"I may be a little biased here but, I think it's fair to say, number one, any of us would be angry, and two, that the Cambridge Swiss police acted stupidly.
Posted on 10/01/2009 4:49:31 AM PDT by Biggirl
Whoopi, I have a question for you: Have you ever heard of the words STATUTORY RAPE?
You may see this come up over the next day or so. You may have heard about Whoopi Goldberg’s assertion that Roman Polanski did not commit RAPE rape, whatever… But Toys r Us has a circular that defines Goldberg as a child advocate. As a reminder, here is the video from The View yesterday. Goldberg wanted to get the facts straight, which is understandable, but come on … does it seem to you that the Hollywood elite and Europe’s upper-class are trying to justify or re-define what Polanski did?
(Excerpt) Read more at radioviceonline.com ...
And OJ and Robert Blake got off because it wasnt murder, murder.
I guess drugging a 13 year old and raping her three ways while she cried NO! isn’t “rape-rape” to that genius Whoopi.
Whoopi, what exactly WOULD be “rape-rape?”
For Whoopi, it’s never been a question of brains brains, since hers apparently has been starved of oxygen oxygen for some time now.
Didn’t she brag sometime ago about getting seven abortions? I despise the woman. Some one had a number at Toys R Us to call. I forget where I saw that.
Goldberg is pathetic. We bought a Looney Tunes DVD a while back, and as a service to the chidren who would watch had Whoopi explaining to the the kiddies why some of the cartoons were PC, and not acceptable in today’s society. In Whoopi’s world Speedy Gonzalez is bad but a ‘not a rape rape’ of a thirteen year old is okay.
Typical liberal.
You can take the Whoopi out of the ghetto, but you can’t take the ghetto out of the Whoopi.
How much money the rapists has matters to Whoopi - and that's sick.
Liberals feel that a crime isn't a crime if a liberal elite does it to someone less powerful.
We don't agree.
It doesn't matter if the child rapist is living in a double wide and his victim is named "Jessica" or if the child is a guest in a more expensive crime scene.
It's still a crime.
Idiot liberals never cease to amaze me.
This is why I see a GROWING ANGRY BACKLASH against both the elites of D.C. and Hollywood and no amount of going for the 2016 summer olympic games in Chicago or anything else for that matter is going to COOL this JUST ANGER.
Would it be ‘rape-rape’ if Polanski was a priest?
That's exactly what I was wondering.
Is there footage of Whoopsie during the priest scandal? How judgmental was she then?
Rape-rape is twice as bad.
Whoopi feels the standard for the "talented" or rich should be different. That's offensive.
Conservatives see crimes against the innocent as the same. How much money the rapists has doesn't matter.
Rape is rape.
It doesn't matter if the child rapist is living in a double wide and his victim is named "Jessica" or if the child is a guest in a more expensive crime scene.
It was definitely RAPE, and not just “statutory”. He sodomized the child.
Sickening, sickening stuff! The Left is beyond stupid. They are criminal and dangerous to take the positions they do.
Whoppi was right. It wasn’t a rape-rape. It was a rape-rape-rape. /sarc
Seriously, the “liberal elites” DO see themselves as “nobility” subject to different rules than the peasants.
We threw off this mentality once in the history of our country. Looks like it’s time to do it again.
Will they back off and change their minds and attitudes after a political ass-whoopin? Or will lampposts have to be decorated in order for them to get the idea that “No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States”.
It wasn’t even “statutory” rape.
By all accounts, he plied the girl (13) with alcohol and drugs, and then sodomized her after she repeatedly said, “no”.
I can watch most Libtard actors/actresses in movies — since 90+% of them are Libs, I just don’t concern myself with it if there is a movie I want to watch. I just never watch any of them give their opinions on TV shows, because I don’t give a damn what they think.
But there are just a few, and Whoopeee is one of them, that I cannot stand to watch. If I am surfing the movie channels on satellite, and I see her name in a movie, I just move on. I just cannot stand her. She is a reprobate.
I just went to the Toys R Us web site and wrote Customer Service an email. I think it would be very effective if we started a protest against Ms. Goldberg. It’s time to stop this Hollywood crowd every chance we get. Here’s a chance.
Toys R Us
1-800-869-7787
http://www2.toysrus.com/guest/contUs.cfm
T-Mobile Casts Whoopi in myTouch Spots
NEW YORK T-Mobile is rolling out a campaign in support of myTouch 3G, which the company is pitching as a competitor to the iPhone.
http://www.adweek.com/aw/content_display/creative/news/e3i8b95ac51de67e196517c2d77390f9332
T-Mobile Contact Info:
Call us at: 1-800-T-MOBILE
1-800-866-2453
Business customers call: 1-888-537-4242
http://www.t-mobile.com/Contact.aspx
You have to read the recently released grand jury testimony to appreciate the vileness of what he did. Just remember: Thirteen’ll get you twenty. Bad odds.
This was a 13 year old “model”, who was basically pandered to, and left alone overnight with, Polanski by her own mother in Jack Nicholson's house in order to “advance her career” (whose career is undetermined). In Jack's defense, he apparently was not home at the time. Polanski gave the child alcohol and Methylqualone (Quaalude), a potentially deadly mix for an full-grown adult let alone a developing adolescent, and then.... well..... then he “had his way with her”. He was, is, and always will be scum.
It was the routine “casting couch” mentality business as usual in Hollywood. Still happens every day.
Whoopi (or more correctly Caryn, since there's actually no such thing as Whoopi Goldberg - that THING is just a character played by an actress named Caryn Johnson) is probably either projecting her own guilt at having been “couch casted” (although certainly not at 13), or more likely, her anger/disappointment for being so freakishly unattractive that she was never even considered for it (at any age).
Racism isn't really racism, Whoopi.
"I may be a little biased here but, I think it's fair to say, number one, any of us would be angry, and two, that the Cambridge Swiss police acted stupidly.
I was about to say the same thing, except I was going to include several more "rapes", as the victim has been raped in non physical ways as well...
Didn’t Whoopie lose a Slimfast endorsement a few years back for her big ole mouth? I guess she is so rich she doesn’t care?
On one level, I understand the point Whoopi was trying to make. She really wasn’t saying “I don’t think he RAPE raped her...” she was saying when referring to him and his CONVICTION, he was not convicted of “rape”, he was convicted of “Sex with a minor”, which still is technically “Statutory Rape”, but that’s not the technical law he was convicted of in 1978.
Are we allowed to call Whoopi a blithering idiot without being racist-racists?
Well I would have to ask the sister of the guy who founded the blog, she is a retired prosecuting lawyer.
Anyone who would pay the slightest attention to the opinions of a girl named “Woopie” has got a problem. Unfortunately “Woopie” is what passes for an intellectual spokesman for the leftists today. Whoopie should be working with ACORN where pedophilia apparently is not a problem.
Whoopie is saying its okay to drug, rape, and anally sodomize a 13 year old girl.
Would these same Hollywood a-holes be saying the same thing if it were a 13 year old boy that he raped and sodomized?
What this man did was not rape-rape. It was rape-rape-rape. He depended on the trust of the victim, used drugs and alcohol and violated the victim who was saying ‘no’. In my book this is much worse than rape-rape. At least with the former the victim can take some solace, but frequently don't, in the fact that she was just a target of random opportunity. For this victim she has to live with the fact that her dreams of a future were used to trick her into being violated. Not only did he betray the trust of the victim, but also that of her mother.
Yes, Whoopi, I agree with you, it wasn't rape-rape. It was infinitely worse.
And one more thing while we're on the subject, Whoopi. He's not under arrest for deceiving, drugging and raping a 13-year-old girl. He's under arrest for fleeing to avoid incarceration. A completely separate crime for which the people of the State have every right to demand the prescribed penalty be paid, in full, and with interest.
Yes, and with the added dimension that those of us who didn’t cheer and applaud his doing that to a boy are gay-bashers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.