News from Alan Keyes: Judge Confirms Eligibility Trial to Proceed

AIPNews.com ^ | October 7, 2009 | Alan Keyes

[EternalVigilance]

By Alan Keyes
October 7, 2009
Loyal to Liberty

 

I just received a call from Orly Taitz, my attorney in the case seeking proof of Obama's eligibility for the Office of President of the United States. Judge Carter has released a statement declaring that the dates he set for the hearing and trial on the eligibility issue are confirmed, and it will move forward as scheduled. Apparently he was not swayed by the Obama lawyer's arguments.

Loyal to Liberty ...

[murphE]

ping

[thethirddegree]

Great news!

[pissant]

Whoa Nelly. Katie bar the door.

[ChuckHam]

I hope this is true. Time to see the long form.

[Frantzie]

Can we confirm this? I hope it is true.

[pissant]

could this be?

[autumnraine]

I wish I could get excited. I just expect to hear that he was texted or tweeted something and so no go. Case dismissed.

Or something equally as lame.

[thouworm]

ping

[faucetman]

Exactly, I’ll believe it when Orly says so on her blog

[pissant]

LOL. We’ll see once Carter posts his decision.

[dubie]

O’RLY?

[MrB]

Rev 12:12
He is filled with fury,
because he knows that his time is short

[Da Coyote]

15 quadrillion cesterces to the individual who leaks the documents.

[mbynack]

Not to be a smart aleck, but what happens if the court determines Obama wasn’t qualified? How long will the appeals process last and how would you go about removing him from office? Would it require impeachment hearings by the house and senate?

[TribalPrincess2U]

For now.

Zero will have to get rid of this subject.

What better way then to have it found
legal and dropped once and for all.

[EternalVigilance]

I’m working on getting further information.

[Frantzie]

Anything on WorldNet Daily?

[chris37]

AIP... I don’t know. I’d like to see this story from any other source before I react.

[OldNavyVet]

What about discovery?

[devere]

I am surprised and very delighted!

[mnehring]

I hope this is true.

Some may disagree with Keyes' various approaches to how he runs campaigns but one thing he isn't is a liar.

[TribalPrincess2U]

I think instant hanging is out of the question. Darn it!

[MrB]

[pissant]

Nope. But it’s best to wait for Carter’s judgement to be posted before getting too excited. But I have at least some hope that he will come down on the side of the Constitution now.

[Tennessee Nana]

Good...

and discovery ???

[LucyT]

.

[antiRepublicrat]

I just want the issue to have its day in court and be over with, one way or the other. Then this whole “birther” thing can go away.

[EternalVigilance]

Why? Three of the plaintiffs are AIP.

[EternalVigilance]

I have a hunch that this is a minute order or something that restates the trial dates. That doesn’t mean he’s made a ruling on the defense’s motion to dismiss.

I’ll find out shortly.

[Frantzie]

I wish more people in the GOP supported the Constitution like Alan Keyes. Yes I know he left the party for the election but I think it may be have to do with this issue. Keyes knew O was not eligble. He and others I think ran on the ballot in CA for this specific reason.

God bless Alan Keyes.

[mnehring]

Not to be a smart aleck, but what happens if the court determines Obama wasn’t qualified?

Just a prediction, but I bet Pelosi and Reid would immediately rush to their bodies of congress and attempt to push an emergency legislation changing(clarifying) what an NBC is per what they will claim is authority to do so in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4. (not saying it is right, just predicting their justification) Of course, it would be retroactive. I also bet a lot of R's would go along with it for the sake of 'unity'.

[mnehring]

I believe he left the party long before this election. EV can confirm this for us.

[RebelTXRose]

Discovery????

[pissant]

Always good to be cautious. But it would seem a bit odd to restate the dates to just have them canceled via dismissal.

[MileHi]

Un friggin believable!

My hat is off to Judge Carter.

[swheats]

That is awesome news. Thank goodness Mr. Keyes never gave up.

[EternalVigilance]

He officially exited the GOP on April 15, 2008 with a speech in Hazelton, PA.

[EBH]

Well I would think there would be an immediate restraining order issued. A huge legal issue like this would put Biden in. The real question should be asked, who else knew?

[Frantzie]

Juan McCain would be co-sponsor.

[EternalVigilance]

We’re hoping.

And still praying.

[chris37]

If that is the African International Press, it’s because of their claim of having an interview with Michell Obama but never releasing it. If it is not the same AIP, pls forgive me, I don’t want to get my hopes up.

[pissant]

That was API, not AIP

[IrishPennant]

[Frantzie]

Wait til it is confirmed. I am sure we all want it to be true (except the trolls who have not shown up yet).

Keeping fingers crossed and a prayer.

[pissant]

Pelosi wouldn’t have to. The GOP would probably introduce it.

[stockpirate]

Here you go, let’s hear how happy you are that you have been DEAD WRONG and that this is actually proceeding.

[rxsid]

Bump...court doc:

Civil Minutes - General

[Dan(9698)]

A huge legal issue like this would put Biden in.

The electoral Collage votes on them as a team.

[sourcery]

...how would you go about removing him from office? Would it require impeachment hearings by the house and senate?

No. Obama allegedgly became POTUS de jure when Congress counted the electoral college votes, and found (as an official Act of Congress) that Obama had received the most votes—as required by the Twelfth Amendment. However, just like any other Act of Congress (usually such are statutes, but not always,) if the SCOTUS renders an official decision that the Act is Unconstitutional, then it retroactively ceases to have any effect or operation. There is never any requirement for Congress to then vote the law away, it's automatically and instantly gone, as though it had never existed.

That's what would happen, were the SCOTUS to rule that Obama cannot Constitutionally be POTUS: He would never have been POTUS in the first place, making it logically and legally impossible to "remove" him (you can't remove someone from an office they have never held.)