Posted on 10/16/2009 8:16:06 AM PDT by GilGil
While I found the clip in a post at http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/, I posted the clip url of Frank because it is amazing to listen to. Barney Frank clearly states that "natural born" should not be a requirement to be president.
There you have a glimpse into the Democrat's thinking.They certified Obama with the idea that they would argue the constitutional requirement for "natural born" which is that he should be born in the US and that his parents should also is no longer applicable.
Now, why of all things would little Barney bring that up? Is he a truther? We already know he is a tea bagger.
“Barney Frank clearly states....”
With THAT lisp??
May Bawney Fwank spend eternity with 1000 horny likenesses of Helen Thomas.
Because Barney Frank is so much smarter than the founding fathers.
So instead of amending the Constitution, they’ll just ignore it.
The party of “should”.
What does Barney know about being “naturally born”?
Sigh. It’s just so much easier that way.
Just another “inconvenient” provision in the Constitution Bawney Fwank wishes to ignore.
We already knew how they felt about the Constitution.
In 2012, t looks bad for Obama because his primary challengers are Nelson Mandela, Gorbachev and the polling leader Kim Jong Il.
Barney Frank is just another creepy perv who thinks he is smarter than our Founding Fathers.
Sorry Barney, but it ALREADY IS!!!!!!!!!!!
ALL leftists think they, being alive in the here and now, have more information, wisdom, and intelligence than anyone who has ever lived before.
Well, a turd isn’t “natural born” Barney, so that rules you out.
Wow... who died and left HIM in charge? Maybe he can rewrite every American’s ‘contract’ with the law when EACH AND EVERY ONE OF US DECIDES THE RULES ARE NOT FOR US EITHER!!!!!
I can just see myself standing in front of a judge explaining why I do not PERSONALLY have to pay taxes, obey traffic laws, etc. ..... How will that work?
Well whether Barney likes it or not;the constitution says that the President Electee must be natural born.If Frank doesn’t like it he can pass an Amendmant to the Constitution.
Untill that time he can shut the hell up and follow the law.Something he has a big problem doing.
Barney Frank has to be the most disgusting person I can think of.
Disgusting to look at.
Disgusting to listen to.
Just totally Disgusting!
Yep. It is one of liberalism’s greatest weaknesses.
I believe “hubris” might be the correct term.
You are evil!
This does mean one thing: those “crazy” birthers are right.
Barney Frank clearly states that “natural born” should not be a requirement to be president.
Tuff Sh_t, Bawney. The Constitution says otherwise. Your OPINION is not law.
Now that is truly hell.
That's the problem with Congress generally ... Cong. Jones or Sen. Smith proposes some bill which is purported to solve all the problems of the universe. Debate ensues: whether it's a good idea, whether it will do any or all of what it's supposed to do, what it will cost, etc.
Nobody EVER asks "do we even have the authority to do this?"
By that defintion Bobby Jindal isn't a natural born citizen either. Maybe Franks is trying to set things up for him?
Astonishingly, Obama signed onto the senate resolution yet he cannot fit what Leahy stated and still the democrap party put Obama up for their nominee because of his racial leverage.
Democrats do not have any reverence for the Constitution, it is an impediment, or was, before they abrogated the contract as they build the federal oligarchical rule in America.
Good point. The Constitution is the foundation of our entire legal system. If they invalidate the Constitution then there are no laws that are enforcable. Except on us.
If only there was some way to turn what one Congressman thought should be in the Constitution into an actual part of the Constitution. No, wait, he can by getting 2/3 of the House, 2/3 of the Senate and 3/4 of the states tov ote to change it.
As I understand it, neither Soetoro nor Jindal are eligible to be POTUS, based on the fact that one or both parents were not citizens of the US. Not that Congress or the SCOTUS would do anything to prevent it.
It’s an amazing audi clip. Thanks for posting.
I tried to go to your website:
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com
to learn more.
My effort was blocked by my anti-viral software, “Trend Micro Internet Security.” What’s up with that?
But they thought it was appropriate when they challenged John McCain during the primaries.
Covering for Obama?
Now that is a fitting punishment for Barney and for balloon boy’s dad.
Just as in the recent elections over the past couple of cycles, there's so many Obamabots, blacks, illegals, dead, etc. that vote Democrat that would NEVER allow a rule like those found in the U.S. Constitution to stand....after all; in THEIR minds, it's a "Living Document", that should be brought up the their Liberal-taught mental midgetry that believes in "feedom of expression" and "freedom of lifestyle".
I don’t know. People are saying this is a problem but I never have such a problem. I use Mcafee as a virus protection. There is no problem whatsoever with this site.
As you were supposed to learn in school, turd face, all you gotta do is amend the constitution, traitor queer.
I am waiting for the first GI to step forward and refuse to deploy on “O’s” orders... challenging the ‘President’s’ authority to command ANY military personnel.
A properly vetted CIC goes through incredible soul-searching and gut-wrenching trauma (if he’s worth a da&^) in sending young people out to bleed or die for us ... how THIS ‘President’ does it is beyond me!! I am truly surprised that some trooper has not yet challenged the ‘President’s’ fitness to command.
I don't take legal or moral advice from a treasonous Communist faggot.
Sorry, it's just a rule I have.

This says, to me, that BO is not natural born.
Best response that Dems have to any argument is "Who cares?".
No, he doesn’t “clearly state” that, that IS what his words mean, but your title is wrong, and so is your summary.
He clearly states that he “believes in the right of the people to choose as they wish”,
later he says...
Americans should be able to able “to elect as President of the United States someone they wish”. (it ends there)
Please clarify your titles, even if it means using parenthesis and adding a clarifyer, such as...(My Title)..or..(My Words)
These are the types of titles that the KOS kiddies and DUmmies have a field day with, and sometimes we see it repeated on msnbcnn, etc., making FR look like One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest.
Thank you, I now return you to your regularly scheduled slaying of the left.LOL
Thanks. I just went to the site. It looks fine to me.
Barney Frank clearly states that “natural born” should not be a requirement to be president.
Apparently neither are brains a requirement to be the congressional homo for the Fourth District of Massachusetts.
Of course, Barney Frank says that. Barney is all about “unnatural.”
Orly’s websites are under constant attack by the anti-American, extremist, haters...the DNC and their Army of the Stupid. They are constantly reporting that they have picked up a virus and/or malware by visiting them. They have even been able to cause an infection of her sites, which then verifies that the site are or have been malicious.
If you have good protection, just continue on to the site, if in doubt, try the cached version, or the Internet Archive.
Barney was UN-naturally born (or born UN-natural, take your pick).
That is a perfectly valid opinion regardless of who proffers the opinion.
The issue comes down to how one goes about furthering their opinion. A Representative can propose an amendment to remove the restriction or just ignore the Constitution. Ignoring the Constitution appears to be the more popular method used by Barney Frank and his colleagues.
It is very similar to the constitutional restriction forbidding residents of Washington D. C. from voting. There are those in Congress who just lobby to ignore the Constitution in lieu of lobbing for an amendment.
I oppose all those who cant find merit in the constitutional process. If the cause is noble why not use the noble process of constitutional amendment?
Sure...why not? Who would know better rather than this POS? Besides, we’re just dining room tables. We don’t need a Constitution...these SOBs do their own thing anyway.
Bawney justifying Kenyans again.
Logical. There is NOTHING natural about Barney Frank.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.