing their plans but in implementing them. Incrementalism was working like a dream. I am shocked that they have decided to go for it all on one roll of the dice. They are over-reaching and they risk waking up the middle class and setting back the Socialist movement by decades. I can only hope, but then again, they could entrench Socialism for good if they can keep enough of the sheeple sleeping. It is a hell of a risk, and the tea parties show that many who were sleeping are now wide awake in opposition to our Socialist threat.
When I said it would be largely bloodless, I meant that people with access to overwhelming force — people who also are SWORN to protect the Constitution — likely will step in to keep the peace when they see the fascists start to go too far. Violent revolution will be unnecessary if those in uniform remember their oaths before things get out of hand. Nothing keeps the peace better than control of overwhelming firepower and a respect for the Constitution.
Keep in mind that we have lots of people in uniform sworn to protect the Constitution from ALL enemies — foreign and DOMESTIC.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.