Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Eyes Economic Triage Aimed at Unemployed[Obama 'Promote Job Creation'???]
FOXNEWS.com ^ | October 02, 2009 | FOXNEWS.com

Posted on 10/03/2009 4:27:36 AM PDT by Son House

"I'm working closely with my economic advisors to explore any and all additional options and measures that we might take to promote job creation," Obama said after the Labor Department reported that 263,000 Americans lost jobs in September and the unemployment rate rose to 9.8 percent.

Embedded in those numbers was this sobering statistic. The number of Americans unemployed for 27 weeks increased by 450,000 and now totals 5.4 million.

The White House may soon ask Congress to extend three parts of the original $787 billion stimulus law signed in mid-February.

* Extend the current $8,000 first-time home buyer tax credit beyond its scheduled Nov. 30 expiration date.

* Extend the current 65 percent subsidy through the COBRA program so jobless Americans can purchase health insurance for only 35 percent of the premium. After that, the government reimburses the provider for the remaining unpaid amount through a tax credit. The program, which provides nine months of this subsidized insurance coverage, is also due to expire on Dec. 31.

* Extend the full 79-week unemployment insurance package now available through the stimulus to laid of workers. The stimulus provided extended jobless benefits in high-unemployment states and tacked on a $25-per week stipend. Eligibility for extended benefits and the stipend expires on Dec. 31.

Congressional Democrats said talks on moving this type of legislation are "preliminary." But they are gaining velocity as the White House tries to cope with persistent unemployment and the political anxiety it has begun to generate among Democrats preparing to run for re-election in 2010.

Two White House officials adamantly denied a second stimulus is coming. But a senior administration official confirmed moves are afoot to extend three stimulus-created programs targeted at softening the blow of unemployment and boosting home sales.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aimed; bho44; bhoeconomy; economic; triage; unemployed
More bait-n-switch speak. Easily predictable: Everybody continues to hoard their money till the tax cuts for the rich are law
1 posted on 10/03/2009 4:28:22 AM PDT by Son House
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Son House
Well we printed nearly a trillion dollars of stimulus money and the result of that is unemployment rates not seen since 1983. It isn't hard to conclude what the result of this program will be.

Hopefully the idiots who voted for 0bama will wake up and realize that 0bama isn't stupid or unlucky, but rather he is purposefully doing everything he can to destroy the economy.

2 posted on 10/03/2009 4:34:53 AM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son House
Obama Eyes Economic Triage Aimed at Unemployed

Again Obama demonstrates his naivete.

One cannot be "pro-jobs" while simultaneous being "anti-business" and "anti-rich folks".

Obama clearly has no idea where jobs come from...he apparently thinks they are created by the unions and government.

Get a frikken clue, Barky!

3 posted on 10/03/2009 4:35:04 AM PDT by SonOfDarkSkies (For good judgment ask...What would Obama do? Then do the opposite!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son House

Typical Liberal:”My economic plan isn’t working, so lets do more of it”.


4 posted on 10/03/2009 4:35:26 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Global Warming Theory is extremely robust with respect to data. All observations confirm it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son House

Please, will someone... ANYONE... ask this nitwit, narcisistic, clueless a$$ clown how ANY of these things will promote job growth!


5 posted on 10/03/2009 4:35:57 AM PDT by Common Sense 101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son House

I’ve noticed a trend among my Obamabot acquaintances - they often invoke WPA and CCC during discussions of the economy, and specifically, unemployment...

It hasn’t percolated to the surface at the ‘policy’ level of the Dem claque, but the groundwork is being laid down here in the weeds...


6 posted on 10/03/2009 4:38:08 AM PDT by Uncle Ike (Rope is cheap, and there are lots of trees...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son House
Here’s an easy plan:

1)Cut Capital gains tax to 5% for the next 10 years.

2)Cut Corporate Income Tax to 15%

7 posted on 10/03/2009 4:38:58 AM PDT by Mikey_1962 (Obama: The Affirmative Action President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son House
Two White House officials adamantly denied a second stimulus is coming. But a senior administration official confirmed moves are afoot to extend three stimulus-created programs targeted at softening the blow of unemployment and boosting home sales.

The same failed policies they've already tried.

8 posted on 10/03/2009 4:42:04 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962

That’s supply side economics. Neither party will even consider it.


9 posted on 10/03/2009 4:43:35 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pnh102

Speaking of 1983, maybe they should look at what Reagan did to revive the economy back then.


10 posted on 10/03/2009 4:44:27 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Son House
Why does everyone assume that liberals even want the business climate to recover? I would be willing to bet that they would argue that "because the market has permanently broken", they should just have the government step in and loot everyone with a dime manage more of the economy itself. It really is like the end of Atlas Shrugged, as the leaders roamed around looking for some pickings.
11 posted on 10/03/2009 4:46:55 AM PDT by tjbandrowsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son House

The One and his minions know damn well all they have to do is cut taxes. This is just a game of theirs, act like you’re trying to help while actively destroying the country.


12 posted on 10/03/2009 4:47:56 AM PDT by snippy_about_it (Looking for our Sam Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Do away with personal income tax and go back to raising revenue of taxes and tariffs of goods from overseas.


