Posted on 10/07/2009 11:30:59 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
JERUSALEM (AP) - Israel's foreign minister says there's no chance of ending the Israeli-Palestinian conflict for many years.
Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman says efforts to reach a final peace deal have failed since the first accord between Israel and the Palestinians in 1993.
Lieberman says it's unrealistic to think a long-term agreement on ending the conflict can be reached at this time and that whoever thinks an agreement can be reached soon just doesn't understand the situation.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Another loss for the Obozo. He’s really on a roll.
I work in a restaurant in Dallas and I knew this. Why is it such a mystery?
If there’s no chance of ending the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The next logical choice is to end the Palestinians.
Oh, the humanity!
Israel suggested a division of sovereignty over the Temple Mount whereby a future Palestinian state would control the upper level, and Israel the lower one. Berkovits reveals that thenforeign minister Shlomo Ben-Ami told him that, in December 2000, he had offered the Palestinians full and exclusive sovereignty over the Temple Mount (including the lower level), provided merely that the Palestinians recognize the sites holiness to the Jewish people and prevent the destruction of Jewish remnants on the Mount. Yet even that proposal was rejected by the Palestinians, who have, to this day, refused to concede the Jewish connection to the Temple Mount, and are reluctant even to allow Jews to pray in front of a small section of the Western Wall. Why are the Palestinians so determined not to share sovereignty over the site with Israel? According to Berkovits, one of the main reasons is that nothing scares [the Palestinians] more than the discovery of remnants of the Jerusalem Temple underneath the Temple Mount.
The outcome has been the destruction of countless Jewish relics from the First and Second Temple periods. As a result of the Israeli governments inaction, vindicated by the High Court of Justice, the Waqf was able, in November 1999, to open a small emergency exit for the enormous mosque built in Solomons Stables that required the digging of a 1,600-square meter, fifteen-meter deep pit at the site, and the removal of more than ten thousand tons of archaeological rubble containing artifacts dating back to the First Temple period. Decorations and inscriptions were polished away from ancient stones, and stones with Hebrew writings and Hasmonean stars were thrown into Jerusalems municipal garbage dump. The small emergency exit became a new mosque named Al Aksa Al-Qadim. Berkovits relates that he visited the Al Aksa Al-Qadim mosque in November 2004 together with his students:
On the ceiling were four domes. Two of them still bore rare artistic inscriptions, which are the work of Jewish artists from the Second Temple period. I noticed that those inscriptions had been covered with plaster, and reported this to the Antiquities Authority after the tour. A senior representative of the Antiquities Authority told me that he was aware of the plaster that had been used to cover the Jewish inscriptions. When I asked him why he didnt send workers with a ladder to remove the plaster, he replied that whoever climbs up the ladder will never be able to climb it down.
Thus do the Palestinians publicly deny the Temples existence even as they actively erase proofs to the contrary; thus does Israels High Court of Justice acquiesce to the destruction of evidence of the Temples Jewish past for fear of upsetting Muslim sensitivities. It is hardly surprising, then, that the Waqf has succeeded over the past decade in building, illegally, two enormous mosques underneath the Temple Mount (the Solomons Stables mosque and the Al Aksa Al-Qadim mosque), and plans to connect them with underground tunnels, thus effectively turning the Temple Mount into an exclusively Muslim site. Should this state of affairs continue unimpeded, in the near future the last remnants of the Jerusalem Temple will effectively disappear, and the Palestinians will be able to deny its existence without having to be burdened by new archaeological counterevidence.
http://www.spectator.co.uk/melaniephillips/352246/the-third-destruction-of-the-temple.thtml
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.