Posted on 09/22/2009 9:06:41 PM PDT by Saije
United States President Barack Obama and members of his administration are going to great lengths to explain the reasons why the US abruptly changed course with respect to its anti-missile strategy for Europe. In the process, little or nothing has been said about the impact of this new plan on Asia.
Silence or not, both China and Japan must assess the consequences of this activity because what the US is now proposing for Europe in terms of missile defense is right in line with what has been unfolding all along in East Asia, where the US Navy forms the front line for the US missile shield, backed by land-based interceptors in increasing numbers and a powerful radar network both on land and at sea...
When it comes to US economic and national security concerns, China - not Russia - is Obama's top priority. And North Korea's actions, not Iran's present posturing, is what has preoccupied US ballistic missile defense (BMD) planners so intensely over the past five years.
The US decision does not put Asia at risk, but it does not fit well with current US efforts to improve ties with China at a time when North Korea is happy to cast itself as the largest dormant volcano in Northeast Asia. Obama is displaying a lack of predictability, and this weighs on US-China relations. Making China uncomfortable at this point is not a good idea because Beijing equates a failure to appreciate the need for predictability with instability, and perhaps even distrust....
(Excerpt) Read more at atimes.com ...
Ping.
I like that,
“where the Us Navy forms the frontline”
until Obama seeks to dismantle that too, like the CIA, the European missile shield....
it all adds up to making America as weak and vulnerable as possible.
I like that,
“where the Us Navy forms the frontline”
until Obama seeks to dismantle that too, like the CIA, the European missile shield....
it all adds up to making America as weak and vulnerable as possible.
Less of a mystery now. It appears that it was a decision taken in haste in preparation for the talks on 23 September in the UN, preparatory to the 1 October meetings in Geneva which concern Russia's participation in "crippling" sanctions against Iran. Cooperation by the Russians is the reward 0bama apparently expects in return for the BMD turnaround in Poland and the Czech Republic.
He won't get it. Russia already has what they want. And making him look good is as far as they're likely to go. Expect a press blizzard, with nothing of substance behind it.
China and Venezuela supply Iran...they don't need the Russians.
Thank you for the ping Jet Jaguar.
For those who say President Obama is ignorant; they are wrong.
The truth is that he has an agenda and with the help of his administration, czars, friends and associates; he is fulfilling this.
Maybe not, but they are great pals anyways.
With Russian cooperation sanctions are possible. Without it they aren't. The Chinese are spectators in this one. That's why 0bama slipped the dagger into the Poles and the Czechs. He wants the Russians to help with the sanctions. They, in turn, want a free hand in the territories that used to be a part of the Soviet Union. The Poles will be fine for now but the Ukrainians had better forget about NATO.
Will the Russians play? I'm guessing not - although it really isn't in their long-term interest to see nuclear weapons in Iranian hands, the Iranians are a strategic lever against the U.S. in Europe. They can always deal with the Iranians later should it become necessary.
I don’t think that the Obama administration wants the United States to act like a Great Power.
0bama won’t be satisfied until America resembles Haiti, or perhaps his homeland.
I'm so tired of high school students getting title editor jobs...
I believe you are 100 percent on the money.
Perhaps beyond that
Are either Indonesia or Kenya communist?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.