13 posted on 10/03/2009 4:48:23 AM PDT by ez ("Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is." - Milton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Son House

Job creation? why thats a NEW idea! Call it what it is planned welfare to keep the unemployed unemployed and under the administrations control. MOVING FORWARD AS SCHEDULED!


14 posted on 10/03/2009 4:48:24 AM PDT by ronnie raygun (I would invest in torches and pitchforks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
Speaking of 1983, maybe they should look at what Reagan did to revive the economy back then.

They are... looking at everything they did back in 1983 to stop him.

15 posted on 10/03/2009 4:50:15 AM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Son House
Extend the current $8,000 first-time home buyer tax credit = Encourage people to buy homes who can't afford them

Extend the current 65 percent subsidy through the COBRA program so jobless Americans can purchase health insurance =

Take my earnings to buy health care for others

Extend the full 79-week unemployment insurance package = Pay people to not work

Brilliant ideas. We will recover in no time now.

16 posted on 10/03/2009 4:52:26 AM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Ike
I’ve noticed a trend among my Obamabot acquaintances - they often invoke WPA and CCC during discussions of the economy, and specifically, unemployment...

Isn't it fun to point out that none of those government agencies did anything to actually grow the economy.

17 posted on 10/03/2009 4:59:31 AM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Son House

The lesson DumBO hasn’t learned is that sharing the wealth does not make everyone wealthy, it makes everyone poor. Read some Hayek and Hazlitt, ZerO.


18 posted on 10/03/2009 5:05:34 AM PDT by depressed in 06 (ZerOcare: Bureaucratic best practices equals death panels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son House

If big government could fix the economy, we’d never have recessiona. If big government could fix unemployment, we’d have 100% employment.

But it can’t and all it’s doing is sucking money out of the private sector to hand out patronage jobs. From the resources used to create ONE job in the public sector, ONE AND A HALF jobs could be created in the private sector. And the private sector jobs would be long lasting and based on market demands, rather than just government make work ones.


19 posted on 10/03/2009 5:08:18 AM PDT by randita (Release ALL the ACORN video now or risk having it deep sixed by Holder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son House
Spending money we don't have is not the answer, just ask Bernie Madoff.

This administration is spending us into a real mess.

The only good that will come from it is it will prove once and for all that SPENDING money you don't have is not the way to get us out of a recession.

20 posted on 10/03/2009 5:23:06 AM PDT by Voter#537 (Barack Insane Obama-Wrong Place Wrong Time. Replacing Jimmah as worst CIC Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son House
When I processed out of my company after nearly 28 years, I was advised that the 65% reduction in COBRA benefits would be considered taxable to me this year.

Talk about bait and switch!

21 posted on 10/03/2009 5:27:43 AM PDT by Redleg Duke ("Don't fire unless fired upon, but it they mean to have a war, let it begin here." J Parker, 1775)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita

all it’s doing is sucking money out of the private sector to hand out patronage jobs. From the resources used to create ONE job in the public sector, ONE AND A HALF jobs could be created in the private sector. And the private sector jobs would be long lasting and based on market demands

^
Excellent summation, too bad elected Republicans don’t think like you!


22 posted on 10/03/2009 5:36:49 AM PDT by Son House (President Ă˜bama => Status: AWOL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Son House

I was fortunate enough to retire about a year ago. I’ve paid a TON of taxes over the years. Looking at the situation now, I’m thinking I should get a job for a few months so I can get unemployed and collect ... forever ... and recoup some of my contributions. It seems a lot less risky than starting up a business with all of the taxes and hurdles being placed in the way. Would this qualify as “going Galt?”


23 posted on 10/03/2009 5:48:17 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Ike
I’ve noticed a trend among my Obamabot acquaintances - they often invoke WPA and CCC during discussions of the economy, and specifically, unemploymen

Both of which failed miserably. A point of fact the 0ites do not seem to understand

24 posted on 10/03/2009 6:04:54 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (The 0 years, Too bad a requirement for adult supervision was not put into the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62; Mikey_1962
That’s supply side economics. Neither party will even consider it.

Factually incorrect.

The House GOP purposed in January a program of business tax cuts in place of the bulk of the stimulus spending.

Dear Reader told them. "I won the election, we are not going to do that".

25 posted on 10/03/2009 6:06:41 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (The 0 years, Too bad a requirement for adult supervision was not put into the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Son House
Excellent summation, too bad elected Republicans don’t think like you!

Actually some of them do. The Republican Alternative to the Democrat Stimulus bill in January proposed business tax cuts in place of the spending.

Dear Reader told them "I won the election, we are not going to do that".

26 posted on 10/03/2009 6:09:05 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (The 0 years, Too bad a requirement for adult supervision was not put into the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Son House

Look folks, until 0bummerCare, Cap and Tax, forced unionization, Porkulus continuation, money supply blowout, and other Tax Increases are defeated, get the hell out of U.S. Investments.

We have possibly the worst investment climate this side of Zimbabwe.

Until 0bummer is soundly defeated, capital should flee, nobody should hire, and we should all grow vegetables.

Who is going to hire in that climate?


27 posted on 10/03/2009 6:09:19 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Have you heard the rumor: Cass Sunstein is a Communist, Censor, Bet Wetter, and Holder's Butt Boy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son House
the only jobs he can create are more GOVERNMENT jobs... and we sure as hell don't need any more people working for the guberment
28 posted on 10/03/2009 6:21:47 AM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist *DTOM* -ww- I AM JIM THOMPSON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
The House GOP purposed in January a program of business tax cuts in place of the bulk of the stimulus spending.

Why didn't the GOP do that when they were in power?

29 posted on 10/03/2009 6:29:35 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Ike
I’ve noticed a trend among my Obamabot acquaintances - they often invoke WPA and CCC during discussions of the economy, and specifically, unemployment...

Keep in mind that this is what Henry Morgenthau Jr., FDR's Secretary of the Treasury, said in the late 1930's after the CCC et. al had been in effect for a while:

We have tried spending money. We are spending more than we have ever spent before and it does not work. And I have just one interest, and if I am wrong . . . somebody else can have my job. I want to see this country prosperous. I want to see people get a job. I want to see people get enough to eat. We have never made good on our promises. . . . I say after eight years of this Administration we have just as much unemployment as when we started. . . . And an enormous debt to boot.

30 posted on 10/03/2009 6:31:23 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Son House

Funny how the DemocRat Hope and “”Change”” always turns out to be the same ole same ole DemRat Socialist Crap. ALWAYS. They put a different shade of lipstick on the pig, and half of the country falls for it every time. Why? Because they have a VESTED INTEREST to fall for it.

Here’s a thought. How about this for a “”change””. No worky, no votey. If you’re unwilling to get off your butt and work and contribute to this society, you don’t GET a say in how it works.

Novel idea, eh?


31 posted on 10/03/2009 6:32:03 AM PDT by XenaLee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
Why didn't the GOP do that when they were in power?

They did. Ever heard of the Bush tax cuts? It what got us out of the post 09-11 2002 recession.

The problem, which you seem to have forgotten, is the Democrats have been running the Congress since Jan 2007. Remember? Back when we had 4.5% unemployment?

32 posted on 10/03/2009 6:37:10 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (The 0 years, Too bad a requirement for adult supervision was not put into the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
Why didn't the GOP do that when they were in power?

They did. Ever heard of the Bush tax cuts? It what got us out of the post 09-11 2002 recession.

The problem, which you seem to have forgotten, is the Democrats have been running the Congress since Jan 2007. Remember? Back when we had 4.5% unemployment?

33 posted on 10/03/2009 6:37:30 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (The 0 years, Too bad a requirement for adult supervision was not put into the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

That would require them to admit that they were (are) wrong about everything they’ve been doing and bleating for decades....and that Reagan (whom they hate) was right.

DemocRats NEVER admit they were wrong about ANYthing.


34 posted on 10/03/2009 6:42:10 AM PDT by XenaLee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
They did. Ever heard of the Bush tax cuts?

You mean the rebates and cuts designed to put money in the pockets of consumers as W repeated ad nauseum? Those weren't supply side.

Back when we had 4.5% unemployment?

The employment fueled by break neck government growth, and commodities and real estate bubbles. There was no real private sector economic growth during the eight years of his horrible presidency that opened the door for Obama.

35 posted on 10/03/2009 6:53:03 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
This is what Americans seem to have trouble understanding.

Just because the President is in one party doesn't mean he gets what ever he wants from Congress controlled by the other party.

Who controls Congress actually matters a whole lot more in our system then who controls the White House. What ever bill the Congressional Leadership wants to die can be made to die no matter what a President wants.

36 posted on 10/03/2009 7:00:15 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (The 0 years, Too bad a requirement for adult supervision was not put into the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

What does that have to do with the time when the GOP controlled everything?


37 posted on 10/03/2009 7:02:47 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
You understanding of the 2002 Bush Tax cuts is non existent. Try actually learning event most basic facts. The complete ignorance of basic facts you display here is inexcusable.

The Bush tax cuts were not rebates, those were the product of the Democrat Congress in 2008. The 2002 Bush Taxcuts cut the top marginal tax rates on both businesses and individuals. They also cut a number of other tax rates and speed-ed up the depreciating schedule for business investments. They were completely supply side.

You are seriously embarassing yourself by posting such shrilly ignorant ranting. Please try actually learning the most basic fact rathern then posting anymore ignorant drivel.

38 posted on 10/03/2009 7:13:53 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (The 0 years, Too bad a requirement for adult supervision was not put into the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Son House
Hey, I have a good idea (but, it is really just an extension of their current policies).

We already are borrowing $0.50 of every government $1.00 we spend. Double down again the amount already owed on our national credit card and pay off some more political allies, friends, and other parasites. That will fix the economic problems. /s/

39 posted on 10/03/2009 8:18:55 AM PDT by Gritty (Alarm bells have become a siren. Spending, borrowing and debt are out of control-Sen. McConnell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson