Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Examiner Bio 'Cold, dead hands': A promise, not a slogan
St. Louis Gun Right Examiner ^ | October 19, 2009 | Kurt Hofmann

Posted on 10/19/2009 4:45:07 PM PDT by Still Thinking

When Charlton Heston held up a replica Revolutionary War musket, and said "From my cold, dead hands," at the NRA Convention in 2000, he was not the first to use those words in that context, but his use is certainly the most famous. It was a powerful speech that Heston gave, delivered with both the solemnity and the fire one would expect from one of the few actors capable of pulling off the role of Moses.

Much has changed since that speech, including the now much more politically correct NRA. Can anyone imagine the top of the NRA hierarchy now promising to fight to the death against any attempt to disarm the citizenry? How could they? With a mantra of "enforce the laws on the books" what happens when a law calling for confiscation of some type of firearm goes "on the books"? No--today's NRA is much too concerned with appearing "reasonable" to say anything so confrontational (although they're not averse to making a buck from it).

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: appeasement; banglist; heston; nra
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-56 next last
I love this guy. No mealy mouthing. Remember to go to the source link. You can read the full article and the author gets paid by page views.
1 posted on 10/19/2009 4:45:08 PM PDT by Still Thinking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

AM, could you please remove “Examiner Bio” from the title. Cut and paste glitch. Thanks.


2 posted on 10/19/2009 4:50:40 PM PDT by Still Thinking (If ignorance is bliss, liberals must be ecstatic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

NRA = Not Really American. The NRA has said time and tiem again that they are for the “hunting purposes of firearms”.


3 posted on 10/19/2009 4:51:21 PM PDT by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

I dont own a gun but listening to Heston and watching this Obamanation sweeping the country I have to get myself one.

Been thinking about a 20 gauge shotgun and a rifle of sometype. The 20 gauge so my wife can fire it easily.

I refuse to idly sit back and watch the destruction of the Constitution.


4 posted on 10/19/2009 4:55:34 PM PDT by Gurgi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

So am I.


5 posted on 10/19/2009 4:55:40 PM PDT by Still Thinking (If ignorance is bliss, liberals must be ecstatic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

“You can read the full article and the author gets paid by page views.”

Does he have a prominent link to FR on his BLOG??


6 posted on 10/19/2009 4:57:50 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (FR.....Monthly Donors Wanted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

Nope. But we’re better off since he takes the time to write what he does. Seeing he gets a little ad revenue (I have no idea what they get paid per hit) seems a small price to pay.


7 posted on 10/19/2009 4:59:28 PM PDT by Still Thinking (If ignorance is bliss, liberals must be ecstatic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

And he’s not using content we generated, we’re using his.


8 posted on 10/19/2009 4:59:55 PM PDT by Still Thinking (If ignorance is bliss, liberals must be ecstatic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking
From the article:

Nelson T. “Pete” Shields, president of Handgun Control, Inc.: The problem is to slow down the increasing number of handguns sold in this country. The second problem is to get them all registered. And the final problem is to make the possession of all handguns and all handgun ammunition — except for the military, policemen, licensed security guards, licensed sporting clubs, and licensed gun collectors — totally illegal.

Everyone note how they plan to incrementally disarm the law-abiding.

Good article

9 posted on 10/19/2009 5:03:21 PM PDT by GYL2 (Always mystify, mislead and surprise the enemy Thomas J. (Stonewall) Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

“And he’s not using content we generated, we’re using his.”

We’re not “using” sh*%...

You’re holding out his tin cup for him while we try to raise enough money here to keep the lights on.

No, thanks.


10 posted on 10/19/2009 5:04:12 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (FR.....Monthly Donors Wanted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking; All

The leftist media and politicians are scared to death of the NRA. Those lawsuits cost the NRA millions. There have been a half dozen lawsuits based on Heller with the Second Amendment Foundation.

Anyone remember Morton Grove? There is no longer a gun ban in that city because of the NRA.

Remember the Katrina victims? The NRA and the SAF sued.

goa = AWOL The goa still hasn’t lifted a finger for any progun legislation or lawsuits on their own.


