Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A New Push To Define 'Person,' And To Outlaw Abortion In The Process
LATimes ^ | September 27, 2009

Posted on 09/27/2009 9:26:38 PM PDT by Steelfish

A new push to define 'person,' and to outlaw abortion in the process Some abortion foes think the rationale for Roe vs. Wade is vulnerable. They're trying to amend state constitutions -- including California's -- to define personhood from conception.

By Robin Abcarian September 28, 2009

It is one of the enduring questions of religion and science, and lately of American politics: When does a fertilized egg become a person?

Abortion foes, tired of a profusion of laws that limit but do not abolish abortion, are trying to answer the question in a way that they hope could put an end to legalized abortion.

Across the country, they have revived efforts to amend state constitutions to declare that personhood -- and all rights accorded human beings -- begins at conception.

From Florida to California, abortion foes are gathering signatures, pressing state legislators, and raising money to put personhood measures on ballots next year. In Louisiana, a class at a Catholic high school is lobbying state legislators as part of a civics exercise.

"We have big and small efforts going on in 30 states right now," said Keith Mason, co-founder of Colorado-based Personhood USA. "Our goal is to activate the population."

Critics deride the effort as the "egg-as-person" movement and say it threatens in vitro fertilization; some kinds of birth control, including IUDs and pills; and stem cell research. They say that Americans will reject it as a government intrusion into their privacy.

"It's a back-door abortion ban," said Ted Miller, spokesman for NARAL Pro-Choice America, which has worked with Planned Parenthood and other abortion rights groups to defeat such measures.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: abortion; personhood

1 posted on 09/27/2009 9:26:39 PM PDT by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Since most children are aborted naturally, that means that each potential aborted child will require a complete funeral, complete with payments to the funeral director...


2 posted on 09/27/2009 9:33:12 PM PDT by donmeaker (Invicto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
I am aware of funerals for persons whose life never extended beyond Mother's womb, but to suggest it will be essential to treat the remains in a manner parallel to those of persons whose lives extended beyond that is new to me. In some cases this may not be at all practical.

To the question of person-hood and when does it begin, it seems to me the right thing is to give the benefit of the doubt to the possibility of person-hood at conception.

3 posted on 09/27/2009 9:46:22 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker

???

You said: “Since most children are aborted naturally,...”
Do you really believe that there are more spontaneous abortions than births?

I think that you are way off.


4 posted on 09/27/2009 9:51:16 PM PDT by It's me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: It's me

An average woman can have 15 in her life time.....that is average. Now a woman with fertility problems.....a lot higher.


5 posted on 09/27/2009 10:03:20 PM PDT by Morgana ( Wir wollen nicht ein Forth Reich Obama!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
an average of 15 miscarriages per woman? not very likely

do you have any sources for such a claim???

6 posted on 09/27/2009 10:13:21 PM PDT by xhrist ("You don't have a soul. You are a Soul. You have a body. " - C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Personhood! WooHoo!


7 posted on 09/27/2009 10:27:27 PM PDT by reagandemocrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
Since most children are aborted naturally, that means that each potential aborted child will require a complete funeral, complete with payments to the funeral director... PURE UNADULTERATED HORSECRAP, AND YOU KNOW IT!

Keep your anti-life propaganda to the websites that won't recognize it for the LIE you and your ilk try to present it to be. The *choice* you SCREAM at us is simply the decision the MURDERESS makes to SPREAD HER LEGS. There is nothing else.

8 posted on 09/27/2009 11:13:06 PM PDT by Don W (I will praise Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
"Across the country, they have revived efforts to amend state constitutions to declare that personhood -- and all rights accorded human beings -- begins at conception."

I am 99.9% sure that Arkansas has in fact done this, not in their legislature, but in their court system. It seems to me that whatever the courts say is the law, so why doesn't this count?

9 posted on 09/27/2009 11:30:15 PM PDT by matthew fuller (BHO-Aks not what you can do for your country; Aks only what you can do for ME ME ME!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matthew fuller

Here is the URL: www.nrlc.org/news/2001/NRL06/arkansas.html


10 posted on 09/27/2009 11:40:52 PM PDT by matthew fuller (BHO-Aks not what you can do for your country; Aks only what you can do for ME ME ME!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: xhrist

I don’t think she’s talking about miscarriages. I recall, from various biology classes along the way, that a number of eggs get fertilized, but are incapable of developing much beyond that step. Many would not implant in the uterine lining; others might implant, but end up being miscarried without the mother ever knowing she was pregnant. I do not believe there is really any way of knowing how often those events occur.


11 posted on 09/27/2009 11:51:49 PM PDT by exDemMom (Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Don W
Keep your anti-life propaganda to the websites that won't recognize it for the LIE you and your ilk try to present it to be. The *choice* you SCREAM at us is simply the decision the MURDERESS makes to SPREAD HER LEGS. There is nothing else.

If personhood begins at conception, then many people are aborted naturally.

Prospective studies using very sensitive early pregnancy tests have found that 25% of pregnancies are miscarried by the sixth week of the woman's Last Menstrual Period.

And it gets much worse for older adults trying to conceive. Should older married couples be prohibited from having sex because they're likely to create a fertilized egg that will be spontaneously aborted?

12 posted on 09/27/2009 11:56:32 PM PDT by mc6809e
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew
To the question of person-hood and when does it begin, it seems to me the right thing is to give the benefit of the doubt to the possibility of person-hood at conception.

How about working harder to understand what it is that makes a person a person?

13 posted on 09/28/2009 12:06:09 AM PDT by mc6809e
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mc6809e

A natural miscarriage (termed “NATURAL ABORTION” by some) is most emphatically NOT in the same category as a human caused artificial TERMINATION of a life, simply because it is inconvenient to the woman entrusted by its presence.

Choose LIFE! Your own MOTHER DID!

To throw the CANARD about older couples simply demonstrates how utterly bereft of logic, reason, and simple human compassion the anti-life folk are.


14 posted on 09/28/2009 12:56:36 AM PDT by Don W (I will praise Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: It's me

No. That is an accurate statement.

Most pregnancies end in spontaneous abortions very early in the pregnancy, usually during the first twelve weeks. It is called a miscarriage when it occours after a certain number of weeks when a woman realizes she is pregnant, I can’t remember exactly the number. Many women think they’ve just missed a ‘period’, but they’ve actually had a spontaneious abortion.

This is not unusual. It happens frequently among cattle and horses, too.

I remember reading that fact, oh, thirty-five or so years ago.


15 posted on 09/28/2009 4:22:01 AM PDT by SatinDoll (NO Foreign Nationals as our President!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Don W

I think the term is spontaneous abortion. When a fertilized egg does not implant in the walls of the uterus, what happens to it?

Implantation occurs only 25% of the time.

Those are the facts. Deal with it.


16 posted on 09/28/2009 7:53:32 AM PDT by donmeaker (Invicto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson