......
Posted on 09/24/2009 8:49:26 AM PDT by pissant
Michele Bachmann is pro amnesty?
http://reuters.viewdle.com/video/Palin+addresses+Chavez+and+illegal+immigration+in+first+Spanish+interv...?vid=reuters-3009-USA-PALIN-1224643320.mpg&pid=1061d1c341ca60d466cf2db77ea52811
I don't speak MEXICAN LINGO!!
She "insists" that is the way to go? Do you have a post election source for that?
******************
Agreed. This is not only a smart move, I believe it's sincere.
Yep.
Romney supporters.
What would it take to convince you?
Do you recall the story of his boat trip to Alaska and introduction to Palin?
Or, leading the conversation in a different direction, do you recall that Murdoch sold the Weekly Standard to Philip Anschutz, who bought the San Francisco Examiner in 2004. Well, Anschutz inherited a lot of money and is the richest TheoCon in the world, and spends a lot of money to subsidize the Discovery Institute.
Given the intersection of many events, and putting on a tinfoil hat, we can safely say that the Reagan coalition is definately dead and the new GOP coalition is between the NeoCons and TheoCons.
Do you think that Dick Cheney would consent to running as Palin's VP?
Especially in the area of Amnesty and secure borders.
If you mean social conservatives then that pretty much is the conservative movement, the rest all play a part but they are smaller in numbers, most non-social conservatives already vote democrat.
Especially in the area of Amnesty and secure borders.
She’s more qualified than that socialist in the White House now who thinks his job is to travel around the country and the world in Air Force One just so he can run his mouth. How many days has he actually been in Washington sitting behind his desk in the oval office....?
Yeah. Bill Kristol. So what. If he’s a neocon, that’s fine. I’ve never liked him very much. Just like I don’t care for the vast, vast majority of gum flappers posing as journalists.
Kristol is about as influential as Cindy Sheehan. The WS has a circulation of 83,000. Compare that to the NRA’s magazine circulation. Or Rush’s or Savage’s listeners. Or the number of people who get In Primus.
Reagan’s national security boys are still around.
http://www.ascfusa.org/index.php
So, . . Sarah Palin has perfected time travel??
current levels = last years budget
Kinda picky? What she said was clear, correct, and you try to pick at it as if it was said by some space cadet?
"Current" refers to FY09, which ends 09/31/09, and they "have already been reduced" for FY10??
Specifically, since the adjective "current" means 'happening now, prevailing, the latest version', etc., how could the defense budget have previosly been reduced from"current levels" (levels that exist today)?
If, however, "current levels" refers to the Fiscal Year 2009 Defense budget, and the defense budget that has seen significant program cuts means the FY 2010 Defense Budget (that is now being drafted and begins 10/01/09), I'm beginning to see the light.
So, if I've got it right, I did not understand that "current" refers only to FY09, and the rest of the verbiage refers to FY10.
What do you say?
......
Do you have a problem with that? If so, why don't you assail the cut and those who cut it, rather than pick at Sarah's verbiage, verbiage that is clear to most everyone?
And yes, you are picking at a gnat, a flea, a nothing, while the mastadon runs through the living room destroying everything. Save your wrath of Bambi, he's the one wrecking things.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.