11 posted on 10/19/2009 5:04:40 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (NRA /Patron - TSRA- IDPA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gurgi
Been thinking about a 20 gauge shotgun and a rifle of sometype. The 20 gauge so my wife can fire it easily.

So do it already. Time's a-wasting.

12 posted on 10/19/2009 5:06:11 PM PDT by Charles Martel ("Endeavor to persevere...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

FR isn’t funded by clicks, it’s funded by US! If some Freeper has already contributed this quarter, what’s the big deal if they also click on over to this guy’s page so he can get something for what he did. It doesn’t actually cost them anything. You don’t want to read the whole article, don’t click. Sheesh.


13 posted on 10/19/2009 5:07:13 PM PDT by Still Thinking (If ignorance is bliss, liberals must be ecstatic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5

Yes, the NRA has been doing better of late, probably because of criticism like this. There’s still a lot of their past decisions that are awfully hard to accept, but I do give credit where due.


14 posted on 10/19/2009 5:12:54 PM PDT by Still Thinking (If ignorance is bliss, liberals must be ecstatic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

Don’t pawn off BLOGS as News/Activism and then beg for hits.

Post the article in the proper forum and let it stand on its own.

Sheesh....


15 posted on 10/19/2009 5:18:04 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (FR.....Monthly Donors Wanted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

Please provide the direct quote, the source and the venue (magazine, paper, official statement), please. I’d be very interested to see proof of this statement made by the NRA time and time again.


16 posted on 10/19/2009 5:21:14 PM PDT by ExpatGator (Extending logic since 1961.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

Fair enough. And BTW I’m not “begging for hits”. It’s information I thought had value and deserved wider exposure, which is why I posted it here. Again, because I thought it had value, I thought it would be fair for people to read the article at the author’s site, so he can be compensated and so it will be worthwhile to him to continue to post commentary I find worthwhile.

Now you may have a point about it being opinion as opposed to news, especially WRT this particular article, so posting in Blogs might make sense. I’m just in the habit of posting in News/Activism, so I tend to hit that button first (and you’ll have to admit, “Activism” is relevant to the article).


17 posted on 10/19/2009 5:23:01 PM PDT by Still Thinking (If ignorance is bliss, liberals must be ecstatic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

Nice article - thanks for posting. Hard to believe this came from Seattle!

I made the mistake of thinking it was “the right thing to do” to join this organization about a year ago. What an education. I get tons of junk mail, each piece wanting my money, but far worse I get calls every few weeks at my unregistered number at home.

Each time, I listen to the guy start in on his rant about some new legislation and how Mr. LaPierre needs my help, i.e. $, to combat this latest threat to our freedoms. It’s a different legislative threat each time, a brand new hole in the dike that must be plugged with an expensive new finger each time. What a waste of time, money and effort. It’s not the proper strategy to employ against a determined oppressor. I usually just hang up now after increasingly shorter time spans.

I’ve been meaning to write a letter to this joker and ask, in exchange for any further support from me, if he would be so kind as to issue a line-in-the-sand statement on our behalf to the government, outlining the final-straw legislative attempt it would take for him to encourage his membership to exercise the original purpose of the Second Amendment.

I doubt he would.


18 posted on 10/19/2009 5:27:43 PM PDT by dagogo redux (A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dagogo redux

Thanks. It’s actually St. Louis, although there’s a guy in Seattle that writes about gun rights issues for Examiner.com as well.


19 posted on 10/19/2009 5:32:46 PM PDT by Still Thinking (If ignorance is bliss, liberals must be ecstatic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Gurgi
Good luck with ammo.

Still lots of 20-gauge. Lots of trouble and pretty expensive to find any caliber of rifle or handgun ammo I actually shoot.

Likewise, reloading supplies.

20 posted on 10/19/2009 7:35:40 PM PDT by elkfersupper (Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking
So am I.

Me too.

The NRA might misidentify the quarry.

21 posted on 10/19/2009 7:38:52 PM PDT by elkfersupper (Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

;-)


22 posted on 10/19/2009 8:55:41 PM PDT by Still Thinking (If ignorance is bliss, liberals must be ecstatic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

“Don’t pawn off BLOGS as News/Activism and then beg for hits.

Post the article in the proper forum and let it stand on its own.

Sheesh....”

Is that a rule on FR, or are you just bossy? Lighten up. Seems so trivial.

BTW, like your screen name.


23 posted on 10/19/2009 10:06:10 PM PDT by Blue Collar Christian (><BCC>NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking
"I love this guy."

How quaint, another circular firing squad with the NRA in the middle. That's an original article that I've never read before.[/sarcasm] Let me tell you something, the NRA has done far more to protect our natural right of self defense than any other organization that I know of. Far more than this blathering dupe.
24 posted on 10/20/2009 4:37:02 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dagogo redux
"I get tons of junk mail, each piece wanting my money, but far worse I get calls every few weeks at my unregistered number at home."

Don't know what you did, but I've been an NRA member for a long time and I never get calls from them. I get their mailings. Some of the things I'm interested in and have gotten deals off of. I appreciate that. Other things, I just throw in the trash. It seems a small sacrifice for an organization that is out there every day in the halls of federal and state congresses across the land fighting for our right of self defense.

If the GOA was the only national organization out there, we would have most likely lost our rights years ago.
25 posted on 10/20/2009 4:40:40 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden; Shooter 2.5
--a pat on the back for some of the sensible posts on this thread--

--too many of the ignorant out there don't seem to realize that the NRA has to deal with the real world of Washington, DC (and the California and New York state legislatures,either of which could have the entire budget of the NRA expended on them with little results), not some fantasy land where sturdy yoemen armed with 03A3's, SMLE's and Moisin-Nagants stop UN-sponsored Bulgaro-Peruvian tank columns advancing toward the Mississippi River--

26 posted on 10/20/2009 5:30:51 AM PDT by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the MSM tells you about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank
"not some fantasy land where sturdy yoemen armed with 03A3's, SMLE's and Moisin-Nagants stop UN-sponsored Bulgaro-Peruvian tank columns advancing toward the Mississippi River-- "

Did you see the guys picture from the blog? Red berret and it looks like a camo top. He looks like someone who has watched Red Dawn too many times.
27 posted on 10/20/2009 5:36:15 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
NRA = Not Really American. The NRA has said time and tiem again that they are for the “hunting purposes of firearms”.

BS. Back that up with a source or reference, or be know to all here as a liar.

Let me guess, your a GOA member.

28 posted on 10/20/2009 6:24:45 AM PDT by Jotmo (Has 0bama fixed my soul yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jotmo

“or be know to all here as a liar.”

Wow, you’re such an authroity. Second, you’re not that important. Go do your own research.


29 posted on 10/20/2009 6:56:24 AM PDT by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

I politely requested supporting evidence for your claim in post 16. Be a good Freeper and please supply proof.


30 posted on 10/20/2009 7:12:57 AM PDT by ExpatGator (Extending logic since 1961.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

From his bio:

A former paratrooper, Kurt Hofmann was paralyzed in a car accident in 2002. The helplessness inherent to confinement to a wheelchair prompted him to explore armed self-defense, only to discover that Illinois denies that right, inspiring him to become active in gun rights advocacy. He writes a gun rights blog, called Armed and Safe.


31 posted on 10/20/2009 7:29:20 AM PDT by Cheeks (http://www.appleseedinfo.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ExpatGator

“Be a good Freeper and please supply proof.”

Why don’t you drama queens go search google for “NRA hunting purposes” and have a good time, and try to keep up with the rest of society. Next thing you know you’ll be wanting us to explain what a liberal is.


32 posted on 10/20/2009 7:42:44 AM PDT by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5
The leftist media and politicians are scared to death of the NRA. Those lawsuits cost the NRA millions. There have been a half dozen lawsuits based on Heller with the Second Amendment Foundation.

Let's not forget NRA's support for concealed-carry, and it's role in the greatly-increased number of states that have "shall-issue" CCW.

