Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Beware of the Republican Establishment
Human Events ^ | 10/06/2009 | Bay Buchanan

Posted on 10/06/2009 1:38:31 PM PDT by IdahoPatriot

Between the town hall meetings and the tea party rallies, millions of Americans are taking to the streets to protest a government gone berserk. They are angry and determined to take their country back. But there are snakes in the grass intent on using this movement to return to power, not the people, but the Republican establishment. If this happens we lose everything, including our country.

(Excerpt) Read more at humanevents.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: beware; candidates; establishment; gop; rino; rnc; rncchairman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-54 next last
The grassroots needs to be made aware of this treachery--while people are focused on Obama, we have people in the Republican Party undermining the conservative movement!!!
1 posted on 10/06/2009 1:38:32 PM PDT by IdahoPatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: IdahoPatriot

Bay Buchanan worked for Mitt Romney against conservatives and before that for Pat Buchanan against all Republicans and she criticizes others for betraying conservatism??


2 posted on 10/06/2009 1:41:42 PM PDT by iowamark (certified by Michael Steele as "ugly and incendiary")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IdahoPatriot

We’ve known this for a long time now-—just look at the GOP hatchet men trying to bury Sarah Palin-—and failing.


3 posted on 10/06/2009 1:42:29 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Seems mighty hypocritical doesn’t it...


4 posted on 10/06/2009 1:42:54 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
She might be a hypocrite but I agree with what she is saying. We need real Americans to run who are not owned by the party elite.
5 posted on 10/06/2009 1:47:59 PM PDT by peeps36 (Democrats Don't Need No Stinking Input From You Little People)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: IdahoPatriot
we have people in the Republican Party undermining the conservative movement!!!

One of the reasons we have Obama is because the Republican Party undermined the conservative movement in the 2008 primaries.

6 posted on 10/06/2009 1:48:44 PM PDT by skully (Sorry I didn't know Marxism was a race!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skully

The RINO’s are attempting to make a comeback!

Stop them in their tracks!

Be Ever Vigilant!


7 posted on 10/06/2009 1:52:39 PM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
Here's more: Why Is NRCC Backing Liberals? by John Gizzi 10/05/2009 Excerpts: The Republican in charge of his party’s national campaign strategy to retake the House of Representatives says his goal is “to retire Nancy Pelosi as speaker, nothing less,” in 2010. Scozzafava Controversy Sessions, who has had a better relationship with conservatives than several of his recent predecessors at the NRCC, also addressed recent criticism from the right about his committee’s support of State Assemblywoman Dede Scozzafava, the GOP nominee in the special election in New York’s 23rd District for the seat of former Republican Rep. (and now Secretary of the Army) John McHugh. Along with her stands in favor of abortion and same-sex marriage, Scozzafava has been strongly criticized for her past acceptance of the ballot line of the Working Families Party, which has a close affiliation with the radical, scandal-ridden, community-organizing organization ACORN. (Scozzafava has recently said she would vote to deny federal funds to ACORN). Because of Scozzafava’s obvious liberalism, many conservative Republicans have bolted to support the Conservative Party nominee, Doug Hoffman, a local CPA. Former Sen. Fred Thompson (R-Tenn.) recently endorsed Hoffman and American Conservative Union Chairman David Keene called on conservative contributors to withhold their donations to the NRCC because it is backing Scozzafava. Angered by this criticism, Sessions shot back that he had urged county GOP leaders in the 23rd District to “open the process and hold a series of debates between Republican candidates” before they selected a nominee for the November 3 special election and they did this. He strongly insisted that the NRCC had “absolutely nothing” to do with the nomination process beyond encouraging a more open procedure. “You may not like the closed process but that is the rule there and at least they did try to open it up with debates, in which nine candidates were included,” he said. In admitting Scozzafava’s liberal record on several issues, Sessions nevertheless said his committee would back her “because she is one more vote to make John Boehner speaker. Look, you cannot have a candidate with my conservative record or that of other Texas Republicans in every district in the country.” http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=33829
8 posted on 10/06/2009 2:08:43 PM PDT by IdahoPatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: IdahoPatriot

IP signed up Nov 2008 and around 17 posts in 9 months.

We have two parties, one wins, one loses.

Too many third party posters are undermining the the opportunity to block Obama in congress and to replace him in 2012


9 posted on 10/06/2009 2:14:03 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IdahoPatriot

Wrong beware. It is the libertarian types, and third party pushers, like the author of this thread, we should beware of. I say throw out the Rino’s and the squishy GOP leadership, and have a conservative Repub party.

All this third party hype is going to do is insure the left will remain in power by splitting the vote.


10 posted on 10/06/2009 2:15:47 PM PDT by sasportas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sasportas

I heard today that Corzine who had been trailing his challenger Christy in polls for NJ Governor by about 14 points has now moved to a dead heat. I guess NJ realizes again that if we’re going to vote for a leftist with a shady background may as well go with the experts in the field and stay with the democrat.


11 posted on 10/06/2009 2:24:39 PM PDT by marlon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: skully

Most of the Republican “leadership” would rather lose than allow conservative candidates.


12 posted on 10/06/2009 2:24:57 PM PDT by arthurus ("If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: IdahoPatriot

AMEN, very astute observation!

Spot on...


13 posted on 10/06/2009 2:25:26 PM PDT by TheDailyChange (Politics,Conservatism,Liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skully

we have people in the Republican Party undermining the conservative movement!!!

John McCain for one.


14 posted on 10/06/2009 2:26:23 PM PDT by Bitsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: IdahoPatriot
Marco Rubio, US Senate candidate from Florida, said it best.

"If you are unhappy with the Republican establishment, then let's get a new establishment,"

15 posted on 10/06/2009 2:26:35 PM PDT by Darren McCarty (We do what we have to do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthurus
Most of the Republican “leadership” would rather lose than allow conservative candidates.

Conservatives actually expect things to get done, and that interfers with tee time.

16 posted on 10/06/2009 2:28:37 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Rio: Gold / Madrid: Silver / Tokyo: Bronze / Obama: Lead weight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Bitsy

There’s a little good news...It looks like JD Hayworth is going to run against McCain. The only problem is that there’s a bunch of conservatives already backing Chris Simcox who was the leader of the MINUTEMEN and is running. He has baggage. He will lose against McCain. I think Hayworth is our shot.


17 posted on 10/06/2009 2:30:33 PM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sasportas
and have a conservative Repub party.

This is the only solution we have time for. If all fails in 2010 and 2012 then we will have nothing but time to form another celebrate our membership in the single Obama Fascist Party.

18 posted on 10/06/2009 2:33:36 PM PDT by paulycy (Screw the RACErs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Bay Buchanan worked for Mitt Romney against conservatives and before that for Pat Buchanan against all Republicans and she criticizes others for betraying conservatism??

I recall she was also hooked up with the Ross Perot crowd (hosting a radio show on the UAW’s network!) back in the 90’s


19 posted on 10/06/2009 2:37:50 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Palin was Pat Buchanan’s Alaska state director in 1996.


20 posted on 10/06/2009 2:40:40 PM PDT by Palin Republic (Palin - Bachmann 2012 : Girl Power!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
McCain would beat Hayworth 70-30 in the primary. Hayworth is dumb but not that dumb.

McCain will win the general with 60-70%.

21 posted on 10/06/2009 2:49:41 PM PDT by MARTIAL MONK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
And she against Palin because she is a “quitter”.
22 posted on 10/06/2009 2:52:29 PM PDT by HapaxLegamenon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol

Divide and conquer. Now is the time for the infiltrators to take advantage of the losing side. I went to a Tea Party in SoCal and it was reeking of infiltration. Whether they are third party malcontents, PaulBots or leftists, I do not know.


23 posted on 10/06/2009 3:01:35 PM PDT by La Enchiladita (GO DODGERS!!! ALL THE WAY!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: marlon
I heard today that Corzine who had been trailing his challenger Christy in polls for NJ Governor by about 14 points has now moved to a dead heat.
I guess NJ realizes again that if we’re going to vote for a leftist with a shady background may as well go with the experts in the field and stay with the democrat.


NJ is run by the unions and the teachers.
If Christy is elected it will send a chill down the spine of democrats everywhere.

If Corzine wins, he'll shoulder the blame for the mess in NJ instead of Christy.

What a world...
24 posted on 10/06/2009 3:10:16 PM PDT by novemberslady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

Bay Buchanan, forever an opportunist.


25 posted on 10/06/2009 3:11:40 PM PDT by elizabethgrace (I pray for our military, our Republic, Bibi and Israel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
Right message, wrong messenger.

Despite Bay Buchanan's less-than conservative background, she makes a valid point, whatever her actual motivations, which I suspect may be to see a third party formed, which would be totally futile and ensure Democrat rule for another decade or more.

It's obvious that conservatives need to overthrow the entrenched GOP 'establishment'. We do that by financially supporting the campaigns of, working and voting for conservative candidates, ignoring what the RNC wants or who it endorses. We stop sending any of our hard-earned money to the RNC and we ignore the fake 'conservative values' BS coming from GOP 'establishment' candidates.

Bey Buchanan may be hypocritical, but she has an argument to make. It's going to be a bloody war to oust the neo-cons from controlling the GOP - but it has to be done. Our nation is in real danger from the Marxists now in power. We can't afford more mealy-mouthed, corporate types to 'represent' us (and sell us out as soon as the opportunity arises) and pretend to be 'conservative' Republicans. No more!

This is why I like Sarah Palin - because the 'establishment' Republicans don't - and the left simply loathes her. So, she must be good for America.

26 posted on 10/06/2009 3:13:57 PM PDT by Jim Scott (Obama LIES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sasportas
It is the libertarian types, and third party pushers, like the author of this thread, we should beware of.

But wait a minute. I thought libertarians were insignificant during the campaign. So how do they suddenly become powerful on election day?
Without a message that includes libertarians, the GOP will keep losing elections.

I say throw out the Rino’s and the squishy GOP leadership, and have a conservative Repub party.

Sorry but this isn't 1980 anymore. The Republican Party still hasn't fixed their broken primary system. They are attacking people like Palin and Paul who have brought in hordes of small gov't voters back in the GOP. They are endorsing RINOs over real conservatives with grassroots support. If they keep this up, there is no alternative but to go 3rd party.

27 posted on 10/06/2009 3:20:31 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (90% of the fedgov is unconstitutional. The other 10% besides the military doesnt know what it's doin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita
Divide and conquer. Now is the time for the infiltrators to take advantage of the losing side. I went to a Tea Party in SoCal and it was reeking of infiltration. Whether they are third party malcontents, PaulBots or leftists, I do not know.

Your pathetic, small-minded name-calling is no match for the facts - it was that kook, RON PAUL, out of his memorable campaign, who initiated the Tea Party and anti-government grassroots movement as it exists today. The people that supported him are the very people who are out there at the Tea Parties and who attended the Town Halls and March on D.C., and who forced McNut to choose a libertarian-minded frontier Governor named Sarah Palin.

So keep calling libertarians and other advocates of 3rd parties names but DON'T BITCH when Republicans lose close elections because of them.

28 posted on 10/06/2009 3:27:14 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (90% of the fedgov is unconstitutional. The other 10% besides the military doesnt know what it's doin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

You are correct La E. I have seen the same PaulBots and know others in various other states who have seen the same thing.
They push candidates who will get 1% of the vote if they are lucky and they hand out flyers advertising their 9/11 Truther movie.

These are the people we can thank for the likes of Obama and his bunch.


29 posted on 10/06/2009 3:29:11 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
He has baggage. He will lose against McCain. I think Hayworth is our shot.

Everyone has baggage.

Reading on Wiki about how Hayworth lost his congressional seat, it seems that:

1. He was closely tied to Jack Abramoff. You can bet this will come back, but at least Hayworth will have four years of Democrat scandals to weaken this attack.

2. The local newspaper turned on Hayworth and accused him of being overbearing, withdrawing their endorsement of him. This is the kind of personal attack that they will go with, that he has a temper and is difficult to work with.

-PJ

30 posted on 10/06/2009 3:31:59 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (Comprehensive congressional reform legislation only yields incomprehensible bills that nobody reads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Palin Republic

Palin was not a supporter of Buchanan. that has been proven false.
They had a convention in Alaska and as a courtesy welcomed them.

Only the Liberals and the other fringe groups still try to push that crap.
Sarah was not supporter of Buchanan.


31 posted on 10/06/2009 3:38:05 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
I'm as establishment as they come. So are the car dealers, hardware store owners, contractors and all the others that are the Republican establishment. We are all but holding the door open for Governor Palin.

She has a fan club. That's nice. She needs an organization! Build it, dammit, build it. We are here for her. The money is here for her. Build it, dammit, build it.

32 posted on 10/06/2009 3:54:53 PM PDT by MARTIAL MONK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

You raised a good point, your last one anyway. A sad state of affairs in the GOP, indeed. You mentioned 1980, I have no doubt, considering the Orwellian nightmare we now have, that real conservatives out there are mad enough with the GOP leadership to bring back what we had in 1980.


33 posted on 10/06/2009 4:00:45 PM PDT by sasportas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Palin Republic

Sarah Palin has always denied claims that she was a Buchanan supporter:

http://blogs.jta.org/politics/article/2008/08/31/999533/sarah-palin-mazen-asbahi-and-the-stifling-of-democracy
“”Except that, in real time, she corrected the impression in a letter to a local newspaper: “When presidential candidates visit our community, I am always happy to meet them. I’ll even put on their button when handed one as a polite gesture of respect,” she wrote in a letter to the Anchorage Daily News in 1999.

I don’t entirely blame the blogger who originated the story – AP stories are likelier to come up much higher in Nexis searches then letters to the ADN editor. But, geez, couldn’t U.S. Rep. Robert Wexler (D-Fla.) have waited a little before calling McCain’s selection a “direct affront to the Jewish community”? It turns out she was an official – not just a supporter – of the Republican primaries campaign of Steve Forbes that year. (Buchanan had bolted the GOP and was running as a candidate of the Reform Party.)

That should have killed the story. But Buchanan then said he remembered her attending a fund-raiser for his 1996 GOP candidacy bid. (His sister Bay Buchanan now tells Politico it might have been for Jerry Ward, a local ally of Buchanan.) It seems credible – Buchanan, now an MSNBC analyst, corrected host Christ Matthews, who thought it had been 1992.

But so what? Let’s take what we know about Palin-Buchanan: She might have attended a fund-raiser in 1996. She didn’t give any money to Buchanan’s campaign, however, nor to Jerry Ward, and was not an official of the campaign.””


34 posted on 10/06/2009 4:04:03 PM PDT by iowamark (certified by Michael Steele as "ugly and incendiary")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Comment #35 Removed by Moderator

Comment #36 Removed by Moderator

To: IdahoPatriot

Duh!

The same old “let’s all get along and work with the President” RINOs are still there.

I keep telling everyone: kicking the Dems out next year won’t mean anything if the Republicans are just as eager to tow the Obama line.

We could be in real trouble...


37 posted on 10/06/2009 4:56:35 PM PDT by Tzimisce (No thanks. We have enough government already. - The Tick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IdahoPatriot
We're surrounded by Republican groupies and Republican insiders that could care less about anything, except their party and or their position within that party...

These Republican frauds are all about compromise over principle, profit regardless of consequences. They've demonstrated this hundreds of times.

Unfortunately, these frauds are everywhere.

38 posted on 10/06/2009 5:02:26 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IdahoPatriot

BTW, ya got some of those people, right here on this thread.


39 posted on 10/06/2009 5:08:24 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Palin Republic

She supported Steve Forbes and the FAIR TAX

http://www.whatswrongwiththeworld.net/2008/09/the_governor_palin_supported_p_1.html

The same people who consider themselves the guardians of reason, continue to offer up one Big Foot-like urban legend after another about Governor Palin. Before the Down syndrome baby-switch conspiracy theory and its subsequent demise, there was the “she supported Pat Buchanan for president” X-File. This too has been demolished, courtesy of David Bernstein at the Volokh Conspiracy:

Palin and Buchanan, II (”Timeline”):
July 17, 1999: AP reports on Pat Buchanan visit to Wasilla, AK. The reporter notes that “among those sporting Buchanan buttons were Wasilla Mayor Sarah Palin and state Sen. Jerry Ward, R-Anchorage.”

July 26, 1999, letter to the editor of the Anchorage Daily News by Sarah Palin:

As mayor of Wasilla, I am proud to welcome all presidential candidates to our city. This is true regardless of their party, or the latest odds of their winning. When presidential candidates visit our community, I am always happy to meet them. I’ll even put on their button when handed one as a polite gesture of respect.

Though no reporter interviewed me for the Associated Press article on the recent visit by a presidential candidate (Metro, July 17), the article may have left your readers with the perception that I am endorsing this candidate, as opposed to welcoming his visit to Wasilla. As mayor, I will welcome all the candidates in Wasilla.

August 7, 1999: AP reports on Steve Forbes’ campaign in Alaska. “Joining the Fairbanks Republican on the leadership committee will be Wasilla Mayor Sarah Palin, and former state GOP chairman Pete Hallgren, who will serve as co-chairs.”

This information is all available on Lexis. Anyone who continues to push the “Sarah Palin supported Pat Buchanan in 2000” line is either willfully ignorant or lying. And there is no evidence thus far except a recollection from Pat Buchanan, contradicted by his sister and campaign manager (see previous post), that she supported him in 1995.


40 posted on 10/06/2009 5:54:20 PM PDT by MestaMachine (One if by land, 2 if by sea, 3 if by Air Force 1.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: IdahoPatriot
we have people in the Republican Party undermining the conservative movement!!!

Nothing new here. Which is why the RNC gets nothing from me but diatribes.

41 posted on 10/06/2009 6:03:05 PM PDT by sionnsar (IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|Remember Neda Agha-Soltan|TV--it's NOT news you can trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine
I never said anything about 2000. I was talking about 1996:

Palin was Pat Buchanan's Alaska state director in 1996

42 posted on 10/06/2009 6:17:08 PM PDT by Palin Republic (Palin - Bachmann 2012 : Girl Power!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Palin Republic

My bad. I’ve seen refutations of that too though. Specifically that PB did not acknowledge that. Might be true, might not. Either way, it doesn’t change my mind about Sarah.

BTW, that post wasn’t directed at you personally. It was a cut and paste from the site, in case you thought it was me addressing you.


43 posted on 10/06/2009 6:25:15 PM PDT by MestaMachine (One if by land, 2 if by sea, 3 if by Air Force 1.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: IdahoPatriot; All

I won’t go down with Republican socialism-lite—arguing a ‘lesser degree’ of the same leftist arguments.

They’re too ‘compassionate’ to lead a free people. Life is hard, the universe is harsh, politicians think they have a chance at changing that, arrogant fools! Humans start dying whenever it’s been tried because it is anti-life, it impossible to make life safe and fair—IT CAN’T HAPPEN IN THIS UNIVERSE.

Years from now, when I’m on my death bed, I will know I supported those who support freedom. I won’t support Republicans who, in effect, do nothing but aid the left.

If enough Americans don’t get this and the vote is ‘divided’ and the left wins elections, then you should view it as a quick death compared to a slow, agonizing one.

Voting for half-*ssed Republicans is just delaying the inevitable.

I will support those who share my values from now on, period.

When it comes to our fundamental principles a watered-down approximation will not save our Republic, I promise you that.


44 posted on 10/06/2009 6:30:37 PM PDT by Boucheau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IdahoPatriot

The writer of this article NAILED IT! Amazing article. Truth telling in a most straight forward way.

This one should get spread around.


45 posted on 10/06/2009 10:58:59 PM PDT by uncitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uncitizen
The writer of this article NAILED IT! Amazing article.

You bet she did, and that is why this thread went mostly ignored.

From the article:

We need primaries to nominate candidates that aren’t owned by party leaders, powerful special interests, nor Corporate America.

See post #38.

46 posted on 10/07/2009 8:44:10 AM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: uncitizen
Bttt

"In Ohio, Rob Portman, a former pro-amnesty congressman and Bush trade rep, announced his bid for the U.S. Senate earlier this year. Then Tom Ganley, a conservative businessman from Cleveland infuriated by the massive uncontrolled spending of Washington, decided to run. Mortal sin, declared the party, which told this self-made successful businessman to get out of the race, that “the U.S. Senate isn’t an entry level position.” The NRSC endorsed Portman and are in full campaign mode.

""(Do these nitwits really think one of the architects of the Bush policy that sent our jobs overseas is going to win the general election in a state with 11% unemployment?)""

47 posted on 10/07/2009 8:49:47 AM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

I think Hayworth is our shot.

I like Hayworth! I may be a little jaded, but maybe the dems/leftists will contribute big to mccain’s run because they could expect the same mess that happened last election to happen in the next one.


48 posted on 10/07/2009 9:05:05 AM PDT by Bitsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

I think Hayworth is our shot.

I like Hayworth! I may be a little jaded, but maybe the dems/leftists will contribute big to mccain’s run because they could expect the same mess that happened last election to happen in the next one.


49 posted on 10/07/2009 9:06:25 AM PDT by Bitsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Bitsy

btt


50 posted on 10/07/2009 1:54:46 PM PDT by uncitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson