Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates Says Severe Sanctions On Iran Could Work [Go Tell That To Israel!]
LATimes ^ | September 27, 2009

Posted on 09/27/2009 1:08:22 PM PDT by Steelfish

Defense Secretary Robert Gates Says Severe Sanctions On Iran Could Work

Gates says additional sanctions may force an economically squeezed Iran to change its nuclear policy. He questions the value of military strikes.

By Paul Richter September 27, 2009

Reporting from Washington - Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said today the severe sanctions the West is threatening against Iran could force a change in the Islamic Republic's nuclear ambitions, especially since the country is already under severe economic distress.

Speaking as officials from six world powers prepare to meet with Iranian negotiators this week to discuss Tehran's nuclear program, Gates noted that the unemployment rate is 40% among Iran's young people, and asserted that past economic sanctions "are having an impact."

Severe additional sanctions "would have the potential to bringing them to change their policies," Gates said on ABC's "This Week."

In contrast, Gates played down, as he has in the past, the value of military strikes, saying at most they could only retard Iran's nuclear program by an estimated one to three years.

"The reality is, there is no military option that does anything other than buy time," he said in an interview on CNN's "State of the Union" program

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Israel; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bobgates; iran; iraniannukes; sanctions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last

1 posted on 09/27/2009 1:08:22 PM PDT by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Can we please stop pussy-footing around, and hit the underground nuclear installations with Tactical Nukes?

That’s the only way to blast those bunkers. Bunker-busters won’t penetrate a MOUNTAIN.


2 posted on 09/27/2009 1:09:40 PM PDT by Islam=Murder (Hitler hated his Jewish side, Omoslem hates his white side.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Hot, bright, radioactive sanctions might work quite well!


3 posted on 09/27/2009 1:10:53 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (The Democrat party is a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Bobby Gates and Zbutthead Brzezinsky cowrote the 2004 CFR "Iran: Time for a New Approach (Negotiations)".

Why, just LOOK at what twelve years of sanctions forced Iraq to do--nothing.

Gates is an ass. Cutting the F-22 and the missile defense program.

Do we not know that China, Venezuela or Russia will help Iran with its gasoline requirements.

Does Hussein think we are stupid.

Why, of course he does--we bought his line of crap.

4 posted on 09/27/2009 1:11:40 PM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hussein: Islamo-Commie from Kenya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Islam=Murder

One has to wonder if Israel is developing something undercover expressly for that type of situation. I believe they are so deep they are supposedly nukeproof.


5 posted on 09/27/2009 1:12:14 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (The Democrat party is a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

The only sanction which will work against Iran is one nuke detonated in each of their nuclear facilities. I suspect it will be the Israelis who sanction Iran.


6 posted on 09/27/2009 1:12:15 PM PDT by MIchaelTArchangel (I AM JIM THOMPSON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Because sanctions have worked so well in the past with nutjobs....


7 posted on 09/27/2009 1:12:27 PM PDT by Domandred (Fdisk, format, and reinstall the entire .gov system. I am Jim Thompson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

I believe that the government of Iran would accept the starvation of all of its people before it would shelve its goal of blowing Israel off the map.

Our government is filled with corrupt morons, and the bill is about to come due.


8 posted on 09/27/2009 1:12:36 PM PDT by chris37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

A new movie? The Achmedinejah Sanction?


9 posted on 09/27/2009 1:12:44 PM PDT by MIchaelTArchangel (I AM JIM THOMPSON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

We should have known that severe sanctions would work ...LONG AGO!


10 posted on 09/27/2009 1:14:38 PM PDT by givemELL (Does Taiwan Meet the Criteria to Qualify as an "Overseas Territory of the United States"? by Richar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Even George Stephanopolis laughed that one off.


11 posted on 09/27/2009 1:14:49 PM PDT by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

With all due respect to Gates, sanctions don’t have a particularly good track record in changing the behavior of hostile states.

What usually seems to happen is A) the average citizen in the targeted country suffers mightily while the powers that be scarcely get their hair mussed by the sanctions; B) One or more nations ignore the sanctions and/or the sanction process is riddled with corruption (which allows A to happen). Cuba, Iraq, North Korea, the list goes on and on.


12 posted on 09/27/2009 1:15:45 PM PDT by DemforBush (Somebody wake me when sanity has returned to the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Someone needs to clue Gates in on the fact that Nut-job and the ruling mullahs have a blood theology that requires an all out global war in order to hasten the return of the their “12th” Or Hidden) imam to rule over the earth...

So why pray tell, would sanctions be a stumbling stone to stopping the mullahs desires for a fierily end?

13 posted on 09/27/2009 1:16:06 PM PDT by VRWCTexan (Obama-scare is the "real" Cash for Clunker Program!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

China, Venezuela, and others will not abide by the sanctions. Iran has oil, which will find a market.


14 posted on 09/27/2009 1:17:50 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
[I believe they are so deep they are supposedly nukeproof.]

The entrances could be temporarily sealed with conventional bombs. Then an enhanced radiation device (Neutron bomb) could poison the area around these sites.

15 posted on 09/27/2009 1:18:44 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
These lib-nuts are just plain wrong on further sanctions.

This will force Iran's hand and they will move forward with sinking oil freighters in the straight of Hormuz.

Iran will not stop until they have a nuke and when they have that nuke, it will be more than one.

You can count on it.

16 posted on 09/27/2009 1:18:53 PM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

To get the Russians and Chinese, especially the Chinese, to agree to very tough sanctions against the Iranians will extremely difficult. The Russians have opened the door to talking about additional sanctions, but with no promises whatsoever. They are making a fortune selling high technology and advanced weapons systems to Tehran, and they are not going to give up that cash cow until they absolutely have to. The Chinese have already said that if there is a worldwide ban on gasoline exports to Iran that they would supply Tehran themselves. Hardly words of encouragemtn for Bambi.


17 posted on 09/27/2009 1:19:00 PM PDT by moose2004 (Stand up, speak out and stop Obamacare and GE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rbg81
Yes I saw various tweets by different MSM basically laughing at Gates trying to talk out of both sides of his mouth this morning....

I'm so disappointed in Gates wimp-out on this as well as abandonment of the generals regarding Afghanistan

18 posted on 09/27/2009 1:19:41 PM PDT by VRWCTexan (Obama-scare is the "real" Cash for Clunker Program!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
re: Severe Sanctions On Iran Could Work

This is kinda like:

Q: How many men does it take to put a toilet seat down?

A: No one knows, it's never been done.

Only in this case:

Q: How well will severe sanctions work against Iran?

A: No one knows, they never been able to get Russia and China and other countries with a vested interest in Iran's well-being to go along with them.

Of course sanctions would work, but they would have to be universally applied. None of the BS like with the oil sanctions on Iraq that became another huge black eye for the UN when records uncovered after the US invasion showed how many nations and companies were ignoring them.

There is no such thing as solidarity when it comes to nations dealing with other nations. Each one acts in its own best interest, period. That goes double for socialist and communist governments.

19 posted on 09/27/2009 1:22:22 PM PDT by jwparkerjr (God Bless America, and wake us up while you're about it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Assuming entrances can be found. Might be some distance under the sand, fitted with equipment intended to drill or sleeve a fresh passage to the top of the sand.

But if the entrances are known, then plain old wet cement would do the trick.


20 posted on 09/27/2009 1:23:00 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (The Democrat party is a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

...A brief history about the first Iraq war. Hussein, ‘we give up, I’m digging a hole.’ GHWB, “Not good enough!” Hussein, ‘We surrender!’ GHWB, “To little, too late! “Come on phucas, COME ON!”...

...A jump to the present. Pentagon, “Mr. CIC, we need more troops in the middle east.” POTUS, “Not good enough, too little, too late.”...

...With all due respect, MR. PRES, this is your war now. Go all out, or get out!!!