33 posted on 10/20/2009 7:59:09 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Public healthcare looks like it will work as well as public housing did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cheeks
"Kurt Hofmann was paralyzed in a car accident in 2002"

Okay, you made me feel like a schlub for raking on him. However, the NRA is the premier organization out there defending our natural right of self defense. It's done far more for him and all of us than any other organization in regards to this and we should all be supporting it with our money.

Sure, they're not perfect but name one organization that is? I wish they supported our rights to own fully auto rifles, but they don't. Who knows, maybe over time they will. Name another organization that can pressure lawmakers at the state and federal level better and get things done? There's no lawmaker out there shivering in their boots worried about their GOA rating. But there are plenty out there worried about their NRA rating.
34 posted on 10/20/2009 8:04:24 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Cheeks

I’ll give you a perfect example of how effective the NRA is. Earlier this year there was a bill that was going to be put forth to give DC statehood. An Amendment was going to be attached to it to gut DC’s idiotic gun laws. The Bill never made it to the house floor because it was let known that if you voted against that amendment it would affect your NRA rating. This ensured that the bill never made it to the floor and was killed in committee.

Basically, the NRA saved us from the unconstitutionality of DC getting full representation in the Congress. Name another 2nd amendment organization that has that clout?


35 posted on 10/20/2009 8:16:13 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
The GOA has stated repeatedly that they are a liberal front organization who's main purpose is to undermine support for the NRA, siphon off members and diminish our 2A rights.

Please don't expect me to source that, go do your own research. If you can't prove me wrong, then based on your own rules, we all should take it as fact.

36 posted on 10/20/2009 8:17:00 AM PDT by Jotmo (Has 0bama fixed my soul yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

“Let’s not forget NRA’s support for concealed-carry”

The NRA was completely absent here in Colorado when we were fighting for our CCW. Which States are you referring to that the NRA gave CCW support?


37 posted on 10/20/2009 8:28:21 AM PDT by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Jotmo

NRA supported the McCarthy/Dingell bill, now known as NICS. That, alone, dooms the NRA in my book. The NRA stomped on personal rights.

The NRA went further and wrote and backed HR2640 to restrict veterans with any mental problems coming back from the war to also be denied firearms purchasing rights via the NICS system.

The NRA pushed for Project Exile in cooperation with the Brady Bunch. Project Exile started in Richmond, Virginia, in 1997, and moved prosecution of gun offenses to federal court rather than in state court where they belong. The NRA stomped on State’s rights.

Charlton Heston, the NRA’s poster boy, was the original pusher of the 1968 Gun Control Act. Yep, before he joined forces with the NRA he was a major pusher against gun ownership. So, before you get all teary eyed and turned on by seeing his “From my cold dead hands” photo, just remember, he single handedly took many of your rights from your hands.

The NRA backed off Eric Holder and Sonia Sotomayor. The NRA got mouthy during the Obama campaign and gave hope they might actually grow a pair, but then they backed off completely on Obama anti-firearm nominees.

Let’s face it, the NRA NEEDS these liberals, because without them what would be scaring you into donating to the NRA?


38 posted on 10/20/2009 8:30:35 AM PDT by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad; PapaBear3625
PB3625>“Let’s not forget NRA’s support for concealed-carry”

The NRA was completely absent here in Colorado
when we were fighting for our CCW.
Which States are you referring to that the NRA gave CCW support?

You are extremely ignorant of the CCW fight in Colorado.

Or you are repeating the talking points of the RMGOA.

The Colorado Shooting Sports Association, state affiliate
of the NRA lead the fight.

You might want to ask Tony Fabian, president of CSSA, what took place.

Or ask Ken Chlouber, a Republican state senator from Leadville.
or Doug Lamborn, my Congressman or David Schultheis

I and hundreds of others signed a copy
of the bill at the Denver FoNRA
dinner for Ken Chlouber.


39 posted on 10/20/2009 9:00:14 AM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: UriĀ’el-2012

” state affiliate
of the NRA lead the fight.”

The CSSA stood tall but just because they are an NRA affiliate does not mean the NRA gets the credit. Weak, damned weak.


40 posted on 10/20/2009 9:12:06 AM PDT by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: UriĀ’el-2012

So, tell us, what EXACTLY did the NRA do for the CCW issue in Colorado? We know what the CSSA did, tell us what the NRA did to earn their money.


41 posted on 10/20/2009 9:14:24 AM PDT by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
First, as the NRA state association, CSSA is the sanctioning body of all official NRA firearms matches in Colorado.

Additionally, CSSA is the chief state pro-gun lobbying force at the capitol. Since 1999, CSSA has been instrumental in defeating every anti-gun bill introduced at the General Assembly, and has worked to get pro-gun legislation like modifying the law pertaining to carrying firearms in your vehicle and pre-empting Denver’s “stop and confiscate” ordinance in 2000. CSSA and its members played a major role in finally passing meaningful uniform concealed handgun permit legislation in 2003, making Colorado the 33rd “shall-issue” state in the U.S.
Tony Fabian President, CSSA state affiliate of the NRA

NRA-ILA CHIEF CAUTIONS AGAINST INTERNET MISINFORMATION

42 posted on 10/20/2009 9:36:49 AM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5

Katrina victims got rusted clubs back.


43 posted on 10/20/2009 10:37:36 AM PDT by wastedyears (Clyde Shelton is my hero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
"NRA supported the McCarthy/Dingell bill, now known as NICS. That, alone, dooms the NRA in my book. The NRA stomped on personal rights.

The NRA went further and wrote and backed HR2640 to restrict veterans with any mental problems coming back from the war to also be denied firearms purchasing rights via the NICS system."


You better check your facts. The NICS was not put into place by the McCarthy/Dingell bill (passed in 2007), but by the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act of 1993. The NRA was against that and fought it and at least got it so that NICS is an instant check system, not the original 5 day waiting period. For more, read here: http://www.answers.com/topic/brady-handgun-violence-prevention-act

HR2640 actually allows returning military who have been diagnosed with post traumatic stress disorder to be taken out of the NICS as being banned from owning guns. It does nothing to add more people to the NICS system, but streamlines the process for people to adjudicate and get their record clean so they can own guns. For more, read here: http://www.nraila.org/Issues/FactSheets/Read.aspx?id=219&issue=018#

As for the rest of your chirpings, I'm not an expert on what Chuck Heston did during the 1968 Gun Control Act, but based on your massive errors in the first two instances, you are playing very loose with your facts and are not to be believed without proper sourcing.
44 posted on 10/20/2009 10:38:16 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

Oh, one more thing I forgot to mention in my other post, HR2640 is the McCarthy/Dingell bill...


45 posted on 10/20/2009 10:40:37 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

So why has the NRA made concessions at every step of the way? Why couldn’t they have just said “no” from the beginning? We could still be purchasing new full autos at this time.


46 posted on 10/20/2009 10:40:53 AM PDT by wastedyears (Clyde Shelton is my hero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden
Did you see the guys picture from the blog? Red berret and it looks like a camo top. He looks like someone who has watched Red Dawn too many times.

What's the big deal? These guys wear berets too.


47 posted on 10/20/2009 10:43:11 AM PDT by wastedyears (Clyde Shelton is my hero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears
"So why has the NRA made concessions at every step of the way? Why couldn’t they have just said “no” from the beginning? We could still be purchasing new full autos at this time."

I'm not sure what you are referring to specifically here, but I will say one thing in general. We didn't lose our gun rights in one sweeping bill or law. It was incremental. If we are to get back the ones we have lost, it will be the same way, incrementally. The GOA is an organization that wants the whole ball of wax all at once. Yet, how much have they actually done for our rights? Answer, nada, zip...
48 posted on 10/20/2009 10:45:04 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

When did I make mention of the GOA?


49 posted on 10/20/2009 10:51:12 AM PDT by wastedyears (Clyde Shelton is my hero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears
"When did I make mention of the GOA?"

You never did. I was just using them as an example of a gun rights group that has goals that may not be reachable at this point and they do not ever "compromise" on those goals to get something done in the near term. The result being that they never achieve anything, other than bashing the NRA.
50 posted on 10/20/2009 11:10:08 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson