Posted on 10/13/2009 9:30:14 AM PDT by greyfoxx39
In a meeting with gay-rights activists last week, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid criticized the LDS Church for backing a ballot measure banning same-sex marriage in California, saying the leaders of his faith should have stayed out of the contentious political fight.
Reid, a Democrat from Nevada, is the highest ranking elected official who is a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
-SNIP-
Marchers in Sunday's equality rally, which drew tens of thousands to the U.S. Capitol, repeatedly referenced the Prop 8 defeat in signs, statements and even face paint. But when organizers sat down with Reid, it wasn't a topic they intended to raise. They wanted to thank him for supporting the march and push him on their desire for federal action giving gay Americans the ability to get married, serve openly in the military and fight workplace discrimination.
Reid signed a letter supporting the march and encouraged a sustained lobbying campaign.
In the meeting, those present touched on issues most important to them. Dan Choi, a veteran of the Iraq War, who was booted from the military under the "Don't ask, don't tell" policy, thanked Reid for lobbying President Barack Obama on his behalf. Robin McGehee, of California, talked about her own family. Then, McGehee said, Reid brought up his LDS faith and discussed a recent meeting with Mormons in which he criticized the Prop 8 efforts.
"He personally said they needed to be focused on other things," she said, "and he felt it was harmful for the church to focus on such a divisive issue."
(Excerpt) Read more at sltrib.com ...
I’ll vote with the Mormons on this one ....
He’s toast. He can’t change that. He’s reaching.
Don’t Mormons practice shunning, or some variation?
He probably has the promise of some cushy cabinet job or lobbyist job in return for his support.
Not too sure but JW’s do ... but you can read this: http://www.sltrib.com/ci_?source=most_viewed
Kick his ass out of the LDS! He is not only an interloper, but a heretic!
Oh, good — attack the Mormons. I hear they are running Las Vegas these days. Bye bye Reid. Not a moment too soon.
Polls in NV are showing Reid sucking dirt in relation to both Rep candidates. This is an act of desperation.
I always thought reid was drunk most of the time. By going against his church in Nevada, he either has a death wish or doesn’t plan on running for reelection.
The hand that he’s reaching for to pull him out of his election quagmire is attached to a limp wrist.
Publicly opposing the Church is supposed to be a pretty big no-no.
No. We do excommunicate members who commit serious sins and remain unrepentant. But we do not avoid association with excommunicated persons unless they are a danger. They are invited to attend meetings, but are not asked to speak or teach, pay tithing, or hold a position in the Church.
Obviously, being a slimy politician is not an offense requiring excommunication.
LOLOL! Right on!
Sometimes, they just change your name to “Jack” when they talk about you.
Jack Mormons are not unlike jackasses, from what I hear.
Dont Mormons practice shunning, or some variation?
Why does Harry Reid say that the Mormon church shouldn’t be involved in a divisive issue? Should churches only be involved with issues that aren’t divisive? And who decides?
Why does he say they should be involved with other things instead? This has been a common refrain in the same-sex marriage debate for the past few years. Gay activists, who are the ones filing lawsuits, and forcing the debate about marriage in our society, then become passive aggressive and say “why are we talking about gay marriage? It’s a small issue. We should be talking about education, healthcare, and the war in Iraq instead.”
Was there any controversy about defining marriage until about the past 10 years when gay activists forced the issue? Why are they allowed to get away with saying that those who support traditional marriage are the divisive ones??????
Is this a Saul Alinsky tactic? Stir things up and then say, why is everybody upset about something? That’s exactly what happened with marriage. The definition and structure of marriage was not in doubt or controversy until the lawsuits on the subject started.
If Reid loves the queers so much, perhaps he should “marry” one. I’m sure he’d enjoy that kind of sex.
BTW, I love your screen name. Godzilla is da MAN, er BEAST.
Probably he thinks LDS is so mainstream that it’s like Pelosi still taking communion.
Which ones? (Given that Reid is a Mormon)
All I can say is:
Harry: Shaddup!
Care to define "danger" in this context?
Mormons urged to stop shunning gay family members
Not a "official" practice by LDS, but shunning "apostates" is common.
Well, Reid is only taking the line by some of the outgoing top 70 general authorities in the Lds church.
I'm sure if you sat them down in a room, SOME of the Lds general authorities and Reid would actually agree on the following:
"Yes, religion is relevant in politics;
yes, church and state are connected;
yes, the church should stand up for what it believes;
but DON'T push your values into the political sphere"
Don't believe me when it comes to the Lds general authorities? Well, just read this brief excerpt from what an ex-top 70 said when he was lecturing BYU students last Friday...note the bold-faced reference:
Robert S. Woods, president of the Boston Temple, former member of the 2nd Quorum of the Seventy and professor at the University of Virginia and Naval War College, lectured on the relationship between politics and religion on Friday. President Woods first began his lecture by clearing up any misconceptions about the link between politics and religion.
In my experience, over the years when people thought about the relation between politics and religion, they thought it was irrelevant, Woods said. Religion is not irrelevant to the political process of this country, and will continue to have more of an impact throughout the years.
There is an undeniable connection between church and state, he said. However, there are several countries and civilizations that will continue to deny this link.
The basic unit of analysis should be and has not been the state, nor the local political community, but civilization itself, said Woods. It shapes the state and local political communities.
Woods said that we, as Latter-day Saints, have a responsibility to stand up for what we believe without pushing our values into the political sphere. ("Temple president speaks on the link between religion, politics," BYU Daily Universe, http://universe.byu.edu/node/2871)
Reid is a Mormon, like Ted Kennedy was a Catholic.
No, Reid is a Mormon, like Glenn Beck is a Mormon. (They're BOTH converts)
And they're BOTH welcomed with open arms by the Lds church. (Otherwise, why would BYU have given Reid an all-student, all-staff forum two years ago this month, with many giving him a standing ovation?)
Absolutely, happened to one of my family a very prominent Mormon at the time.
Mormons have a lot more babies than gays.
I think that Reid is a Birth Mormon.
Well, there's two ways to look at what you just said: One way is to apply your "publicly opposing the church is supposed to be a pretty big no-no" as applied to Harry Reid; the other is apply that same statement to yourself.
I mean, it appears to me both you and Harry Reid disagree at some level with the Lds church -- Reid on Prop 8 -- you for "let[ting] Reid continue to shoot off his mouth like this."
So, tell us...if they know who you are...is your bishop going to raise this as a loyalty question on your next temple recommend interview?
Or, let's say some FReeper openly disagreed with BYU inviting Harry Reid for a "y'all come" speech @ BYU October, '07. How would that expression of disagreement with the Lds church be perceived as any different than Reid's disagreement with the church over Prop 8?
My stance? I'm glad the Lds church got involved in Prop 8. What a lot of people don't realize is that Prop 8 wasn't the first time Lds got involved in opposing same-sex marriage. It got involved in Prop 22 (2000) all without the media fanfare back then. That also was a sound decision by Mormon leadership.
So a homosexual activist group implies that the LDS Church is not doing enough to accommodate homosexuality.
Are you surprised that homosexual activists would say such a thing? Are you inclined to agree with them?
Nope, Reid's a Mormon convert who the Lds church has welcomed with such open arms that they readily made him into an elders quorum president, a high councilor, and Sunday School superintendent!
Reid, who has served as an elders quorum president, high councilor and Sunday school superintendent, converted to Mormonism while attending Utah State University in 1960. He subsequently converted his wife Landra from Judaism to the Mormon faith and has raised his family in the church.
"Senate's New Majority Whip: Senator Harry Reid of Nevada" by Christopher Smith, Salt Lake Tribune, June 9 2001 URL: http://www.sltrib.com/06092001/utah/104290.htm
I agree with you.
So Reid tells the churches in Nevada to Shut Up. Well instead they might just turn out to vote. Perhaps they will tell him their feelings about being TOLD how their health care will be and that their seniors are being selfish about it.
Oh and they may have something to say about being told that Obama is their Messiah. I don't think they've (except the Liberal ones) have liked that.
Or as my Aunt said about a "Space Shot" Utah Senetor, "I loved him as a Brother but he wore out his welcome."
I mean, it appears to me both you and Harry Reid disagree at some level with the Lds church -- Reid on Prop 8 -- you for "let[ting] Reid continue to shoot off his mouth like this."
So, tell us...if they know who you are...is your bishop going to raise this as a loyalty question on your next temple recommend interview?
Good heavens, Colo... Have you gotten into the catnip again?
I can't even make sense of what you wrote.
Are you trying to say that my disagreement with Reid is somehow the same as disagreeing with the Church? ...or are you saying that I should do something about Reid's standing in the Church?
I'm honestly stumped here.
I'll lay it out:
1. Harry Reid disagrees with Lds church getting involved with Prop 8.
2. You apparently disagree with church letting Harry Reid continue to shoot off his mouth like this.
Conclusion A: You both disagree with the church (different issues).
3. You said "Publicly opposing the Church is supposed to be a pretty big no-no" -- in reference to Reid.
4. I pointed out that you just did the same thing -- you publicly opposed the church by wondering outloud why the Lds church is "let[ting] Reid continue to shoot off his mouth like this."
Conclusion B: Didn't you just publicly oppose the church (for failing to properly muzzle Reid)? By your own standards, is that then a "pretty big no-no" too?
LOL, did Reid also “rip” blacks for their overwhelming support of Prop. 8?
Where the Mormons supported Prop. 8 in California ....
Is the LDS church pro-life?
Oh, OK. You're equating the public and specific criticism of Church leadership by a sitting Senator on the critical moral issue of marriage with the posted bewilderment of a single, obscure FReeper who wonders why the Senator gets away with it.
In your mind, those two are equal.
Gotcha.
Personal stories of "apostate" mormons and being shunned for leaving the mormon church
I have my OWN story of being shunned after I left the mormon church.
I wonder how his Jewish wife liked being called a "gentile" by the mormons?
What can I say about anonymous anecdotes describing incidents I did not witness, involving persons I do not know? I would prefer to hear the other side(s) of the story before commenting.
By the way, you did not answer the questions I asked you in my last post. Why?
Insinuations framed as questions deserve no comment...you refuse to address personal stories of mormon shunning after denying the existence of it of which is a well-known fact among mormons. It’s just another “deniable plausibility we don’t do that...officially”.
You are being evasive.
Are you trying to say that my disagreement with Reid is somehow the same as disagreeing with the Church? ...or are you saying that I should do something about Reid’s standing in the Church?
***
Reid the Judas is doing a good job at drawing the line give a horse enough rope and he will hang himself!
In 2004 Reid was attending my ward in NYC one Sunday I did all I could do to hold my tongue because it was the Lord’s house I stayed still.
But no one greeted him like when Orrin Hatch would attend.
I've seen enough miraculous conversions in my life to know that even Reid could repent and get his head screwed on straight.
But so far, I'm not liking what comes out of his mouth.
He may just keep going and kick himself out of the Church.
I am being evasive? You are the one denying shunning by mormons when it is practiced daily against anyone who leaves the mormon church and building your straw man to avoid admitting that you lied when you said that mormons do NOT shun.
How many "apostates" have you personally avoided when meeting them in public, looked the other way, discussed their offense with other mormons?
I detest homosexual behavior. I also detest holier-than-thou behavior by a group that believes that polygamy is a requirement to salvation.
"After Joseph Smith married some thirty-eight women, he introduced this "celestial" marriage form to his innermost circle of followers. By early 1846, nearly 200 men had adopted the polygamous lifestyle, with an average of nearly four women per man717 wives in all, with more wives to come after leaving Nauvoo."
Present-day "celestial" marriage allows for the "sealing" of multiple wives to a mormon man after death. Eternal polygamy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.