Orly Taitz Gets Joy Behar Very Nervous About the Obama Eligibility Case (Video)

You Tube ^ | 10/14/2009 | Joy Behar Interviews Orly Taitz

[kellynla]

Orly Taitz gets Joy Behar very nervous about the Obama Eligibility case.

[kellynla]

As any combat pilot knows, when you start getting flak you know you're over the target. LOL

Semper Fi,
Kelly

[IrishPennant]

bfl

[DustyMoment]

Orly has some solid evidence growing behind her after some very tough footwork by a lot of dedicated people. She still doesn’t have the smoking gun, zero’s long form BC, but she has accumulated enough other evidence (what an attorney might call circumstantial) that it creates enough smoke to suggest a pretty good fire.

If she was able to make Joy nervous, more power to her. As a screeching, kool-aid drinking, in-the-tank-for-Obama leftist, if Joy is nervous, Orly made her case.

(I didn’t watch the video; just offering opinion) BTW, I didn’t get on Orly’s bandwagon until I looked at some of her evidence online. She’s accumulated some pretty convincing material, IMO.

[SvenMagnussen]

We're going trial on January 26, 2010." - Orly Taitz

[The Sons of Liberty]

I pray it is a fair hearing.

[EmilyGeiger]

bookmark for later.

[steve-b]

Did she also find evidence that Goldman Sachs runs the United States Treasury and that Representative Alcee Hastings and the House of Representatives are planning to build at least six labor camps?

[humblegunner]

Wow! The Taitz lunatic has been practicing coherency.

She's making progress. Not much, but some.

[traderrob6]

I’m afraid Orly is the Arianna Huffington of the right.

[steve-b]

I'm afraid Orly is the Arianna Huffington of the right.

Nah. Arianna Huffington is stupid, but she's not nuts.

[bergmeid]

Did Judge Carter ever come out with a decision? I know dates have been set but I didn’t think he ever made a decision.

[fml]

Jury tampering January 2010

[Mmogamer]

And why is she nuts pray tell?

[ikka]

Look at how the TARP etc. bailouts progressed and tell me GS doesn’t run the US Gov’t. Look at all the people involved, they are all former GS employees.

[kellynla]

“Did Judge Carter ever come out with a decision?”

Decision about what?

[beckysueb]

It might sound crazy now but I believe Obama and the left are very capable of this and that they are just trying to figure out a way to get the American people on board.

[SvenMagnussen]

"We're going to trial January 26, 2010. - Orly Taitz

[steve-b]

They’ve already scheduled her contempt-of-court case for refusing to pay her fine?

[Cringing Negativism Network]

So you’re a follower of comrade Alinsky then?...

[kellynla]

Yea, Orly is “nuts” alright...just too bad that she's got bigger “nuts” than the clowns in Congress, the Gelding Old Party and the rest of the so-called “conservative” talking heads & journalists.

Steve-b, I think they're looking for you over at the DU. LOL

[SvenMagnussen]

Like Obama, Judge Carter is anxious to publish the truth and put this issue to rest.

I’m looking forward to seeing Obama’s complete birth record, passport data and college transcripts so we can all relax and get to work on a bipartisan effort to solve problems and make the world a better place.

[kellynla]

“I’m afraid Orly is the Arianna Huffington of the right.”

Yea, well you’re entitled to be as wrong as the next guy. LOL

I’m taking steak dinner bets on the next hearing...
care to put your money where your mouth is?

[ml/nj]

Does anyone understand why this will be a Jury Trial?

ML/NJ

[Dryman]

“FREE THE LONG FORM!”

[elephant]

You are using sarcasm, right?

[kellynla]

“Wow! The Taitz lunatic has been practicing coherency.
She’s making progress. Not much, but some”

And where did you pass the Bar?

That’s what I thought...another FR “perry mason” wannabee. LOL

[bergmeid]

What I meant was what was the outcome of the court hearing last week. I recall that we were waiting to hear further from him in terms of whether he was going to dismiss the whole thing or let it continue.

[Tax-chick]

Joy Behar is such a blithering dingbat that she’d get nervous debating my 7-year-old.

(This comment does not take a position for or against Orly Taitz and her case.)

[humblegunner]

And where did you pass the Bar?

Probably the same place you did, Clarabelle.

Are you qualified to have an opinion?

Then so am I.

She's a nut.

[traderrob6]

I am not saying she's wrong. What I'm saying from observing her is she appears to be more in love with the notoriety than the cause. MHOO.

[kellynla]

Yea,well anytime you wanna put your money where your mouth is “Clarabelle” you just let me know, missy. LMAO

[kellynla]

I haven’t heard anything yet.

[humblegunner]

What are you talking about?

I should bet that I have an opinion?

Whatever.

[Frantzie]

She is nuts for asking for a BC to provide proof that someone is eligible.

[vikk]

He hasn’t ruled on the Defense Motion to Dismiss yet. She is assuming that the case is going to trial no matter what. It’s not a definite.

[Non-Sequitur]

Yes, well if you want to know what has an IQ of a hundred then the answer is the cast of The View.

[kellynla]

bet on the next hearing, genius...

you're the “expert”... you figure it out. LOL

shezzzzzzzzzz...you FR “perry mason” wannabee clowns come on my threads and post all kinds of idiotic opinions and don't have the stones to back up your claims.

[nikos1121]

I am getting confused, disoriented and combative about this case. Didn’t the judge fine her $20,000 for contempt of court? Am I misinformed here. Someone help.

[Jackson57]

Why is it nuts to actually to SEE the birth certificate of the President of the United States? To me, the fact that Obama is fighting it so adamently makes me suspicious. When I got my Concealed Carry license, I had to show a birth certificate. Is the President of our country any less responsible? It would be so easy to make this go away. To make these people really look nut, just by producing a birth certificate. But, Obama keeps sending his lawyers out to fight it. Isn’t THAT nuts? Either he’s spending someone else’s money to fight it, in which case we need to know who and why? Or he’s spending his own money (highly doubtful) to fight it, in which case THAT’S nuts.

[kellynla]

Nothing is “definite” except “death & taxes” but Judge Carter has set the trial date.

[Jackson57]

Hmmmm ... how have they proven he’s eligible? And if so, why doesn’t he just show it again? Why they fighting so agressively? Simple enough.

[kellynla]

two different judges...and two different cases
Judge Land fined Taitz

[~Kim4VRWC's~]

I admire your ability to keep a sense of humor throughout this mess. ;-)

[Smokeyblue]

Two different cases that Orly brought to court.

One in Georgia with Judge Clay Land. He fined her $20,000.

One in California with Judge Carter. He has not issued a ruling on a motion to dismiss yet.

[Prof. Jorgen]

I am getting confused, disoriented and combative about this case. Didn’t the judge fine her $20,000 for contempt of court? Am I misinformed here. Someone help.

A Judge in Georgia sanctioned her for Rule 11 violations, which is different from contempt of court.
This is regarding a different case in California before a different Judge. I think this case is currently waiting for a ruling on a motion to dismiss, so it's a little premature to be talking dates for a jury trial just yet.

[kellynla]

Run along, missy, I don’t have the time or inclination to respond to deadbeat’s posts...

[Jackson57]

If you got pulled over for speeding and when the cop asks to see your driver’s license shouldn’t you just be allowed to say; “Hey, the state said I was eligible when I first got it, that should be good enough for you, too.”? Give it a try and let us know how that works.

[gop4lyf]

ping for later

[SvenMagnussen]

The Judge in Georgia threatened to fine Orly $10,000 and then upped the fine to $20,000 to launder the payola through his favorite his favorite charity. The Judge ordered the Asst. US Attorney to write a brief to sign off on the scam to give the Judge plausible deniability, i.e. "Hey, the Asst. US Attorney said it was okay."

[CriticalJ]

Nice slam on the Fact Check being nonpartisan.