Posted on 10/19/2009 12:56:25 PM PDT by jazusamo
The House and Senate Armed Services Committees have taken a small but significant step to eliminate well, almost one of the most outrageous congressional behaviors in defense legislation.
For years, these committees have raided the Pentagons critical Operation and Maintenance accounts to offset the cost of earmarks (pork) they add to their bills.
A major part of the O&M budget pays for training, weapons maintenance, food, fuel, spare parts, and all the other things troops need when they go to war. Even though O&M spending is the budgetary embodiment of Support Our Troops, and even though research on these raids has been around for years, no one paid the slightest attention and the appalling behavior continued.
For example, the House and Senate Armed Services Committees added over 900 earmarks altogether to their defense bills. The House committee added 502 earmarks, and the Senate committee added 426. To help offset their cost, the House committee reduced O&M by $1.9 billion; the Senate committee raided O&M by $2.0 billion.
Then, the press started paying attention to research (reported at Military.com, the Huffington Post, and the website of the Straus Military Reform Project) about all this. The Washington Post and Congressional Quarterly made references to the behavior. The matter was brought up by Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) and a few others in the debates in the Senate on this years defense bills, and then the Washington Times ran a front page story about the issue.
The jig was up. Under the emerging public glare, the House and Senate Armed Services Committees cleaned up their act. In the final version of their 2010 bill the conference report they dropped the various phony pretexts they had used to cut O&M spending. Gone were civilian under-execution (pretending DoD wasnt hiring civilians when it was actually hiring more: cut over $500 million), fuel cost reductions (pretending worldwide fuel prices would decline by a known amount: cut over $200 million), and unobligated balances (declaring money DoD had not yet spent to be forever excess: cut hundreds and hundreds of $millions). These and the other gimmicks were (almost) all gone. Just a, relatively speaking, small $100 million reduction for those yet-to-be-obligated unobligated balances remained.
Thats the good news.
They did end up reducing the Presidents request for O&M. Obama asked for $156.4 billion; they cut that by $264 million. Anyone paying the slightest attention knows each of the military services need major increases for training and maintenance.
They also did not take their pork out of the bill. The conference report lists about 900 House and Senate earmarks. There was no meaningful effort to reduce them. The Armed Services Committees simply shifted the burden of paying for most of them to other accounts.
It is also very important to note that little else changed. These committees still have our defenses on the same course they have been on for decades. That is not a good thing; our forces have been growing smaller, older, and less ready to fight at increasing overall cost for decades. The increasing dollar bloat continues to buy a weaker force.
The worst news is that even though the Armed Services Committees may have taken a small, constructive step, it may amount to nothing.
Those committees dont control the money. The appropriations committees do. The authorization bill from the House and Senate Armed Services Committees is a policy bill that only recommends funding levels. Most people dont know it, but their dollar figures are purely advisory.
To whom does this advice go? In the House, it goes to the Ultra-Porker, John Murtha (D-Penn), chairman of the House Appropriations defense subcommittee. Murtha, of course is the subject of much reporting questioning his ethics and actions. Many defense watchers will not be surprised to see him indicted in the not too distant future. In the Senate, the appropriators are led by Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii) whose typically gentlemanly behavior coexists with some of the most voracious porking for Hawaii that I have seen in more than 30 years on Capitol Hill.
The House and Senate Appropriations Committee are now in conference resolving the differences in their bills, each of which raided O&M for billions of dollars. The Armed Services Committees have laid out a different path for themselves: Make the pork, not O&M, pay for itself. It is a small step, but it is very much worth taking if you have any decency. It will be interesting to see what the appropriators do. We should all pay attention.
Winslow Wheeler is director of the Straus Military Reform Project of the Center for Defense Information in Washington.
ping

Good Post, Jaz! :)
Monday, October 19, 2009
Burying the Lead: Murtha Challenger Raises Big Money [Kevin D. Williamson]
From the Bucks County Courier Times:
Only one House candidate in Pennsylvania has raised more money than [Patrick] Murphy: 12th District Republican William Russell, running against John Murtha, has accumulated $2 million.
Jaz, you were on to this scam last week, so you’ll appreciate this story...
Great news, Smooth, Bill’s bringing in the bucks.
I hope this and the possibility of indictments is playing on Fat Jack’s mind, he deserves to stay awake some nights for the taxpayer dollars he’s absconded with over the years not only for himself but for his corrupt cronies.
With all the publicity he’s gotten since January for his pork filled earmarks and ties to corruption all his fat cat friends might not come through for him with the money they did at the last minute in his last election.
This could very well be the last election for Fat Jack!
I love that subpoena pic you posted. :-)
Great story. Really glad to see someone picking up on the fact KDH is neighbor of Murtha. It’d be nice to see the awarding of that contract investigated and have it pointed out that Murtha and the Kuchera Bros are personal friends and that they’ve raised hundreds of thousands of dollars for Murtha.
Its also a little strange that they wanted lighter vests and even though KDH got the contract the Eagle plate carrier was 1.5 lbs lighter.When things like that happen it makes the whole process suspect, especially with Murtha, his brother and/or cronies he formally employed being buddies of the contractor getting the bid.
I like to think his puckering string gets a little tighter every time another fact comes out in stories like these.
LOL! Good depiction of Fat Jack, he looks right at home in his little ‘business’ corner of the House.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.