21 posted on 09/27/2009 1:26:31 PM PDT by gargoyle (...My thoughts are not seditious, or treasonous, they're revolutionary...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gargoyle

If America means anything at all to Bummer, he’d better hope for a GOP hawk to take his place soon.


22 posted on 09/27/2009 1:29:55 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (The Democrat party is a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: gargoyle

The UN sanctions on Iraq really worked wonders. It was very profitable for a lot of politicians and UN staffers.
Suddam was able to spread his influence to the highest levels of foreign govts.


23 posted on 09/27/2009 1:29:55 PM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat

Similarly, this will just put Dinner Jacket in the catbird seat.


24 posted on 09/27/2009 1:32:28 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (The Democrat party is a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

[. . .fitted with equipment intended to drill or sleeve a fresh passage to the top of the sand.]

No doubt they have thought of this. Neutron bombs would contaminate the surface to make such self-rescue hazardous.


25 posted on 09/27/2009 1:33:16 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
"The reality is, there is no military option that does anything other than buy time," he said in an interview on CNN's "State of the Union" program

I disagree (and I wonder if Gates is being "loyal" to Obama and knows better as well). After all the money Iranian leaders have poured into this program, if Israel does the right thing for the rest of the world and destroys the program, I imagine it'll do a whole lot more political damage than a severe reprimand from the UN, even if that reprimand carries sanctions that cost Iran an extra 5% on imports to smuggle whatever they want into the country. If Israel buys time for the regime to fall, I'd call that victory, whether the fall comes directly from the public reaction to the wasteful program that brought on the Israeli strike or it comes in the extra years of delay produced by Israel's strike.

26 posted on 09/27/2009 1:34:52 PM PDT by TurtleUp ([...Insert today's quote from Community-Organizer-in-Chief...] - Obama, YOU LIE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Locating them will be the problem. It is impractical to neutron irradiate the entire land area of Iran.


27 posted on 09/27/2009 1:41:17 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (The Democrat party is a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

A Jewish Uranium 235 salad would work much much better!


28 posted on 09/27/2009 1:43:21 PM PDT by TRY ONE (NUKE the unborn gay whales!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Obama KNEW about the Iranian additional bomb factories.

There is one conclusion:
Obama has lied to America before, HE WILL do it again.

29 posted on 09/27/2009 1:43:45 PM PDT by Diogenesis ("Those who go below the surface do so at their peril" - Oscar Wilde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Nuke them before they nuke us ought to be the mantra.


30 posted on 09/27/2009 1:50:21 PM PDT by VRWC For Truth (Throw the bums out who vote yes on the bail out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

In defense of Gates, Iran is in a different position than Iraq was. There’s a significant and vocal opposition movement going on. The Iranians probably wouldn’t take it too well if their government forced them to starve because of sanctions while they continued to build the bomb.


31 posted on 09/27/2009 1:52:31 PM PDT by SMCC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
I'd still like to see what happens when one of these explodes 200' below ground.
32 posted on 09/27/2009 2:14:06 PM PDT by meatloaf (Obama, Obozo ... what's the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: meatloaf

Nice looking Massive Ordnance Penetrator.


33 posted on 09/27/2009 2:19:22 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Um, not sure about your “go tell that to Israel” headline edit. They have been saying the same thing today.

“JERUSALEM — Israel is lobbying Western powers to impose harsher sanctions on arch-foe Iran after Tehran disclosed the existence of a second uranium enrichment plant, Israeli news reports said on Sunday.” http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jxBR5De-7MAoB-kw08aTYDV7okBQ


34 posted on 09/27/2009 2:19:37 PM PDT by maquiladora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MIchaelTArchangel

So, is a large, smoking crater a sanction, or an effect?


35 posted on 09/27/2009 2:44:56 PM PDT by Clioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
While it's true that a COMPLETE blockade AND embargo...enforced by US air and naval power, could bring Iran to it's knees in very short order, I have little hope the US administration has this in mind.

However, 10,000 sorties...of which 2,500 are by B-1's and B-52's could ALSO do the the job:)

Want to save av-gas? 50 tactical nukes.

36 posted on 09/27/2009 2:45:50 PM PDT by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Islam=Murder

Not sure that would work.

Maybe cut off the snake’s head. Take out the government leaders/Ayatollahs?


37 posted on 09/27/2009 2:48:58 PM PDT by airborne (Don't let history record that, when faced with evil, you did nothing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: VRWCTexan

I’m sure Gates knows better—just trying to protect his boss. Its nice to think that people like Defense secretaries are something more than rank politicians—but that’s usually not the case.


38 posted on 09/27/2009 2:50:13 PM PDT by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: meatloaf

I’d like to see what happens when 3 are dropped in the same spot, one after the other after the other!


39 posted on 09/27/2009 2:50:39 PM PDT by airborne (Don't let history record that, when faced with evil, you did nothing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
said today the severe sanctions the West is threatening against Iran could force a change in the Islamic Republic's nuclear ambitions
Even one of George S' partisan media shills in the roundtable segment said without Russia and China there will be no sanctions.
40 posted on 09/27/2009 3:00:25 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MIchaelTArchangel

> The only sanction which will work against Iran is one nuke detonated in each of their nuclear facilities. I suspect it will be the Israelis who sanction Iran.
I doubt that Israel would use one of her nukes to do this. Everyone assumes Israel has nukes, nobody can prove it, and the Israelis probably like it that way. I don’t think Israel would use a nuke unless it was a last resort. The Iranian nuke sites will glow enough from their own radiation if a few well placed large bombs are used properly.


41 posted on 09/27/2009 3:10:12 PM PDT by BuffaloJack (Obama, you stop lying; we'll stop callin' you a LIAR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora

I think that’s a strategic decision by Israel knowing fully well that China and Russia would not go for “extreme” sanctions. This will give Israel cover to go for the bunker busters.


42 posted on 09/27/2009 3:11:07 PM PDT by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

“The revised NIE shows that non-military measures are the best way to curb Iran’s nuclear program. The new national estimate validates the Administration’s strategy of bringing diplomatic and economic pressures to bear on the Iranian government to change its policies.”

Sec of Defense Gates – Kabal, Afghanstan Time (Dec 5, 2007)

http://luckybogey.wordpress.com/2009/09/25/2007-national-intelligence-estimate-nie-on-irans-nukes-was-dick-cheney-right/


43 posted on 09/27/2009 3:13:50 PM PDT by luckybogey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luckybogey

These fools will never eat crow. Instead they will continue down the same path of appeasement oblivious to history and the rogue state’s record.


44 posted on 09/27/2009 3:16:28 PM PDT by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: devolve; Steelfish; ntnychik; dixiechick2000; MeekOneGOP; PhilDragoo
SELF HYPNOTIC ABBERATION


45 posted on 09/27/2009 3:44:43 PM PDT by potlatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

.

LOL!

“Live long and prespire” - Spock


46 posted on 09/27/2009 4:27:59 PM PDT by devolve ( . . . . . . . . . . never whack them with a 2x4 if 4x4 is handy . . . . . . . . . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

We should bomb Iran’s oil refineries and bring them to their knees.

Attacking the nuclear installations is only a piece of the equation.


47 posted on 09/27/2009 4:30:22 PM PDT by JHBowden (Keep the Change!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devolve

Expire too. Guess Spock didn’t emit?


48 posted on 09/27/2009 4:49:06 PM PDT by potlatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

.

Recall Spock’s “V” hand sign - And him saying: “Live long and prosper!”


49 posted on 09/27/2009 4:53:53 PM PDT by devolve ( . . . . . . . . . . never whack them with a 2x4 if 4x4 is handy . . . . . . . . . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: devolve

“prosper”
Lol, I have that image. I don’t recall any of his ‘sayings’. You remember all of that.


50 posted on 09/27/2009 4:57:27 PM PDT by potlatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson