Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran Could Reject Western Terms for Uranium Deal
Nuclear Threat Initiative ^ | 10/19/09 | Staff

Posted on 10/19/2009 11:15:41 AM PDT by OldDeckHand

Iran would not agree in multilateral talks this week to ship a portion of its low-enriched uranium stockpile to other countries for further refinement, but would instead seek to purchase more highly enriched material from abroad for use in a Tehran research reactor, state media quoted anonymous officials as saying (see GSN, Oct. 16).

If Iran balks at the understanding, reached earlier this month in talks with the five permanent U.N. Security Council member nations and Germany, the nation could eliminate the possibility of a compromise with Western powers aimed at creating additional time for negotiations over its disputed nuclear activities, according to the Associated Press (see GSN, Oct. 2). The United States and its allies have for years expressed concern that Iran's uranium enrichment program could produce nuclear-weapon material; Iran insists the effort is strictly peaceful in nature.

Still, Iran had not formally ruled out such an agreement ahead of today's meeting with delegates from France, Russia and the United States, said a high-level Western diplomat in Vienna connected to the negotiations (George Jahn, Associated Press/Yahoo!News, Oct. 19).

(Excerpt) Read more at globalsecuritynewswire.org ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nuclear; obama; weapons; wmd
First, NTI is a liberal think tank founded by Ted Turner and Sam Nunn. If they're saying that Iran may give the US the big middle finger with respect to Uranium reprocessing, you can believe it's close to a "sure thing".

Obama gave up the eastern European missile shield, and Russian gave him Zero in return. So much for "smart power".

1 posted on 10/19/2009 11:15:41 AM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

got to wonder how long Israel is going to play this “game”

IMO Bibi and Co. approached Obama and said “we’ll give this diplomacy thing one more try”. Obama then outed the undisclosed Iranian nuke facilities ahead of the Oct 1st Vienna meeting to pressure the Iranians. Many thought we could have sometype of agreement enriching Iranian uranium abroad and now that looks like it will not happen . . .


2 posted on 10/19/2009 11:26:19 AM PDT by jhpigott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Well said. Obama will join the UN soon in writing a mean mean nasty letter to Iran. hans blix


3 posted on 10/19/2009 11:28:04 AM PDT by NoObamaFightForConservatives
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jhpigott
"Many thought we could have sometype of agreement enriching Iranian uranium abroad and now that looks like it will not happen . . ."

What really yanks my chain, is that next to our Afghanistan policy and NK arms proliferation, this Iranian deal (or non-deal) is our single most important foreign policy problem. But, instead of talking about this, we're talking boys in balloons, Obama's war with FNC and who the Republican nominee might be in three more years.

In fact, I didn't see these talks mentioned one time on the Sunday morning news shows. Nor did I see any commentary about Russia's refusal to push for more sanctions, despite getting exactly wanted they wanted from Obama on the missile shield.

Our foreign policy, at every level, is a joke.

4 posted on 10/19/2009 11:38:45 AM PDT by OldDeckHand (No Socialized Medicine, No Way, No How, No Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

It’s hard to believe what passes for “news” these days. FWIW, I’m right there with you - this WAS the story of the weekend.

If the Vienna talks fall through, as it looks like they may, and if the Russians refuse to get on board with sanctions thereafter (which, again, looks like the case b/c of the amatuers in the Obama admin.) my $$ is on Israel taking matters into its own hands.

If all of the above comes to pass, we will wish we had paid more attention to this story (the REAL NEWS) b/c the Middle East would go from worse to catastophic (forget “bad to worse”)


5 posted on 10/19/2009 12:24:43 PM PDT by jhpigott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
When the Russians told Hillary, to her face, to get stuffed on Iran last week in Moscow, that was the signal for the Iranians to blow off 0 this week. They'd already backtracked on allowing inspections of the Qom facility, and now it looks like the uranium enrichment deal is off.

0’s foreign policy makes me laugh in a bitter sardonic way. The 0 White House always seems to think that they have some sort of deal, only to be humiliated and exposed as inept, naive fools when their supposed partners very publicly renege on whatever vague half-promises have been made.

6 posted on 10/19/2009 12:50:48 PM PDT by mojito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
Iran would not agree in multilateral talks this week to ship a portion of its low-enriched uranium stockpile to other countries for further refinement, but would instead seek to purchase more highly enriched material from abroad for use in a Tehran research reactor, state media quoted anonymous officials as saying. If Iran balks at the understanding, reached earlier this month in talks with the five permanent U.N. Security Council member nations and Germany, the nation could eliminate the possibility of a compromise with Western powers aimed at creating additional time for negotiations over its disputed nuclear activities, according to the Associated Press...
Gosh, it's almost as if Iran doesn't *want* to compromise.
7 posted on 10/19/2009 2:49:30 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

8 posted on 10/19/2009 4:55:56 PM PDT by SJackson (In wine there is wisdom, In beer there is freedom, In water there is bacteria.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Wow! Who could have seen THIS coming?


9 posted on 10/19/2009 8:33:10 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows ("When France chides you for appeasement, you know you're scraping bottom." --Charles Krauthammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

I’m SHOCKED, I tell ya!


10 posted on 10/19/2009 8:33:50 PM PDT by Allegra (It doesn't matter what this tagline says...the liberals are going to call it "racist.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson