Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Britain's population to hit 70 MILLION by 2029 (YES, IMMIGRATION)
telegraph.co.uk ^ | 21 Oct 2009 | telegraph.co.uk

Posted on 10/21/2009 7:02:13 AM PDT by VU4G10

Britain's population to hit 70 million by 2029 The population of Britain is set to increase at its fastest rate in at least a century, driven by an immigrant 'baby boom'.

Published: 10:16AM BST 21 Oct 2009

Sustained growth of the level predicted has not been seen in at least a century Photo: PA In just 24 years it will increase by 10 million - and hit 70 million in 2029, the Office for National Statistics said.

That is less than half the time it took to go from 50 to 60 million between 1948 and 2005.

Every year 425,000 more people will be living here, the equivalent of a city the size of Bristol.

Immigrant numbers have fallen only 10,000 from the last ONS projections two years ago.

They predict 180,000 new arrivals every year over the next quarter century.

When the immigrant 'baby boom' is taken into account, migration will account for two thirds of population growth.

It took 50 years for the population to increase from 40 to 50 million between 1898 and 1948.

Home Secretary Alan Johnson said earlier this year that he "did not lie awake at night" worrying about the population hitting 70 million.

Guy Goodwin, ONS director of population statistics, said the vast bulk of the population increase would be in England.

Across Britain the total will hit 71.6 million in 2033 from just over 61 million now. Of those 60.7 million will be living in England.

"The failure of Labour to control immigration has left us in this difficult position

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: aliens; immigration; invasion; uk

1 posted on 10/21/2009 7:02:13 AM PDT by VU4G10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: VU4G10

National and cultural suicide. We are on the same path.


2 posted on 10/21/2009 7:04:10 AM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10

And they are no longer an oil exporter, but I’m sure the new service economy will work out just fine with such a wonderful diverse population.


3 posted on 10/21/2009 7:04:14 AM PDT by junta (S.C.U.M. = State Controlled Unreliable Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10

4 posted on 10/21/2009 7:10:26 AM PDT by VU4G10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10
Certainly apropo for Paul Ehrlich to bring out his seminal work in a new edition.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Population_Bomb

5 posted on 10/21/2009 7:11:55 AM PDT by bsf2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10

I guess that old chestnut about “No sex, please, we’re British” wasn’t just a punchline....


6 posted on 10/21/2009 7:17:08 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

The time is growing close to when we will need to take back our country...(British..are you listening also?)


7 posted on 10/21/2009 7:18:08 AM PDT by Boonie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10

The time has come for the USA to take custody of Britain’s nuclear arsenal.


8 posted on 10/21/2009 7:21:59 AM PDT by BenLurkin (Brave amateurs....they do their part.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10

goatlover takeover


9 posted on 10/21/2009 7:32:29 AM PDT by Dewey Revoltnow (BHO U R A POS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10

Churchill is rolling in his grave. All his efforts to save Britain could well end up being wasted.


10 posted on 10/21/2009 8:04:46 AM PDT by cvq3842 (A fool and his liberty are soon parted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cvq3842

The non Muslims need Tea Parties.


11 posted on 10/21/2009 8:09:09 AM PDT by Achilles Heel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia
National and cultural suicide. We are on the same path.

At least our imports are Christians not Muslims.

12 posted on 10/21/2009 8:14:29 AM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

Maybe where you live, but there are as many Muslims here in Northern Virginia and Maryland, adjacent to the District, as there are Hispanics. At take a look at Michigan.


13 posted on 10/21/2009 8:19:20 AM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Boonie
The time is growing close to when we will need to take back our country

Maybe you clearly define "take back our country".

If you are talking about kicking the mostly Caucasian democrat liberals out of Congress, I'm with you.

If you are talking about an ethnic cleansing of the US citizens like the wwII roundup of the Japanese, forget it.

And since when do you define who is "our country" (aka "us") and who is "their country" (aka "them")

Pleae clarify who is "us" and who is "them".

14 posted on 10/21/2009 8:22:19 AM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

“National and cultural suicide. We are on the same path.”

Ours could be worse, with a psychopath in the White House.


15 posted on 10/21/2009 9:03:37 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

Guess it depends. The Brits already have a socialist system in place, one that was planted right after World War II, and extended their wartime misery well into the 1950s. What we should learn from them: once these socialist institutions, such as National Health, are established, it is impossible to root them out.


16 posted on 10/21/2009 9:08:23 AM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: cvq3842

Churchill saving Britain? True. How about Charlemagne and Charles Martel saving Europe?


17 posted on 10/21/2009 9:09:55 AM PDT by benjibrowder (For Neda. May God bless those fighting for freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

“At least our imports are Christians not Muslims. “

They are beheading more people in Mexico and bringing their
narco terror here than the Muslims are.
Our imports do NOT practice civilized Christianity. But keep giving yourself that false notion of security and see where it gets us.

Report: Mexico One Of Most Dangerous Places For Reporters To Work
Voice of America - Bernard Shusman - 18 hours ago
http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&ct2=us%2F0_0_s_0_0_t&usg=AFQjCNHk2LR4boAkYQs1Enc9HSWJafmqMQ&sig2=bpf42hEr-S3d429Gy3q_Mg&cid=1454919593&ei=9DbfSuiSJovqlQTAobyGAw&rt=SEARCH&vm=STANDARD&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.voanews.com%2Fenglish%2F2009-10-20-voa56.cfm
Keyword: Beheading

Mexico’s Drug War: 10 headless bodies found in Guerrero[2 with heads found in Acapulco]
Fri Oct 16 18:31:11 2009

3 heads found along Mexican highway
Thu Sep 24 16:40:44 2009 ·

9 killed in 9 hours in Ciudad Juarez
Wed Sep 23

Juarez: Running the Most Dangerous City in the Americas
Mexican gang violence kills 21

Mexico Police Chief’s Head Found in Ice Box

12 decapitated bodies found in Mexico

...and on and on....coming soon to your hometown!


18 posted on 10/21/2009 9:31:28 AM PDT by AuntB (If the TALIBAN grew drugs & burned our land instead of armed Mexican Cartels would anyone notice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia
What we should learn from them: once these socialist institutions, such as National Health, are established, it is impossible to root them out.

Difficult, but not impossible. Most of those socialist institutions, in the core sense of the state ownership of the means of production, distribution and exchange, were indeed abolished in Britain by the mass privatisations of the Thatcher government: subsequently continued and extended under Major and even Blair. Out went public ownership of coal, steel, water, electricity, gas, telecoms, rail and a good deal more.

19 posted on 10/21/2009 10:38:39 AM PDT by Winniesboy (61 years a NHS patient; 7 years a Freeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Winniesboy

There is a difference between selling off an asset and dismantling a service-provider that provides “free” service.


20 posted on 10/21/2009 10:54:48 AM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

Indeed. But the cases I have described were, nonetheless, socialist institutions, and they have indeed been abolished - with no attempt by the Blair/Brown Labour governments to restore them.


21 posted on 10/21/2009 12:40:02 PM PDT by Winniesboy (61 years a NHS patient; 7 years a Freeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: benjibrowder

Yup.


22 posted on 10/21/2009 3:33:22 PM PDT by cvq3842 (A fool and his liberty are soon parted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson