COMMENT FROM ORLY TAITZ

ANTI-MULLAH ^ | September 28, 2009

[Elderberry]

Thanks.

What do they say about Birds of a feather?

[sportutegrl]

O RLY

[GOPJ]

Thanks for the ping.

[Red Steel]

Even money says it’s make beleive.

Googolplex to 1 it's not.

[DirtyHarryY2K]

BTTT

[bobsatwork]

...it could well prevent him from being reelected. If it accomplishes that much, it will be worth the effort - I agree (but I still think Taitz is a loon). Highly recommended article: Suborned in the USA by Andrew McCarthy, on NRO.

[Pilsner]

To repeat NO COURT will EVER unseat any *elected, sworn in, and sitting POTUS based on 'eligibility'. Never happen."

Aside from a case of rampant, *defeatist, pessimistic negativism, what is your basis for that claim?

Tell you what champ, you post a citation to one instance where the United States Courts have removed one person holding an office described by the United States Constitution from office for some alleged qualification problem. One President. One Vice-President. One Senator. One Representative. One Federal Judge. One United States Ambassador. Can you name just one? Can any one? Bueller? Bueller?

When you can't find any case, before calling me a troll, why don't you read the Constitution.

Art 1, §2 The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

Art 1, §3 The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside:

The Constitution gives the Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. Period. No. No arguments, no "but they won't impeach Obama." Period.

You don't like that answer? Fine. The Constitution does provide a remedy:

Art 5. The Congress,... on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States.

Just have the legislatures of 2/3 of the several States call for a Constitutional Convention, and then you can propose an Amendment that says Obama has to show you his long form birth certificate, his college transcript, his draft registration, and the three gold crescent moons he got at the madras in Indonesia.

[browardchad]

For all the non-wussies that are cautious of Orly's site, don't use IE -- there's still definitely some sort of Trojan script lurking there, and if you have decent AV, it will set off an alarm. FF apparently blocks it.

Carry on with the tough guy stuff, by all means, but don't blame anyone but yourself if you have to clean up a computer mess.

[Red Steel]

What do they say about Birds of a feather?

It's something like smelly trolls gather under bridges. ;-)

[SaraJohnson]

If the court can just get to the truth, I will be happy. From there on, it is up to the Congress and the American people to handle. Bam sure loses status by being an illegal president if they keep him in office.

[Sibre Fan]

Judge Land in GA granted my motion to withdraw as counsel. the reason, i had to do it, since Cpt Connie Rhodes was under tremendous pressure, intimidation by the military and department of defense and she stated that she didn’t want to proceed under this pressure. Now I don’t have my hands tied behind my back, I can provide more info, now I can do more on my own behalf.
-----
It will be interesting to see the outcome of this 'hands tied behind my back'. She needs to be careful of how she responds or she may find herself in deeper with Judge Land.

She also needs to be careful what she posts on her blog, and not just for Judge Land, but for the California State Bar. She just disclosed confidential information covered by the attorney-client privilege in her public blog.

This is a problem for Orly. While she didn't provide details, she disclosed something Rhodes (allegedly) told her.

Anything your client tells an attorney in the context of the case is confidential and privileged, and the attorney cannot waive that privilege except in very limited circumstances such as if the client then sues the attorney. In that case, the attorney may disclose limited information necessary to defend herself against claims brought by the client.

In short, by making that statement on her blog, Taitz just did exactly what Judge Land told her she was not authorized to do - disclosing client communications subject to attorney-client privilege. I doubt that Judge Land will -- if he even finds out about it -- change any aspect of his order. However, I expect that the California Bar will ... be very interested if Rhodes decides to file a complaint.

[Elderberry]

That’s old fear mongering.
Get with it. Try something new.

[OldDeckHand]

"Judge Land in GA granted my motion to withdraw as counsel. the reason, i had to do it, since Cpt Connie Rhodes was under tremendous pressure, intimidation by the military and department of defense and she stated that she didn’t want to proceed under this pressure."

Is this woman an idiot? Let's stipulate for a moment that her claim about Rhodes being under "pressure" is true. Let's also stipulate that Rhodes actually said this to Taitz. Is Taitz so incompetent that she doesn't realize she may have just violated DR 4-101 of the Code of Professional Responsibility, also known as client-attorney privilege?

It's a violation in which disbarment is a likely outcome.

[kellynla]

CLUCK...cluck, cluck...cluck...did someone let a chicken in here? LMAO

[browardchad]

She needs other attorneys to help her.

She doesn't need any other attorneys -- she has Charles Lincoln, a thrice disbarred lawyer who was convicted of fraud, helping her. And he and Orly are in the foreclosure business, as advertised on her blog, in case her law career doesn't work out.

What could go wrong?

[DixiesRebel]

Believe it or not, I actually spoke to Dr. Taitz back in early August, suggesting to her to subpoena Obama’s Aunt (she is sister to Obama’s true father) living in Boston to appear as witness to the facts involved of the birth and citizenship of Obama. She has a court date for asylum to the US for citizenship from Kenya in February, 2010. This cab absolutely be a vital part of the evidence/merits to the case. Do you all agree?

[Elderberry]

It’s not privileged info if it’s common knowledge.
Come on Old Deck Hand. You should know what goes on in the military.

[Grunthor]

It does not take a law degree to look at someones’ statements and actions and form a personal opinion that they are, in fact, nuttier and a squirrel turd.

[ridesthemiles]

You will need alot of salt & pepper for that crow.

[ridesthemiles]

but the uproar from his removal would eclipse everything else.””

When Phillip J Berg filed his first lawsuit on Aug 22, 2008- he hammered the point that if nothing is done, a Constitutional crisis would develop.