Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama lawyer says no position on Bush-era wiretaps
Rueters ^ | 10/9/09 | Reuters

Posted on 10/09/2009 4:20:57 PM PDT by Nachum

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A lawyer for the Obama administration said on Friday it had no position on the legality of the former Bush administration's program to intercept Americans' e-mails and phone calls without a warrant.

The lawyer spoke at a 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals hearing on a lawsuit in which 16 lawyers representing Guantanamo Bay detainees demanded the government release records of electronic surveillance they believe was conducted without a warrant concerning their clients' cases.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: lawyer; obama; says; wiretaps

1 posted on 10/09/2009 4:20:57 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, ping


2 posted on 10/09/2009 4:21:27 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

He can vote present and make it look like a decision.


3 posted on 10/09/2009 4:23:35 PM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* 'I love you guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

No, silly, the Bush era is over. This is the Obama era. They’ll be Obama era wiretaps now.

Sheesh...


4 posted on 10/09/2009 4:31:14 PM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm (The worst is behind us. Unfortunately it is really well endowed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

This is a myth.

No one has ever admitted, demonstrated, or proven “warrantless wiretapping” or “eavesdropping” at any time. Both of those require the interception of voice communication.

The intercepts that have been discussed were the equivalents of trap and trace and pen register programs, which is capturing telephone numbers (and possibly email addresses). In the United States both are given the lowest possible level of scrutiny by the courts, for the simple reason that phone numbers are not “owned” by the user nor are they considered “private.”


5 posted on 10/09/2009 6:52:14 PM PDT by angkor (The U.S. Congress is at war with America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson